Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068648C070402
Original file (2002068648C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068648

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Paula Mokulis Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.

APPLICANT STATES: That at the time he had an alcohol problem and was not aware of how it affected his behavior at the time. In support of his application he submits three third party letters of support.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in Detroit, Michigan, on 7 June 1977 for a period of 3 years, training as a field artilleryman, and assignment to Fort Sill, Oklahoma. He was transferred to Fort Sill to undergo his training.

On 3 August 1977, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent from his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.

On 10 February 1978, NJP was imposed against him for being drunk in quarters. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.

On 28 February 1978, NJP was imposed against him for disobeying a lawful order from a superior noncommissioned officer (NCO). His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.

On 6 March 1978, NJP was imposed against him for two specifications of disobeying a lawful order from an NCO. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay.

The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 18 May 1978 of one specification of being disrespectful in language towards an NCO, two specifications of striking an NCO and one specification of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 10 March to 20 March 1978. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 3 months, a forfeiture of pay and a BCD.

The applicant was transferred to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas to serve his confinement and was released on 2 August 1978. He was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky, and was placed on excess leave pending the appellate review of his case.

On 27 June 1979, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions, pursuant to the sentence of a special court-martial and was issued a BCD. He had served 1 year, 8 months and 17 days of total active service and had 121 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.

The third party statements submitted by the applicant serve to state that the applicant is self employed, hard working, and attends church.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

3. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.

4. The applicant’s contentions and third party statements of support have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his overall undistinguished record of service.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___fe ___ ___pm __ ___ra ___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068648
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/05/16
TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1979/06/27
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY BCD/SPCM
DISCHARGE REASON 105.0100/BCD
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 675 144.6800/A68.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074480C070403

    Original file (2002074480C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The convening authority did not agree with the recommendation of the investigating officer and directed that the applicant be tried by a general court-martial. Although his accomplice ended up with a less harsh sentence than he did, the applicant was granted an upgrade of his discharge from a BCD to a general discharge by the Army Clemency and Parole Board and he has not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080134C070215

    Original file (2002080134C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains no evidence that he was ever punished for this offense. On 28 January 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for clemency The available records contains no medical evidence and the applicant has provided no evidence that demonstrates he suffers from an illness or an injury that was either incurred in, or aggravated as a result of his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067733C070402

    Original file (2002067733C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The specifics are not present in the available records; however, his records do show that he was reduced to the pay grade of E-4 on that date. On 28 June 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the court-martial convening authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073141C070403

    Original file (2002073141C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was returned to Fort Myer on 11 October and on 13 October 1978, the suspended portion of his punishment for the NJP imposed on 27 July 1978 was vacated and he was reduced to the pay grade of E-3. On 9 January 1979, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Soldiers had to consent to separation under this program in order for commanders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071577C070402

    Original file (2002071577C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He departed Germany on 21 July 1978, en route to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with a report date of 24 August 1978. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL from 24 August 1978, until he was returned to military control on 7 September and charges were preferred against him for the absent without leave (AWOL) offense.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014299

    Original file (20080014299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He further contends that he should be issued a DD Form 215 which shows that he served in the Persian Gulf War. There is no evidence in his military records, and the applicant provided no evidence which shows he qualified for any campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066027C070421

    Original file (2001066027C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The available records do not contain any evidence that indicates he was ever coerced and he has provided no evidence to the contrary. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2001066027SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED20020521TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE19800627DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200 DISCHARGE REASONA60.00BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007013

    Original file (20080007013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 September 1977, while still in BCT, he was released from military control by reason of a voided enlistment due to fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant’s discharge was ever actually accomplished or that his discharge orders and DD Form 214 were ever published. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079464C070215

    Original file (2002079464C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 September 1978, NJP was imposed against him for stealing a case of C-Rations. However, all of his medical records are not present in the available records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001211C070206

    Original file (20050001211C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 25 January 1980, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them...