Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Member | |
Ms. Barbara J. Lutz | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Purple Heart and the Air Medal.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in the left hand and was medically evacuated to a hospital in Vietnam for treatment. He goes on to state that he spent the last few months in a helicopter flying supplies for the 4th Infantry Division.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 8 January 1969. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 11 June 1969, for duty as a light weapons infantryman with Company A, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 12 March 1970.
5. The available records show that he served as an infantryman during his entire tour in Vietnam and he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tour. He departed Vietnam on 10 June 1970 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty on 7 January 1971, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS). He had served 2 years of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two bronze service stars (he actually served in three campaigns and is entitled to three bronze service stars), Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal and the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device.
6. A review of the available records, as well as a search of records at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland, failed to reveal that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart or Air Medal for his service in Vietnam. They also fail to show that he was ever reported as a casualty, that he was wounded, or that he was treated for such a wound. His records contain no evidence of any derogatory information or disciplinary action.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation for the period of 1 October 1966 to 31 October 1969.
9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
10. That regulation also prescribed the criteria for award of the Air Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that award of the Air Medal is primarily intended to recognize those personnel who are on current crewmember or non-crewmember flying status which requires them to participate in aerial flight on a regular and frequent basis in the performance of their duties. However, it may also be awarded to certain other individuals whose combat duties require regular and frequent flying in other than a passenger status, or individuals who perform a particularly noteworthy act while performing the function of a crewmember, but who are not on flying status. These individuals must make a discernible contribution to the operational land combat mission or the mission of the aircraft in flight.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was wounded or injured in Vietnam during an action by enemy forces or that he was treated for such. Accordingly, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to correct his records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
2. Additionally, there is no evidence to show that he was recommended for, awarded, or is entitled to an award of the Air Medal. Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, the Board has no basis to correct his records to show that he was awarded the Air Medal.
3. However, the evidence of record does show that he is entitled to be awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and an additional bronze service star for wear on his already awarded VSM. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.
4. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 8 January 1969 through 7 January 1971. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
5. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned an additional bronze service star to be worn on his already awarded VSM; the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation; and the AGCM for the period of 8 January 1969 through 7 January 1971.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhl ___ ___bjl___ ___rvo __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Joann H. Langston____
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002068903 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/08/22 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
2. 64 | 107.0018/AM |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015603
His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and three Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090245C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although there are no orders present in the applicant's records to verify his claim that he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam, there is sufficient evidence available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080013C070215
However, the evidence of record does establish that he is entitled to be awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC and four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 14 November 1967 through 12 July 1969. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212
A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010447C070208
A review of the applicant’s flight records shows that his first award of the AM was awarded after completion of 35 flight hours. A computation of the applicant’s total combat flight hours (918) indicates that he should have received awards of the AM through the twenty-sixth award (AM with Numeral 26) up through 3 July 1971, the date of his last recorded flight. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show entitlement to the AM w/Numeral “26” for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011812
This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068780C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant’s separation medical examination indicates that the applicant sustained injuries in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was wounded or injured in Vietnam during an action by enemy forces. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...