Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070219C070402
Original file (2002070219C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 04 APRIL 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070219

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was “guarding” payroll for the Army when he was “shot by three cowboy criminals.” He notes that “it was under investigation at the time” and that he was never awarded the Purple Heart. In support of his request he submits a copy of a medical treatment record.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He initially entered active duty on 28 March 1970 and in June 1971 reenlisted for duty in Vietnam. The applicant arrived in Vietnam in November 1971 and was briefly assigned to the 40th Ordnance Company prior to being reassigned to the 54th Ordnance Company. In March 1972 he was reassigned to Company E of the 50th Infantry as a security guard.

The medical treatment form, submitted by the applicant, indicates that he was treated for a gunshot wound to the abdomen on 11 May 1972. The reports notes that wound resulted from a “45 caliber bullet” and notes he was “WIA” (wounded in action).

However, an original DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), contained in the applicant’s file, indicates that the applicant was “guarding” a payroll at the China Beach compound when he “was set upon by 3 local national males who bound him and shot him.” The applicant’s injury was determined to be “in line of duty.”

As a result of the applicant’s injury he was evacuated to Okinawa and ultimately assigned to Fort Lewis, Washington. In January 1974 the applicant was reassigned to Germany and on 20 April 1975 he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service.

Neither the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), nor his DA Form 20 (enlisted qualification record), reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart, and item 40 (wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant last authenticated his DA Form 20 in January 1974 and his DD Form 214 was authenticated when he was released from active duty in 1975.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating






evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.

By virtue of the applicant’s assignment to Vietnam between November 1971 and May 1972, he is entitled to three bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, which is reflected on his 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Although the applicant’s medical treatment form indicates he was “WIA” in reality he was injured by local nationals who were, presumably, attempting to rob him of the payroll he was guarding. The applicant and the line of duty investigation report confirm the circumstances under which the applicant was wounded. There was clearly no “enemy” action involved and the applicant was not participating, at that time, in any “combat” action. Hence the Board concludes that the applicant’s injuries were not incurred under circumstances for which the Purple Heart was intended to be awarded.

2. The fact that neither the applicant’s local commander, nor the commander of the medical treatment facility which tended to his injuries, awarded the applicant the Purple Heart, tends to support the Board’s conclusion that an award of the Purple Heart was not appropriate.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.








DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

NOTE: Officials at the ARBA Support Division in St. Louis are requested to administratively correct the applicant’s 1975 separation document to reflect award of three bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___AAO_ __RWA__ __KYF __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070219
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020404
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000829

    Original file (20150000829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has the piece of shrapnel that was taken from his arm while at the hospital. There is no medical evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in an active duty status. He provides a statement of support wherein one individual stated the applicant was wounded in the arm and had not shot himself.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017887

    Original file (20090017887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Standard Form 504 (Clinical Record - History) shows the applicant was injured on 2 March 1970 and received initial medical treatment at the 67th Evacuation Hospital. Within 2 days, military medical personnel annotated the applicant's medical chart to show he received his gunshot wound by an accidental shot from an M-16 rifle. Therefore, in the absence of military and medical records showing the applicant's injury resulted from enemy forces, there is insufficient evidence upon which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086676C070212

    Original file (2003086676C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned. The Military Police Report contained in his records shows that the applicant and another soldier went into a bar and when told that the bar was closed, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023516

    Original file (20100023516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His contemporaneous DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following entries: * item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was transferred from Vietnam on 14 February 1968 to the 106th General Hospital, Japan in a patient status; however, the nature of his injury/illness is undetermined * item 40 (Wounds) does not list any combat injuries * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart 7. His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004493

    Original file (20150004493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150004493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides * self-authored statement * Standard Form (SF) 601 (Immunization Record) * page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DD Form 214 * letter, dated 3 April 2015, to the applicant from the Army Review Boards Agency * letter, dated 23 April 2015, to the applicant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with enclosure (Patient Inquiry) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004967

    Original file (20140004967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his helicopter was shot down three times in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). g. On 9 October 1972, he was released from active duty. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show he was, on 3 separate occasions, awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014025

    Original file (20070014025.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although the applicant injured his knee while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006341

    Original file (20110006341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Silver Star, Bronze Star Medal, and two awards of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was recommended for, authorized, or awarded the Silver Star, Bronze Star Medal, or Purple Heart. A timeline of his military service that, in pertinent part, shows he was: * inducted in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070472C070402

    Original file (2002070472C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there is no direct medical evidence to show that the applicant received medical treatment for the claimed wounds, the physician from his October 1991 flight physical indicated that the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion. This would not be inconsistent with Warrant Officer D___’s description of the applicant’s wounds.The Board concludes that any reasonable doubt concerning the applicant’s eligibility for award of the Purple Heart should be resolved in his favor. That all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016304

    Original file (20130016304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He and his buddy jumped out of the helicopter before they landed and they were under fire as soon as they hit the ground. The hand-written diary the applicant submitted contains entries from May 1966 to 9 July (1967). There is no evidence to show this is shrapnel or that he received it as a result of enemy action.