| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant has offered no evidence or argument in support of his application for an upgrade of his discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Omaha, Nebraska, on 7 June 1976, for a period of 4 years, training as an infantryman and assignment to the Berlin Brigade. He successfully completed his training and received assignment instructions to the Berlin Brigade in Germany. However, prior to his departure, he was accepted for assignment to the 3rd Infantry (Old Guard) at Fort Myer, Virginia. He waived his enlistment commitment and was transferred to Fort Myer on 4 December 1976.
On 9 March 1977, he stole three tires off of a fellow soldier’s car and nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for the offense. His punishment consisted of extra duty and restriction.
He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 7 June 1977 and to the pay grade of E-4 on 2 December 1977.
On 27 July 1978, NJP was imposed against him for being insubordinate and disrespectful in language towards a senior noncommissioned officer (NCO). His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3 (suspended for 90 days), a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
The applicant attended the Primary NCO Course at the NCO Academy at Fort Knox, Kentucky, on 6 October 1978 and was dismissed from the course on the first day, for conduct inconsistent with the requirements of leadership. The applicant was found to have in his possession three ounces of marijuana and drug paraphernalia (two pipes) containing marijuana residue. He was returned to Fort Myer on 11 October and on 13 October 1978, the suspended portion of his punishment for the NJP imposed on 27 July 1978 was vacated and he was reduced to the pay grade of E-3.
On 3 November 1978, NJP was imposed against him for the drug offense and his punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 9 January 1979, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicant’s inability to adapt emotionally to military life and his lack of self discipline. He informed the applicant of his rights, to include his right to decline the discharge.
After being afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel, the applicant voluntarily consented to accept a discharge under the EDP and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 22 January 1979 and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable condition on 26 January 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 and the EDP. He had served 2 years, 7 months and 20 days of total active service.
There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
The Department of the Army began testing the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP) in October 1973. In a message dated 8 November 1974 the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel announced the expansion of the EDP. The program provided for the separation of soldiers whose acceptability, performance of duty, and/or potential for continued effective service fall below the standards required for retention in the Army. Soldiers may be separated under this program when subjective evaluation of their commanders identifies them as lacking qualities for continued military service because of attitude, motivation, self-discipline, inability to adapt socially or emotionally, or failure to demonstrate promotion potential. Soldiers had to consent to separation under this program in order for commanders to separate them under the provisions of the EDP. Otherwise, a commander was required to separate soldiers under other provisions of the regulation, which in most cases resulted in a discharge under other than honorable conditions. There have never been any automatic provisions to upgrade such a discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s administrative discharge was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no violations of any of the applicant’s rights. Accordingly, the applicant’s discharge and the reasons therefor were appropriate under the circumstances.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__eja____ __kh____ __tbr____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073141 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1979/01/26 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH5 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | EDP |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 488 | 144.2400/A24.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052915C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: On 3 September 1978, the commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31, for failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention (Expeditious Discharge Program(EDP)), with a GD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008296
The commander stated he was recommending that the applicants service be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. Individuals discharged under the provisions of this paragraph may be awarded an honorable or general discharge. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012234
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 25 September 1978, the commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31, under the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Otherwise, a commander was required to separate Soldiers under other provisions of the regulation which in most cases resulted in an other than honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091014C070212
Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 3 August 1978, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 and the Expeditious Discharge Program. There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016654
On 23 January 1980, the applicants commander initiated action to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31, under the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017212
The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions for the period ending 22 October 1979 be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 4 October 1979, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service due to his failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-31, and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). There is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009337
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 14 August 1979 in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 (EDP), for failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention, and his service was characterized as under honorable conditions. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Considering that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066530C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 17 December 1976, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). He also acknowledged that he could only be discharged under the EDP if he agreed to the discharge and that he could withdraw his consent anytime prior to approval by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010122
On 27 March 1979, his immediate commander advised him that he intended to initiate action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP)) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of failing to meet and maintain acceptable standards, lack of minimum self-discipline to handle personal affairs and to perform his duties as a Soldier, and incidents of minor misconduct prejudicial to the good order and discipline. On...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003107
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 28 June 1979, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31, under the expeditious discharge program (EDP). There is no evidence that the...