Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067905C070402
Original file (2002067905C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067905


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Joyce A. Hall Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications, which preclude reenlistment. In support of his application he submits various copies of award certificates and a copy of his college transcript.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that the reenlistment code of 3C is prohibiting him from attending warrant officer flight school. He had a good record and would like to continue a career as an aviator but his reenlistment code is stopping him.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 9 May 1985, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years. He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76C10 (Equipment Records and Parts Specialist).

5. On or about 17 October 1985, the applicant departed for an assignment in Germany. He was assigned to Company C, 78th Engineer Company. On
13 May 1985, while assigned to a unit in Germany, the applicant voluntarily extended his tour in Germany. On or about 5 October 1987, the applicant departed Germany, and was reassigned to a unit at Fort Drum, New York.

6. Between 11 March 1988 and 3 June 1988, the applicant was counseled on
four separate occasions for indebtedness, poor duty performance, negative attitude, and for his inability to follow instructions.

7. On 8 June 1988, the applicant’s commander initiated action to bar him from reenlistment. The commander’s recommendation was based on the applicant’s numerous counseling sessions for indebtedness, poor duty performance, inability to follow instructions, and for his negative attitude.

8. The applicant signed the DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), which stated that he was counseled on the implications of the action and his right to appeal. He elected not to appeal. The DA Form 4126-R is the only information found in the applicant’s record concerning his bar to reenlistment. The applicant’s separation information is not available.

9. On 13 June 1988, the appropriate authority approved the bar to reenlistment.

10. On 5 December 1988, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve in pay grade E-4, under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200 paragraph 16-12. He completed 3 years, 6 months, and 5 days of creditable active service. He was assigned a reentry code of RE-3C.

11. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 16 covers discharge caused by changes in services obligations. Paragraph 16-12 applies to the Holiday Early Transition Program and release from active duty.

12. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

13. RE-3C applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, due to failure to meet grade and service requirements. However, failure to meet grade and service requirements was not the applicant’s case. He received a local bar to reenlistment.

14. RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 9, 10, 13, and 14 of Army Regulation 635-200.

15. Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). Therefore, since enlistment criteria do change, and since the applicant has the right to apply for a waiver, it is suggested that he periodically visit his local recruiting station to determine if he should apply for a waiver.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. It is the opinion of this Board, that the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) was erroneously annotated with a reentry code RE-3C.

2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant received a local bar to reenlistment. Therefore, based on the regulation, the applicant should have received a reentry code of RE-3.



3. In the interest of justice, and in the light of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION
:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214, to show RE-3 as his reentry code.

BOARD VOTE:

__AAO__ __KWL__ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Arthur A. Omartian___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067905
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/24
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609487C070209

    Original file (9609487C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also, he requests correction of his records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity (USAEEA), in a comment, opined that the reentry code RE-3C is correct as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 in accordance with table 3-6, Army Regulation 601-210, dated 14 February 1990. The reentry code of RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028659

    Original file (20100028659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 March 1989, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071669C070402

    Original file (2002071669C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 6 of that regulation provides for barring from reenlistment individuals whose continued active duty is not in the best interest of the military service. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contention that he was discharged from his unit to finish his college education, evidence of record shows that he voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077783C070215

    Original file (2002077783C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was given the correct RE code when he separated from the Regular Army as an E-4 with over 7 years of active service. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he completed training in MOSs 52D and/or 63B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059599C070421

    Original file (2001059599C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Accordingly, on 10 May 1990, the applicant was separated from the Army under the provisions of chapter 16-5b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a locally imposed bar to reenlistment with an honorable discharge. This includes anyone with a locally imposed bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073076C070403

    Original file (2002073076C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071672C070402

    Original file (2002071672C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Rule K states that an enlisted soldier barred from reenlistment in the Army National Guard or the USAR or on whom a bar to reenlistment has been initiated is a nonwaivable disqualification. On 21 August 2002, Mrs. Roberts from the AGR Accessions Team, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command indicated in a phone conversation that if an individual does not have a current bar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009906

    Original file (20080009906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 2-22 of this regulation, in effect at the time, states, in pertinent part, that personnel in grade E-2, regardless of years of service completed, are not authorized reenlistment. Since he had completed over 4 months active service, in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 he was not authorized reenlistment and was to be assigned an RE code of RE-3C. These individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084646C070212

    Original file (2003084646C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her reentry (RE) code of 4 be upgraded to a 2, that her separation code be changed, and that the bar to reenlistment be removed from her records. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant requested to be discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 5b after being barred from reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was given RE code 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065249C070421

    Original file (2001065249C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 8 January 1988, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged prior to his normal expiration of term of service (ETS) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The separation authority’s approval of the applicant’s recommendation for discharge is not present in his file. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and was...