| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be refunded the monies already collected from him as a result of overpayment of basic allowance for housing (BAH).
3. The applicant states that he tried to get his BAH issue resolved beginning with turning in his divorce papers immediately after his October 1999 divorce. He was either told that he was receiving the correct BAH or his cancellation/remission packet was lost.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 1988. On an unknown date, he married. Apparently he divorced in October 1999 while stationed in Korea. He apparently received the divorce decree on 22 October 1999 and the following Monday his battalion Personnel and Administration Center had him fill out the paperwork to change his BAH.
5. The applicant’s BAH rate never changed until mid-month January 2001, when he was charged for a debt in the amount of $6,050.16 for overpayment of BAH. A total of $1,231.25 was taken from his January 2001 pay. Apparently, his November or December 2000 leave and earnings statement indicated he had a Government indebtedness.
6. On 6 February 2001, the applicant completed and his commander signed an Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness, DA Form 3508-R.
7. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Special Actions Branch, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). That office stated that the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R was apparently lost several times. It was finally received by that office on 14 November 2001. On 19 November 2001, that office approved remission or cancellation of the applicant’s indebtedness in the amount of the debt uncollected at the time his remission application was submitted. The amount that had been collected prior to the commander’s signature on the application could not be considered for remission or cancellation. However, if the portion of debt repaid had not been collected prior to the commander’s signature on the DA Form 3508-R, that office would have favorably considered the entire debt based on the supporting documentation presented.
8. A copy of the advisory was provided to the applicant for comment. He concurred in the advisory opinion.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s commander confirmed that the applicant took immediate action to inform the Army he had divorced and to change his BAH rate. The Army took no action to change his BAH rate until over a year later, by which time the applicant accrued a debt for overpayment of BAH in the amount of $6,050.16. He took immediate steps to satisfy the requirement for submitting an application for remission or cancellation of his indebtedness when his indebtedness first became known. The packet was lost for an unknown reason and was not received at PERSCOM until November 2001.
2. PERSCOM approved remission or cancellation of the applicant’s indebtedness in the amount of the debt uncollected at the time his remission application was submitted. The amount that had been collected prior to the commander’s signature on the application could not be considered for remission or cancellation. However, PERSCOM stated that if the portion of debt repaid had not been collected prior to the commander’s signature on the DA Form 3508-R, it would have favorably considered the entire debt based on the supporting documentation presented.
3. While the Board recognizes that the Army is not liable for the erroneous actions of its officers, agents, or employees, even though committed in the performance of their duties, the Board believes that it would be in the interest of justice and equity to grant the full relief requested.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. showing the applicant completed and his commander signed a DA Form 3508-R on 1 December 2000 requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness for a total amount of $6,050.16; and
b. showing that the DA From 3508-R was received and processed by the appropriate office at PERSCOM and approved for remission or cancellation of the total amount of $6,050.16 prior to any collection being made by DFAS.
2. That, as a result of the above corrections, any collections made by DFAS for this indebtedness be refunded to the applicant as an erroneous collection.
BOARD VOTE:
__fne___ __rwa___ __pm____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002067423 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020516 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.10 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076096C070215
In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with supporting documents; a memorandum from Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM); a notice of indebtedness from the installation finance office with supporting documents; an e-mail notification; and a copy of his May 2002 leave and earnings statement (LES). The letter also informed the applicant that $2,348.60 of the debt...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072809C070403
The applicant’s overpayment of BAH during the period 1 July 2001 through 30 September 2001 totaled $500.00. The applicant provided a memorandum, dated 3 December 2001, from her Commanding Officer recommending approval of her request for remission of debt. That office also states that approval of the collected portion of the applicant’s debt, $420.53, could not be granted based on Army Regulation 600-4, paragraph 1-11(b)(1).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101211C070208
The applicant states that he was provided the incorrect form in November 2000 when he applied for remission of his debt and consequently, the money was taken from his pay. That command indicated that PERSCOM had returned the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness in July 2001 because it was incomplete and stated that the application provided to them with the request for an advisory opinion was also incomplete. His March 2003 LES indicates that his indebtedness...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065380C070402
On 3 March 2001, the applicant completed and his commander signed an Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness, DA Form 3508-R. At that time he owed two debts totaling $4,496.80 due to overpayment of his pay and allowances when his PEBD was calculated incorrectly, $1,198.88 of which had been collected. The Board believes that had the PERSCOM acted upon the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of this indebtedness prior to any collections being made by DFAS,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059889C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be reimbursed $6,702.67 collected from his earnings to pay back a debt to the government for overpayment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The applicant was also informed by the letter that $6,702.67 of the debt collected prior to the commander’s suspension of the debt collection, could not be considered for remission or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212
The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072811C070403
It states that the finance office in Panama that submitted the applicant’s remission/cancellation of indebtedness packet erroneously stated that the uncollected portion of his debt was $542.43, when in fact it was only $482.16. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078402C070215
Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. Further, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. In the opinion of the Board, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073826C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. She was also informed that...