Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061594C070421
Original file (2001061594C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 14 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061594


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. John E. Denning Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to show his date of birth as 27 November 1960.

3. The applicant states that he was born in Havana, Cuba on 27 November 1960. He came to the United States on 26 June 1995. When he received his Permanent Resident Card, he did not notice until some time later that the date of birth on the card read 27 November 1969. Instead of correcting the mistake on the card, he adopted that date as his birth date. All his military records, and many of his civilian records, reflect this incorrect birth date. He has since taken steps to correct the mistake on his Alien Registration Card. The wrong birth date was not done for any fraudulent purpose or with intent to commit fraud.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program on 22 March 1996 and in the Regular Army on 14 May 1996 for 3 years. His Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, DD Form 4/1, shows his date of birth as 27 November 1969. He was released from active duty on 13 May 1999 and apparently transferred to an Army National Guard unit. Item 5 of the DD Form 214 shows his date of birth as 27 November 1969.

5. The applicant apparently recently received a new Permanent Resident Card. It shows his date of birth as 27 November 1960. On 5 February 2002, the Immigration and Naturalization Service verified that his date of birth is 27 November 1960.

6. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. Normally, the Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2. While the applicant served on and was released from active duty under the Army’s impression that his date of birth was 27 November 1969, the Immigration and Naturalization Service has verified that his date of birth is actually 27 November 1960. It would be appropriate to correct all his records to show his date of birth as 27 November 1960.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case, to include the applicant’s DD Form 214, be corrected to show his date of birth as 27 November 1960.

BOARD VOTE:

__jns___ __bje___ __jed___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           John N. Slone
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061594
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020214
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020775

    Original file (20120020775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Certificate of Birth and Baptism * his Social Security card * United States of America Permanent Resident card CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 28 May 1970, contained in the applicant's military service records shows in item 22 (Citizenship) the entry "CANADA."

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01

    Original file (00870-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018902

    Original file (20100018902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States), section III (Other Personnel Date): a. item 22a (Education), sub-item (3) (Name of School), from "Norview High School" to "Abdu al rahman al khafiqie High School." In support of his application, he provided: a. DD Form 1966, item 22a(3), which lists the name of the high school he attended as "Norview High School." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069652C070402

    Original file (2002069652C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show any of his Vietnam service medals. The evidence of record shows the applicant met the award criteria for award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960, and the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055843C070420

    Original file (2001055843C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, who is the sister of the former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM’s home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect that his permanent address was Honolulu, Hawaii (at the street address shown on the application) at the time of his death. Inasmuch as it appears there are no benefits that will accrue to the FSM as a result of correcting his HOR, other than the extension of future memorialization activities to a former Hawaiian soldier, the Board is of the opinion that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021847

    Original file (20100021847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his legal name. The applicant contends that his name on his DD Form 214 and military records should be changed to "Al---ro Edi--n. Sir---a Pr---to."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011537

    Original file (20130011537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) and all documents throughout his military record containing a DOB show his DOB as 20 November 1944. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086601C070212

    Original file (2003086601C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Block 3 (Social Security Number) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the number *** / 44 / 160. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions that the date of birth, Social Security Account Number and the rank entered on the DD Form 214 issued him on his release from active duty for training are incorrect; however, it finds that only the date of birth and Social Security Account Number are in error. The date of birth recorded in Block 9 of the DD Form 214 is incorrect and should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055088C070420

    Original file (2001055088C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, since there is no record of how many missions the applicant flew on those days, the Board must default to one mission per day. Using the number of days the applicant flew (256) divided by the standard of 25 combat missions, the Board concludes that the applicant should be awarded 10 Air Medals. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Air Medal for Valor with Numeral 10, to denote the award of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059560C070421

    Original file (2001059560C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to give a separation code (SPD) that will allow him to retain his separation pay. Upon returning to the States, he was informed that his SPD was wrong and that was the reason his separation pay was being collected as a debt. It appears that the applicant was entitled to full separation pay but because he was given the incorrect SPD DFAS is collecting that pay as a debt.