Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067457C070402
Original file (2002067457C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 30 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067457

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he was discharged on 2 January 2000 instead of 8 December 1998.

APPLICANT STATES: That his expiration of term of service (ETS) was 8 December 1999; however, he did not finish clearing post and actually did not get out until 2 January 2000. He goes on to state that he was supposed to appear before a medical board but it was disapproved due to the time he had left in the service and did not get his separation orders until 8 December 1999. He was granted a 30-day extension to clear and he never thought anything about it until he received a charge for occupying government housing after his ETS, which he just discovered during tax time. He was informed by officials at the Veterans Administration to apply to the Board to have his records corrected.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in Montgomery, Alabama, on 7 November 1985 for a period of 3 years and training as a food service specialist. He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 1 November 1990.

On 8 December 1994, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and assignment to Alaska. He was transferred to Alaska on 26 October 1995.

On 3 December 1998, the applicant completed a Transition Center questionnaire in which he indicated that his ETS was 7 December 1998, that he had been flagged since June 1998 (records show flagged for overweight), and that he intended to sell back 41 days of accrued leave.

Orders were published on 4 December 1998, which directed his discharge on 8 December 1998, due to ETS. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 8 December 1998, was paid for 41 days of accrued leave and he signed his report of separation (DD Form 214) to that effect.

A review of his records fails to show any indication that he was granted an extension of service or was held till 2 January 2000. The last ETS date indicated in his records was 8 December 1998.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s ETS was 8 December 1998, the date he was honorably discharged, as indicated in his discharge orders and the DD Form 214 that he authenticated with his signature. Accordingly, absent proof to show that he was extended past his ETS as he claims, the Board finds no basis to change his discharge date.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___ao___ __teo ___ ___hof __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067457
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/04/30
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 190 110.0100/CHG DISCH DATE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084908C070212

    Original file (2003084908C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of previous application to correct his military records by backdating his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of chief warrant officer three (CW3). After hearing the testimony and reviewing the evidence presented, the board of officers found the applicant innocent of the allegation that he had abused the illegal drug – marijuana, that his unknowing ingestion was from an over-the-counter product called Hemp Liquid Gold. Army Regulation 600-85,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077227C070215

    Original file (2002077227C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That she be authorized an antedated reenlistment. In that response, the unit retention NCO stated that the applicant was transferred out of her unit while she was within her 90-day window to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071134C070402

    Original file (2002071134C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 23 February 2001 MFR indicates the company commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 after a rehabilitation team determined the applicant was a rehabilitation failure. The regulation does not specify a time limit that must be met between the date the soldier is declared a rehabilitation failure and the date the separation packet is initiated. The regulation does not specify a time limit that must be met between the date the soldier...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080962C070215

    Original file (2002080962C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that she was unjustly denied enlistment in the pay grade of E-5 because of an erroneously initiated Declination of Continued Service Statement (DA Form 4991-R). While the applicant may now believe that she made a mistake by not completing her foreign service tour and having a DCSS initiated against her, the fact remains that she did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010451C070208

    Original file (20040010451C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his correct date of rank, BASD (basic active service date), and his DIEMS (date initially entered active service date). The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s records contain a DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States) which shows the applicant’s date of enlistment in the DEP as 29 February 1996 and his enlistment and active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065227C070421

    Original file (2001065227C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was retired by reason of being medically unfit for retention and that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) at that time. This bulletin referenced an Under Secretary of Defense memorandum which established the policy prohibiting a service member who shows symptoms associated with Persian Gulf illness from being retired or separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057392C070420

    Original file (2001057392C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 May 2001, the applicant submitted a request for a 30-day waiver of the service remaining requirement for promotion to the pay grade of E-6. This was not the case and the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record or the evidence submitted with his application that he has been unjustly denied a promotion.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006755

    Original file (20050006755.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-3 states an enlisted Soldier may not be referred for, or continue, physical disability processing when action has been started under any regulatory provision which authorizes a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. When the medical treatment facility (MTF) commander or attending medical officer determines a Soldier being processed for administrative separation (to include separation under chapter 14) does not meet the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005450C070208

    Original file (20040005450C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Statement, Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum (DA Form 5261-4-R), Reserve Component Pay Support Office Student Loan Repayment Memorandum, Draft Response to Congressional Inquiry, Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Application (DD Form 2475) and Employer Acknowledgement of Wage Withholding Memorandum. The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061180C070421

    Original file (2001061180C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Records show that the applicant was properly notified of intent to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, that he was afforded the opportunity to have his case considered by a board of officers and to be represented by counsel, that his case was heard by a board of officers, and that only after receiving the recommendations of the board of officers, did the appropriate separation authority direct the applicant’s discharge. The Board considered the applicant’s...