Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061818C070421
Original file (2001061818C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 23 OCTOBER 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061818


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Shirley L. Powell Chairperson
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. He states he was not awarded the decoration and believes he was overlooked because of his numerous reassignments. In support of his request he submits several performance evaluation reports, a copy of an Army Commendation Medal recommendation, and a statement from one of his unit commanders.

3. Records indicate he entered active duty on 7 November 1989. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The applicant completed his first period of eligibility for award of the Good Conduct Medal on 6 November 1992.

4. Between November 1989 and November 1992 the applicant completed training, successfully completed one tour of duty in Korea, was promoted to pay grade E-5, and was awarded an Army Commendation Medal and the Air Assault Badge.

5. The July 1991 memorandum, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, was from his unit commander while in Korea. It supported the applicant’s desire to apply for OCS (Officer Candidate School) and noted that he was “one of the finest soldiers in my unit.” His Army Commendation Medal, awarded for meritorious service during the period 12 August 1991 through
30 September 1992, noted that the applicant provided excellent supply support during numerous exercises, lead his section during tactical amphibious training, and accomplished all of his missions while assigned to the 3rd Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

6. According to item 35 (record of assignment) on the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (personnel qualification record) he was assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia in October 1992 for the purpose of attending OCS. However, he returned to duties as a supply sergeant at Fort Campbell in November 1992 where he continued to serve admirably until his reassignment in March 1994. The applicant’s second Army Commendation Medal, awarded for the period 10 August 1991 through
1 March 1994, recognized the applicant’s meritorious service as a company level supply sergeant in a variety of units at Fort Campbell.

7. The performance evaluation report, submitted by the applicant in support of his request confirm that the applicant was a consistently outstanding soldier who was well thought of by members of his chain of command.

8. On 9 August 1995 the applicant was released from active duty, with an honorable characterization of service, for the purpose of attending school. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not reflect entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal.

9. While Army Regulation 600-8-22 states there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. There is no evidence the applicant was ever awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal. However, the Board notes that he completed a qualifying period of service for the award on 6 November 1992. There is no evidence that the applicant was ever disqualified for the award and no evidence which would serve as a basis to deny him the award. The Board concludes that it would be appropriate, and in the interest of justice, to award the applicant an Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 November 1989 through 6 November 1992.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal based on his honorable service during the period 7 November 1989 through 6 November 1992.

BOARD VOTE:

__SLP __ __ALR __ __TEO__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION


                  ____Shirley L. Powell _
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061818
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011023
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060648C070421

    Original file (2001060648C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to reflect award of an Army Good Conduct Medal and an Army Commendation Medal. During his first tour of duty in Korea he was awarded three awards of the Army Achievement Medal, all of which are recorded on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). There is, however, no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that he was ever recommended for, or awarded an Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018222C070206

    Original file (20050018222C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Combat Infantryman Badge be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. He is therefore entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 January 1989 through 23 January 1992 and to have this award added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000717

    Original file (20100000717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 January 1992 to show: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Korea Defense Service Medal * Master Parachutist Badge * Marksmanship Sniper Course * Drop Zone Support Team Leader Course * Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) Course 2. There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Master Parachutist Badge. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021367

    Original file (20130021367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded or authorized the AAM (2nd Award), SWASM with 3 bronze service stars, KLM-SA, and KLM-KU. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he is authorized this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 13 of his DD Form 214 to add the following awards: * AAM-2 * SWASM with three bronze service stars *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015033

    Original file (20100015033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show: * Assignment to B Company, 6th Battalion, 502nd Infantry, Berlin Brigade, from 2 March 1991 to 31 August 1991 * Deployment to Silopi, Turkey, in support of Operation Provide Comfort from July 1991 to August 1991 * All awards and decorations associated with his deployment. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show his assignment to the 6th Battalion nor does it show any activities after his arrival in Berlin in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016584

    Original file (20130016584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of the Infantry School and Air Assault School * award of the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal * his service during Operation Desert Storm and all corresponding medals 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years, 8 months, and 7 days of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021238

    Original file (20120021238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with arrowhead device and a bronze service star to denote participation credit in the Panama Campaign. c. Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007337C070208

    Original file (20040007337C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was retired from active duty in 1992 by reason of physical disability. A second medical document provided by the applicant indicates that on 28 April 1992 he reported to medical personnel that his physician had told him to come in when he was ready for surgery. The final medical document, provided by the applicant, indicates that on 3 September 1992 he was seen by a medical doctor who noted the applicant was being seen as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005159

    Original file (20130005159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The command imposed nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on the applicant under Article 15 of the UCMJ. That form would have been available for use at the time the applicant was purportedly punished under Article 15. There is no evidence of record and neither the applicant nor counsel have provided sufficient evidence to show the DA Form 2627 contained in his record is untrue or unjust or that the applicant was improperly imposed punishment under Article 15.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011798

    Original file (20100011798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) that he served in Korea from 22 January 1991 through 21 January 1992; b. item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) that he was awarded or authorized the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, Parachutist Badge, Army Service Ribbon, Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award), Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award),...