Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072637C070403
Original file (2002072637C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072637

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Ms. Gail J. Wire Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to reflect his time as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy.

APPLICANT STATES: That he needs his DD Form 214 amended for his federal employee records. He provides his U. S. Military Academy academic records and DD Form 214 as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered the U. S. Military Academy in 1984. He graduated and was commissioned and he entered active duty on 25 May 1988. He was discharged upon completing his required active service on 30 June 1992 after completing 4 years, 1 month, and 6 days of net active service with no prior active service and no prior inactive service.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The version in effect at the time, dated 1 July 1981, paragraph 1.4a(3) stated that a DD Form 214 would be prepared for each cadet of the U. S. Military Academy who fails to graduate. Table 2-1, DD Form 214 Preparation Instructions, item 18h, stated that, when the separatee was a cadet, an entry would be made in item 18, Remarks, that “Item 12 includes service as a cadet, USMA, from (date from entrance in USMA to date of separation).” The current version, dated 15 September 2000, contains similar instructions, i.e., an entry will be made in item 18, Remarks, for a soldier who has cadet status, that “Block 12c includes service as a USMA cadet from (date) to (date). Service not creditable for any purpose in commissioned officer status.”

The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, chapter 01, states that service as a cadet or midshipman at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member. It is not creditable for a commissioned or warrant officer who held no concurrent enlisted and/or Reserve status.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. There are no regulatory provisions (nor were there at the time the applicant separated), to indicate time spent in the U. S. Military Academy on the DD Form 214 for a graduate of the Academy.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JLP__ __HOF__ __GJW__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072637
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/23
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075732C070403

    Original file (2002075732C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 8 April 1983, the Superintendent informed the applicant that, as a result of a hearing by an IO on 17 January 1983, he was found deficient in conduct for receiving 160 demerits for the period 1 June 1982 through 30 November 1982. The Board notes that the applicant's Officer Record Brief shows his BASD as 13 July 1983. The Board cannot determine from the available records if this is his correct PEBD (the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the USAR effective 22 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479

    Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * transcripts from the USMA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008113

    Original file (20140008113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Military Academy Form 3-239-R (Academic Transcript), dated 3 June 1987 * DD Form 214 (Member Copy) for the period ending 6 January 1989 * Standard Form 50-B, dated 9 January 2005 * National Personnel Records Center correspondence, dated 3 September 2007 * Department of Veterans Affairs correspondence, dated 28 February 2014 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-120, in effect at the time, prescribed procedures whereby an officer on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006417C070206

    Original file (20050006417C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his time in service for pay and retirement purposes be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy (USMA). It states service as a cadet at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member. If the circumstances in those "precedent" cases had been similar to the applicant's (i.e., enlisted persons who attended the USMA during their initial enlistment, graduated from the USMA, served only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089082C070403

    Original file (2003089082C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that a statement be placed in Item 18 (Remarks) of his separation document (DD Form 214) that reflects the time he served as a cadet at the United States Military Academy (USMA) from 1 July 1983 through 27 May 1987. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he understands that his time served as a cadet at the USMA does not affect the service dates entered in Item 12 (Record of Service) of his DD Form 214 and does not count as creditable service as an officer. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001519

    Original file (20130001519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed Air Assault School during the period he was a cadet. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered USMA as a cadet on 28 June 1989 and graduated on 29 May 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005148

    Original file (20120005148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he attended the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he attended the USMA. In the absence of evidence showing his service as a USMA cadet was improperly omitted from his DD Form 214, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.