Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010940
Original file (20100010940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010940 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the time of retirement or that she submitted a deemed election request in a timely manner.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the FSM failed to comply with the court order to elect former spouse SBP coverage and instead elected child only SBP coverage.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the following:

* FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* A supporting statement
* Divorce decree
* Letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Retired and Annuity Pay with Form W-4P (Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Pay) and Direct Deposit Form

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM’s records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 June 1985 and he continuously served in an active duty status through a series of extensions and/or reenlistments.


2.  The FSM’s records also show the applicant and the FSM were married on 
6 May 1989.

3.  The applicant’s Judgment of Absolute Divorce, dated 11 December 2002, shows on page 16 that the FSM agreed to opt for former spouse SBP coverage at such time as he was required to make an election and name his wife as his former spouse and annuitant.  The FSM was also ordered to pay the applicant child support and 30 percent of his military retirement pay upon retirement.  The divorce decree also ordered that the SBP premiums would be paid out of the FSM's military retirement pay.

4.  The FSM’s DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired on 31 March 2006 due to sufficient service for retirement and was transferred to the USAR control group (Retired) as a master sergeant, effective 1 April 2006 after completing 20 years, 9 months, and 13 days of active military service.  

5.  On 10 November 2009, the DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay Branch, explained to the applicant that the FSM's record shows the FSM's SBP election was currently Child only coverage and T-----r C-----r was listed as the annuitant.  

6.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP child coverage only at the time of his retirement on 31 March 2006.  The applicant and the FSM married on
6 May 1989 and divorced on 11 December 2002.  The final divorce decree indicates the FSM agreed to provide SBP coverage for the applicant as his former spouse.  

2.  However, at the time of his retirement the FSM elected SBP coverage only for his children.  There is no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS within 1 year of the divorce and requested a deemed election of former spouse coverage and the evidence shows the FSM willfully failed to comply with the court's order.    
3.  Based upon the SBP award in the final divorce decree and the fact it appears the FSM  has not remarried, the FSM's SBP election should be changed to add his former spouse based on her timely submission of a deemed election request to DFAS and the FSM should be required to pay SBP premiums from the effective date specified in the divorce decree, 1 April 2006. 

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department 
of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show:

a. that the applicant submitted a timely request for a deemed election of former
spouse SBP coverage which was processed by DFAS in conjunction with the FSM's 1 April 2006 retirement and resulted in former spouse and children coverage; and

   b.  that the FSM be advised that DFAS will be instructed to collect any additional SBP premium costs that may be due as a result of this action, effective from 1 April 2006, the date of the FSM’s retirement from active duty.




      _______ _   X____   ___
      	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010940



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008327C070205

    Original file (20060008327C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also states, in effect, at the time of their divorce the court ordered the FSM to provide SBP coverage and designate the applicant as the beneficiary. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant made a written request of deemed election to DFAS for former spouse SBP coverage based on the divorce decree. However, the evidence of record fails to show that either the FSM or the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM’s SBP election from spouse to former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014711C071108

    Original file (20060014711C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely elected to change his category of participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage. The applicant provides documentation that shows, in pertinent part, she was married to the FSM for most of his military career, the marriage lasted for nearly 42 years, and she was to be designated as the beneficiary of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011742

    Original file (20130011742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), as follows: * by showing he timely elected to change his election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage on 19 November 1994 * by showing the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) timely processed this change in election * by paying her an SBP annuity as the former spouse retroactive to the date of the FSM's death on 6 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016751

    Original file (20110016751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made, if the request is made within one year of the date of a court order of divorce. The evidence of record indicates that the FSM failed to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse at the time of his retirement on the DD Form 2656. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019123

    Original file (20140019123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant provides: * Report and Certificate of Marriage * Divorce decree * FSM's Certificate of Death * Applicant's name change * Child's name change * Letter of Guardianship * Physician Certificate for Child...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553

    Original file (20060013553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004182C070205

    Original file (20060004182C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his category of participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage at the time of his retirement and continued to pay SBP premiums even after they divorced. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012684

    Original file (20090012684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he participated in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage. This document shows the applicant requested that the Court equitably distribute the parties' retirement plans, including, in pertinent part, "Military Retirement, or any and all other forms of retirement and death or survivor's benefits." c. Thus, the evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020113

    Original file (20140020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his survivor benefit plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" (FS) within 1 year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant's applied to DFAS for an SBP annuity; however, on 22 February 2014, DFAS responded to her request denying an SBP annuity due to the FSM never making a valid request to change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158

    Original file (20110009158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....