Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065091C070421
Original file (2001065091C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065091

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Joyce A. Hall Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show his name as S----- M---- instead of J---- L---- J------, Jr.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that at the age of thirteen he left his home in Indiana and relocated to Smithville, North Carolina. After his relocation to Smithville he lived under the name of J---- L---- J------, Jr. The applicant submits a copy of a birth certificate and a copy of an Honorable Discharge certificate in support of his application.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 26 June 1964, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years. He was inducted under the name of J----L----J------, Jr. On 27 January 1967, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army under the same name of J---- L---- J------, Jr.

On 9 October 1970, the applicant was discharged from military service under the name of J---- L---- J------, Jr., in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. He had completed a total of 4 years, 9 months and 16 days of creditable active service and had 546 days of lost time.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s official military record shows that he was inducted and that he served his entire military career under the name of J---- L---- J------, Jr. His record also shows that he was discharged from the military under the same name. The documents submitted by the applicant are insufficient and therefore, does not warrant a correction of official military records.


3. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ __clg___ __rks___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065091
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020402
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076612C070215

    Original file (2002076612C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show his birth name. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065639C070421

    Original file (2001065639C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that his home of record (HOR) at the time of his enlistment was Houston, Texas, vice Lawton, Oklahoma. It states, in pertinent part, that the HOR address entered on the enlistment contract will be the address declared by the The applicable regulations state that the HOR at the time of entry on active duty will be the actual home or permanent home and that a temporary address will not be entered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064910C070421

    Original file (2001064910C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059851C070421

    Original file (2001059851C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: He does not provide the baptismal certificate which evidently changed both his first name and the spelling of his last name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072952C070403

    Original file (2002072952C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant provides no evidence that suggests the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served. In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065714C070421

    Original file (2001065714C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058768C070421

    Original file (2001058768C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his name be changed on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, dated 23 June 1955. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057338C070420

    Original file (2001057338C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank of corporal. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072637C070403

    Original file (2002072637C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to reflect his time as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy. The version in effect at the time, dated 1 July 1981, paragraph 1.4a(3) stated that a DD Form 214 would be prepared for each cadet of the U. S. Military Academy who fails to graduate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064551C070421

    Original file (2001064551C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record confirms that the SSN listed in the applicant’s enlistment contract, the records created upon his enlistment, and the records and documents published and maintained throughout his active duty tenure is consistent with the one recorded in the DD Form 214 issued to him upon his separation. In this case, the SSN recorded in the applicant’s enlistment contract, the military records created upon his enlistment in...