Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072952C070403
Original file (2002072952C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 6 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072952

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Ms. Paula Mokulis Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be changed to show his correct social security account number (SSAN).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the SSAN listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) is incorrect. In support of his application, he submits copies of the following documents: SSAN card; medicare health insurance card; and certificate of birth.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 4 January 1967, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States. He continuously served on active duty for 1 year, 11 months, and 2 days, until being honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 5 December 1968.

A review of the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) shows that the service number was used as the primary identification number at the time he entered active duty, and this was the identification number listed in his induction paperwork.

The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation from the Army lists a SSAN in addition to his service number. The SSAN entered on the applicant’s separation document is consistent with the one entered in the record created on him upon his entry on active duty, and in the orders and documents prepared and published on him throughout his tenure on active duty.

The applicant provided a Xeroxed copy of his SSAN card; however, he did not provide a statement from Social Security Administration officials explaining the difference between his current SSAN and the one under which he performed his military service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant provides no evidence that suggests the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served. Further, he offers no explanation from Social Security Administration officials as to when and why his SSAN was changed, or why it is now different from the one recorded in his military records.


2. The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice. Thus, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___LLS__ __PM___ __DPH__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072952
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/08/06
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 109.0900
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072920C070403

    Original file (2002072920C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant provides no evidence that suggests the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served. In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076046C070215

    Original file (2002076046C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074205C070403

    Original file (2002074205C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079100C070215

    Original file (2002079100C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, it finds insufficient evidence to show that the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served. In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074238C070403

    Original file (2002074238C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued for this period of active duty service shows that the applicant was discharged on 6 June 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of special court-martial conviction, and that he received a bad conduct discharge (BCD). The Board finds no evidence to show that the SSAN recorded on the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 27 April 1978, was not the one under which he entered into and performed this period of active duty service. In this case, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071133C070402

    Original file (2002071133C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be changed to show his correct social security account number (SSAN). However, it finds insufficient evidence that suggests the SSAN recorded in his military records was in error at the time he served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068774C070402

    Original file (2002068774C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his rank, pay grade, and social security account number (SSAN) listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086790C070212

    Original file (2003086790C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show his correct social security account number (SSAN). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083377C070212

    Original file (2003083377C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: This is also the SSAN that was recorded in his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20), and other service records created during his tenure on active duty. The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date he was separated lists the SSAN he now claims is incorrect in Item 3 (Social Security Number); and Item 5 (Grade, Rate of Rank) contains the entry PFC, which confirms he held this rank on that date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063164C070421

    Original file (2001063164C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 June 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served in the Army using SSAN #1 during his entire period of service. Lacking independent verification from the Social Security Administration that confirms that the SSAN recorded in the applicant’s Army record was in error at the time it was used, the Board finds no error in the existing Army military records and no basis for changing those...