Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064669C070421
Original file (2001064669C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 24 January 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064669

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. George D. Paxson Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reenlistment (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment.

APPLICANT STATES: That he is trying to enlist in the Reserves. He provides no supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

After having had prior service in the U. S. Army Reserve and the Army National Guard, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 April 1986.

On 29 November 1988, the applicant received a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment. Numerous infractions of discipline had been cited as the reason for the bar including operating a privately owned vehicle without a valid U. S. Army Europe driver’s license, spousal abuse and failing to attend mandatory meetings about this abuse, poor performance, and missing duties.

On 29 November 1988, the applicant requested early separation based on his inability to overcome the deficiencies listed in his bar to reenlistment. His request was approved and on 21 December 1988 he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, locally imposed bar to reenlistment and given an RE code of 3. He had completed a total of 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days of creditable active service and had no lost time.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Soldiers with a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment fall into this category.

Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210, Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. In view of the fact that the applicant separated with a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment in effect, the assigned reenlistment code of 3 was and still is appropriate. The applicant was disqualified from reenlistment, but the disqualification is waivable.

3. Since enlistment criteria does change, and since an individual has the right to apply for a waiver, the applicant should periodically visit his local recruiting station to determine if he should apply for a waiver.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__gdp___ __wtm___ __rtd___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064669
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020124
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063995C070421

    Original file (2001063995C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his locally imposed bar to reenlistment be removed and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to a more favorable RE code. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067905C070402

    Original file (2002067905C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The applicant signed the DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), which stated that he was counseled on the implications of the action and his right to appeal. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017031C070206

    Original file (20050017031C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service by virtue of being separated from the service with non-waivable disqualifications such as persons with a local bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086763C070212

    Original file (2003086763C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. At the time, RE code 3C applied to persons not qualified for continued Army service because they did not meet the reentry grade and service criteria of Army Regulation 601-210.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084646C070212

    Original file (2003084646C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her reentry (RE) code of 4 be upgraded to a 2, that her separation code be changed, and that the bar to reenlistment be removed from her records. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant requested to be discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 5b after being barred from reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was given RE code 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100592C070208

    Original file (2004100592C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100592 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106838C070208

    Original file (2004106838C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 September 1991, the applicant's commander formally counseled her concerning his intent and reason for requesting that she receive a bar to reenlistment. On 17 April 1992, the applicant was discharged by reason of expiration of term of service characterized as honorable and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077783C070215

    Original file (2002077783C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was given the correct RE code when he separated from the Regular Army as an E-4 with over 7 years of active service. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he completed training in MOSs 52D and/or 63B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507486C070209

    Original file (9507486C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. On 1 January 1996, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his reentry code. There is no evidence that the applicant has applied through his recruiter for a waiver.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071669C070402

    Original file (2002071669C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 6 of that regulation provides for barring from reenlistment individuals whose continued active duty is not in the best interest of the military service. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contention that he was discharged from his unit to finish his college education, evidence of record shows that he voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the...