| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, remission or cancellation of indebtedness ($855.83) incurred as a result of overpayment for Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) during the period 8 January 1995 to 14 May 1995.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that when he returned from Ranger School he settled his temporary duty (TDY) vouchers as directed. However, in July 1995 he received an indebtedness notice on his Leave and Earnings Statement for overpayment of BAS received while attending Ranger School. He contends that he made numerous attempts to either collect or cancel the debt. However, he was told there was nothing he could do and that it would be taken out of his pay. He contends that he turned in his settlement voucher to stop the collection payment process. He also contends that he was told that the debt was suspended but queried in the finance computer for collection. He further states that in September 1996, he out processed from Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and cleared finance without any financial obligations due the Government.
In support of his application, he submits a letter, dated 11 October 2001, from the Chief, Special Actions Branch of U.S. Total Army Personnel Command; a letter, dated 13 August 2001, from the Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 6th Area Support Group; Sections I, VI, VII and VIII of a DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness), dated 9 August 2001; a letter, dated 10 August 2001, from the Legal Assistance Officer, Headquarters, 21st Theater Support Group; a Memorandum for Record, dated 6 August 2001, from the Commanding Officer, Headquarters, Special Operations Command Europe; DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated
7 August 2001, executed by the applicant; DD Form 139 (Pay Adjustment Authorization), dated 13 July 2001; DD Forms 1610 (Request and Authorization for TDY of DOD Personnel), dated 15 December 1994 and 21 May 1995; TDY Travel Advance Voucher Summaries, dated 8 January 1995 and 29 December 1994; DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 18 May 1995; Travel Voucher, dated 6 August 1995; Travel Voucher Summary, dated 7 June 1995; DD Forms 1475 (Basic Allowance for Subsistence - Certification), for the months of January, February, March and April 1995; out processing document, dated 16 September 1996; and copies of Leave and Earnings Statements for the period January 1995 through July 2001.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Army in the rank of sergeant first class (pay grade E-7).
The applicant attended Ranger Training at Fort Benning, Georgia, during the period 8 January 1995 through 14 May 1995.
In July 1995, the applicant was notified of his overpayment for BAS during the period 8 January 1995 through 14 May 1995, which totaled $855.83.
On 9 August 2001, the applicant executed a DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission of Cancellation of Indebtedness) based on injustice.
On 11 October 2001, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command disapproved the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of the debt.
The applicant’s pay records show that the debt was suspended until October 2001 and that the debt was collected in full over a three month period.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and it is concluded:
1. The applicant received overpayment of allowances for BAS in the amount of $855.83.
2. On 11 October 2001, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command disapproved the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of the debt.
3. The applicant’s pay records show that the debt was collected in December 2001.
4. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he made numerous attempts to either collect or cancel the debt. However, failure of the system to properly collect the debt in a timely manner, in this case, does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for paying back what he knew he was overpaid. No justification has been established to reimburse the applicant the overpayment collected against this just debt.
5. Based on the foregoing, the applicant has not convinced this Board that collection of the overpayment was unjust or that the overpayment should otherwise not have been collected.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
MHM___ KAN_____ DPH_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001064532 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020514 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.1200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072809C070403
The applicant’s overpayment of BAH during the period 1 July 2001 through 30 September 2001 totaled $500.00. The applicant provided a memorandum, dated 3 December 2001, from her Commanding Officer recommending approval of her request for remission of debt. That office also states that approval of the collected portion of the applicant’s debt, $420.53, could not be granted based on Army Regulation 600-4, paragraph 1-11(b)(1).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067423C070402
That office stated that the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R was apparently lost several times. a. showing the applicant completed and his commander signed a DA Form 3508-R on 1 December 2000 requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness for a total amount of $6,050.16; and b. showing that the DA From 3508-R was received and processed by the appropriate office at PERSCOM and approved for remission or cancellation of the total amount of $6,050.16 prior to any collection being made by DFAS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010821
The evidence of record further confirms the applicant submitted an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness as soon as he was made aware of the debt based on hardship and injustice. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's record to show his application for cancellation or remission of debt was approved based on hardship and injustice, and to cancel his debt to the Government, to include reimbursing him for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078402C070215
Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. Further, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. In the opinion of the Board, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018512
The applicant states she was ordered to active duty from North Carolina where she resided in December 2006 to perform a contingency operations temporary tour of active duty (COTTAD) in support of Operation Noble Eagle with duty at the Pentagon. DFAS's multiple letters stated her claim for per diem for meals was not authorized since she resided within commuting distance to the Pentagon. She maintained residency in both a local address her HOR in Maryland and the residence in North...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059889C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be reimbursed $6,702.67 collected from his earnings to pay back a debt to the government for overpayment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The applicant was also informed by the letter that $6,702.67 of the debt collected prior to the commander’s suspension of the debt collection, could not be considered for remission or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060263C070421
He subsequently received a letter from the finance office at Fort Jackson on 20 January 1997, which indicated that the evacuation allowances would cease effective 5 December 1996 and that his dependents needed to submit a final voucher. Accordingly, it was reasonable for him to presume that the allowances being provided directly to his dependents would cease once he provided documentation to show that they were no longer his dependents. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012103
The applicant states he submitted an application for FSSA that was approved by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). He is prepared to pay back the funds he received during the additional months because he knew he was not entitled to this pay; however, he should not have to repay the funds he received during the first 3 months because he believed DFAS approved his application and the entitlement was his. After careful review of this case, the applicant's debt resulted from his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212
The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.