| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) enrollment be terminated.
3. The applicant states that when he retired from the U. S. Postal Service (USPS) on 3 January 1999 he decided to combine his two retirements and notified the required offices. His military retired pay stopped and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) paid him his correct retired pay. However, sometime in 1999 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) started sending him monthly bills for unpaid SBP premiums. He had known about the one-time opportunity to terminate his enrollment but did not believe he had to submit a request as he knew he was retiring from the Postal Service during the one-year opportunity to do so and would be discontinuing his military retired pay. He believed that his choosing to terminate all of his Army pay benefits on 3 January 1999 included the SBP. His spouse has provided her concurrence with his request to terminate the SBP.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered the Army in 1956 as an enlisted member. He was appointed a warrant officer in August 1967. He retired on 1 September 1976. At that time he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage, reduced base amount. He apparently was employed by the USPS soon thereafter. He retired from the USPS on 2 January 1999, waiving military retired pay in favor of civil service retired pay.
5. OPM notified DFAS that the applicant did not elect annuity coverage under his civil service retirement.
6. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. It provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was permanent and irrevocable in the category that was elected.
7. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(d) states, in effect, that if a retiree waives his military retired pay for the purpose of receiving civil service retired pay, an SBP annuity will be payable if that retiree does not notify OPM that he desires any spouse surviving him to receive a civil service annuity.
8. Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from the SBP. Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. It appears the applicant may not have been properly counseled concerning his civil service SBP benefits/obligations prior to his civil service retirement. It appears that by the time he learned that since he did not elect civil service SBP his military SBP remained in effect his one-year window of opportunity to terminate his enrollment in the SBP ended.
2. The applicant believed his choosing to terminate all of his Army pay benefits on 3 January 1999 included the SBP. The Board concludes that it would be equitable to show that he properly requested termination of the SBP under the provisions of Public Law 105-85 on 3 January 1999 and that his request was received in the appropriate office in January 1999, to be effective 1 February 1999, the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which it was received. SBP premiums for the month of January 1999 would still be due.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant properly requested termination of his SBP under the provisions of Public Law 105-85 on 3 January 1999 and that his request was received in the appropriate office in January 1999 to be effective 1 February 1999.
2. That the applicant be advised the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
BOARD VOTE:
__inw___ __rjw___ __gjw___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Irene N. Wheelwright
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001066024 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020312 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.03 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061810C070421
The applicant states that a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) representative told him, because he was receiving 60 percent disability compensation, his spouse would receive a more generous annuity from the VA if he died than she would from the SBP. It appears the applicant was improperly counseled by a VA representative concerning DIC benefits, thereby causing him to request termination of his SBP coverage in the belief his spouse would receive a more generous annuity from the VA no...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01269
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01269 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to terminate his spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) retroactive to the date of his Civil Service (CS) retirement (24 May 1973). PL 92-425,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075437C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he terminated his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage and he be refunded all premiums. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057250C070420
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Since the divorce decree stated that the FSM abandoned the applicant’s mother, the FSM presumably intended to provide spouse coverage for his new spouse rather than former spouse coverage for the applicant’s mother. His new spouse pre-deceased him and he presumably terminated his SBP coverage in March 1999 because of her death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015823
h. DFAS letter to the applicant, dated 4 June 2014 (Exhibit L), that notified him of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay account based on documentation received from him. However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant notified DFAS concerning an error in his SBP coverage from the time that he retired from the U.S. Army on 25 March 2009 through May 2014. On 4 June 2014, DFAS notified the applicant of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841
The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569
Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012857
She also elected to not participate in the SBP. The applicant contends that she declined her participation in the SBP when she requested retired pay at age 60 and should be reimbursed the premiums she has paid. Accordingly, she may submit an election to terminate her enrollment in SBP, providing her spouse concurs, with an effective date anytime from 1 April 2013 to 30 March 2014.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588
The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage. On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid; b. showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...