| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be prepared to cover his active duty service from 8 July 1994 to 9 April 1997.
3. The applicant states that a DD Form 214 was not prepared at the time he vacated his Warrant to accept a commission as a second lieutenant.
4. The applicant’s military records show that the applicant enlisted in the Army on 26 April 1994 for 3 years, for training as a Helicopter Pilot.
5. On 7 July 1994, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of accepting appointment as a warrant officer.
6. On 8 July 1994, he was ordered to active duty as a Warrant Officer One.
7. On 9 April 1997, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of accepting a commission. He was not issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service as a warrant officer (8 July 1994 to 9 April 1997).
8. On 10 April 1997, he was ordered to active as a second lieutenant.
9. 15 September 2001, he was separated from active duty and transferred to the Reserve control Group (Reinforcement). His DD Form 214 issued for this period of service did not list his warrant officer service.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant served on active duty from 8 July 1994 to 9 April 1997 as a warrant officer and his records should be corrected accordingly.
2. His DD Form 214 issued on 15 September 2001 should be corrected to include his warrant officer service.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that item 12a (Date entered AD This Period), DD Form 214, dated 15 September 2001, of the individual concerned, is 19940708 and that item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) is 00070208.
BOARD VOTE:
_sk_____ _sep____ __eja___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Shirley L. Powell
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001063608 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020319 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065380C070402
On 3 March 2001, the applicant completed and his commander signed an Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness, DA Form 3508-R. At that time he owed two debts totaling $4,496.80 due to overpayment of his pay and allowances when his PEBD was calculated incorrectly, $1,198.88 of which had been collected. The Board believes that had the PERSCOM acted upon the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of this indebtedness prior to any collections being made by DFAS,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087002C070212
In support of his application, he submits a Memorandum for Record, dated 11 July 2000; and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 April 2000. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 April 2000 does not show that he served in Kosovo. Therefore, as an exception to policy, the Board determined that item 18 (Remarks) on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 April 2000 should be corrected to show that he served in Kosovo from 1 July 1999 to 31 August 1999.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079940C070215
The Board noted that the period of the disqualification for award of the Good Conduct Medal is different from the dates the applicant served on active duty. The Board noted that the memorandum does not state the reason for disqualification for award of the Good Conduct Medal. The Board also noted that the memorandum is dated after the applicant was released from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091194C070212
The applicant's military personnel records were not available to the Board. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion points out that the applicant requested retirement point credit service performed between the effective date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve, 9 October 1996, and the date when his official orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve were actually published, 29 August 1997. At this time, the applicant was given the option of accepting separation pay or changing the effective...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059190C070421
The applicant states that, although the error has been corrected, the faulty permanent order is still in his record. The applicant was erroneously awarded another second award for the period 2 June 1991 to 1 June 1994 on 2 June 1994 by Permanent Orders 29-10, 257 th Personnel Service Company. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by expunging Permanent Orders 29-10, 257 th Personnel Service Company, dated 2 June 1994 from the OMPF of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001489C070205
The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve under the DEP on 16 May 1981 and was discharged on 8 September 1981, which is a period of 3 months and 23 days. Although there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of active duty service from 9 September 1981 to 30 June 1983, he should have been issued one. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059269C070421
The applicant states that he has been informed that others have been discharged before and since his discharge with RE Code 3. The applicant also submitted a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States) requesting the RE code upgrade. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant should have been issued RE Code 3 and his records should be corrected accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082407C070215
He goes on to state that he was informed by officials at the Total Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) that his status had not been properly recorded and he desires to be placed in the Retired Reserve effective 15 April 1997, with entitlement to all benefits that he would accrue from that date. On 15 April 1997, he was honorably discharged from the California Army National Guard and his report of separation (NGB Form 22) shows that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061818C070421
The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not reflect entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal based on his honorable service during the period 7 November 1989 through 6 November 1992.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083693C070212
In his advisory opinion, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, stated that the Board has the authority to grant a waiver or exception to policy for the date the degree was conferred, and since the applicant completed all requirements prior to the board, he recommended that the applicant be granted a waiver for the educational requirement. Paragraph 2-9, of the above regulations states, "Effective 1 October 1995, no person may be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of CPT unless, not...