IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 August 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001548
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSMs Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that the court, as part of her divorce, decreed that her former spouse was required to maintain her as beneficiary for payment of a survivor annuity upon his death. She states that to the best of her knowledge she was never informed that she needed to submit a request for the annuity.
3. The applicant notes that she is now 80 years old and believed that this annuity would be provided upon the death of her ex-spouse. She states she would not have received a copy of her former spouses pay statement to be able to track payments when due.
4. The applicant provides a copy of her marriage certificate, a copy of her divorce decree, a copy of the FSM's death certificate, and a copy of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant and the FSM were married on 24 February 1945. The FSM entered military service as a Regular Army (RA) enlisted Soldier on 28 February 1947 and served continuously until his retirement for length of service on 31 May 1967.
2. The FSMs official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Servicemans Family Protection Plan) which he executed on 5 December 1966. That form notes the FSM elected not to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependents. On his March 1967 application for voluntary retirement, the FSM also indicated that he elected not to participate in the Retired Servicemans Family Protection Plan (RSFPP).
3. Information obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS) Retired and Annuity Pay Operations indicated that on 1 October 1973, during an open-season period, the FSM executed an SBP election for spouse-only coverage.
4. On 26 June 1995 the applicant and the FSM were divorced. The Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage issued in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Missouri, stated the "Plaintiff [the applicant] shall be maintained as beneficiary for payment of a survivor annuity to Plaintiff upon Defendants [FSM] death pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448
."
5. According to information maintained at DFAS, on 26 June 1995, the same date the FSMs divorce was finalized, SBP coverage was suspended. DFAS also noted that premiums were no longer being paid and there was no deemed election for former spouse coverage on file.
6. On 20 November 2008 the FSM died. His death certificate lists the applicant as his spouse. However, in subsequent correspondence to the Board the applicant noted that was an error although neither she nor her former spouse ever remarried.
7. Public Law 83-239 enacted on 8 August 1953 established the Uniformed Services Contingency Option Act (USCOA). Public Law 87-381 enacted on 4 October 1961 changed the USCOA to the RSFPP. The USCOA automatically converted to the RSFPP with the same election options and annuity amounts as the USCOA.
8. Public Law 92-425 enacted on 21 September 1972 repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP. The RSFPP was not automatically converted to the SBP. A 12-month open season enrollment period was established for retired members. Public Law 93-155 enacted on 16 November 1973 extended that open season from 12 to 18 months (21 September 1972-20 March 1974). Premium deductions continued after the loss of a spouse until enactment of Public
Law 94-496 effective 1 October 1976 which suspended spouse costs if the marriage ends in death or divorce.
9. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.
10. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce. The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.
11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence available to the Board indicates the FSMs retired pay was reduced on a monthly basis commencing in October 1973 when he initially elected to provide for spouse-only coverage under the SBP. Upon his divorce in 1995 the SBP was suspended in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 94-496 and premiums were no longer being paid.
2. The divorce decree awarded the SBP to the applicant and specifically ordered the FSM to maintain the applicants designation as a former spouse SBP beneficiary. Unfortunately, it appears the FSM did not take the action directed by the court, nor did the applicant make a request for a deemed election of the SBP. As a result of the failure, premiums associated with the SBP were not paid between the 1995 date of divorce and 2008 when the FSM died.
3. However, where the court has ordered former spouse coverage and there is no current spouse, as a matter of equity that it would be appropriate to correct the records in such a way as to provide for the SBP annuity to the former spouse.
4. As such, it would be equitable to correct the records to show the applicant timely requested a deemed election as a former spouse. However, since the premiums have not been paid, it would be appropriate to have those premiums paid out of the annuity or otherwise before payment is made to the applicant.
5. The applicant should be granted the SBP benefit and DFAS should provide the applicant with the pertinent information relating to the outstanding premiums and any related benefits.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing that the applicant made a request for a deemed election for the SPB as a former spouse within the required allotted time and that DFAS timely received and processed the request for a deemed election; and
b. showing that after appropriate arrangements have been made to pay the required premiums, paying the applicant the full SBP benefit from the date of the FSM's death.
__________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090001548
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090001548
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008249
The applicant, the ex-spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM's records be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be paid the SBP benefit payments. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009468
The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be entitled to his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity payment from the date of his death on 25 July 1976. Public Law 990-485, enacted 13 August 1968, provided that an RSFPP election had to be made before the member completed 19 years of service. At this time, the lawful beneficiary of the FSM's SBP is considered to be E____, his spouse at the time of his death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028925
The applicant states the FSM did not keep up with his retired service member benefits. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018686 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028925 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022211
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Even though the FSM continued to pay the SBP premiums neither the applicant nor the FSM made a deemed election for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005547
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005547 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she married the FSM after he retired from the service. There is no indication the FSM elected to participate in the USCOA, the RSFPP, or the SBP, either at the time of or immediately following his retirement or during any of the later open enrollment seasons.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013477
The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 12 August 2004. After their divorce in August 2004, the FSM continued to pay SBP spouse coverage premiums until his death even though he was not required to do so. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, his former spouse, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he changed his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within a timely manner and that she be paid the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961
Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 1997009264
On 10 September 1991, the FSM and the applicant divorced. However, the Board concludes that it was the FSM’s intent to provide SBP “former spouse” coverage for the applicant as he continued to pay SBP costs until his death. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM concerned changed his SBP “spouse” coverage to “former spouse” coverage on 10 September 1991, the date of his divorce, thereby entitling the applicant to an SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007567
On 14 May 1996, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement (or during an open-season election prior to his/her divorce), or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...