Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018902
Original file (20100018902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	 8 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018902


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States), section III (Other Personnel Date):

   a.  item 22a (Education), sub-item (3) (Name of School), from "Norview High School" to "Abdu al rahman al khafiqie High School."

   b.  section III (Other Personnel Date), item 22a (Education), sub-item (4) (Location), from "6501 Chesapeake Blvd, Norfolk, VA" to "Al Majmooa'a Al Thakhfia, Mosul City, Iraq."

2.  Correction of Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Standard Form 
(SF) 86 (Security Clearance Application – PAI/PEI Report):

   a.  item 6 (Mother's Maiden Name) from "H___, Kh____ A." to "B____, Kh____ M."

   b.  item 9 (Citizenship), sub-item 9d (Immigration Status – Alien Registration Number) from "a098______" to "A087______," as shown on his Permanent Residence Card.

   c.  item 9 (Citizenship), sub-item 9d (Immigration Status – City/State) from "New York, Iraq" to "New York, NY."


3.  The applicant states, in effect, that he gave his recruiter a diploma and filled out the application for his high school in Iraq.  

4.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DD Form 1966 (6 pages)
* OPM SF 86
* Photocopies of his Permanent Resident Card, Passport, United States (U.S.) Visa, and Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Form I-94 (Departure Record)
* Photocopy of a foreign document printed in the Arabic language purported to be his high school diploma

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 October 2009 and he did not complete training.  On 25 November 2009, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-17 with an uncharacterized discharge.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 cites "Condition, Not a Disability."

2.  There is no documentation in the available record nor did he provide any documentation to substantiate:

   a.  the name, or address of the high school he attended,

   b.  his mother's maiden name,

   c.  the port in which he entered the U.S.  

3.  In support of his application, he provided:

   a. DD Form 1966, item 22a(3), which lists the name of the high school he attended as "Norview High School."  Additionally, item 22a(4) lists the location of his high school as "6501 Chesapeake Blvd, Norfolk, VA."

   b. OPM Form 86, item 6, lists his mother's maiden name as "H___, Kh____ A."  Additionally, item 9d lists his Alien Registration Number as "a098______," and his City/State of Entry as "New York, Iraq."

   
c.  Photocopies of his Permanent Resident Card, Passport, U.S. Visa, and INS Form I-94.  His Permanent Resident Card, otherwise known as his alien card, lists his alien registration number as "A087______."  His INS Form I-94 is date stamped 13 December 2006; however, the corresponding U.S. port of entry is illegible.  

   d.  A photocopy of a foreign document printed in the Arabic language, purported to be his high school diploma.  When translated this document resembles a cover letter from a school superintendent stating that his high school examination results are enclosed; however, there were no enclosures submitted with this document.  The document does not identify the high school he attended.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 1966 and OPM SF 86 has been carefully considered and determined to have partial merit.  

2.  The available evidence does not list the name of the high school he attended nor does it establish a direct link between him any specific high school.  Absent such evidence, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case.  

3.  The applicant did not provide any evidence and the available evidence is not sufficient to support changing his mother's maiden name; therefore, absent such evidence, he has established no basis to grant relief in this case.  

4.  With regard to his alien registration number, the evidence he provided, specifically, his Permanent Resident Card, clearly shows his alien registration number is incorrectly depicted on his OPM SF 86.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this form to show his correct alien registration number.  

5.  With regard to his U.S. port of entry, neither the evidence of record, nor the evidence he provided, lists his U.S. port of entry.  Nevertheless, from an administrative standpoint, it is clear that the state of New York should be listed as the corresponding state to the city of New York, instead of Iraq, which is currently the case.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this form to show the correct state for the city listed as his port of entry.  


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  issuing a clarifying letter to correspond with his OPM SF 86, identifying his correct alien registration number as A087______, as shown on his Permanent Residence Card.
   
   b.  issuing a clarifying letter to correspond with his OPM SF 86, identifying his correct U.S. port of entry as New York, NY.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to:

   a.  correcting his DD Form 1966 pertaining to the name and location of his high school.

   b.  correcting his OPM SF 86 pertaining to his mother's maiden name.



      ___________x______________
       	       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014579



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018902



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00873

    Original file (ND00-00873.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00873 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 070600, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. For example, when completing the Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016383

    Original file (20080016383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his HOR on his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his Young-Dong-Po-Gu address in Seoul, Korea. By law and Army regulations, non-U.S. citizens, in order to enlist, must have lawfully entered the United States as a permanent resident alien and must have a bona fide HOR in the United States when enlisting.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01

    Original file (00870-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00694

    Original file (ND02-00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00694 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason and separation code for the discharge be changed. Change separation code Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant concerning issues dated April 4, 2003 with attached Exhibits A-H, J-N (34...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020775

    Original file (20120020775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Certificate of Birth and Baptism * his Social Security card * United States of America Permanent Resident card CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 28 May 1970, contained in the applicant's military service records shows in item 22 (Citizenship) the entry "CANADA."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016517

    Original file (20130016517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 April 2013 and DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) to show her home of record (HOR) as Texas. The applicant states her mailing address was entered as the HOR on both her enlistment contract and her DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows in item 7b (HOR at Time of Entry) the same address shown as the HOR on her DD Form 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021847

    Original file (20100021847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his legal name. The applicant contends that his name on his DD Form 214 and military records should be changed to "Al---ro Edi--n. Sir---a Pr---to."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005995

    Original file (20080005995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He now requests his military records corrected. Counsel requests correction of the applicant’s military records to show his correct name, date of birth, and place of birth. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, dated 24 November 1969, be corrected to show his correct name as “Roxxxxo Rxxxxa-Vxxa,” his DOB as “29 July 1947,” and place of birth as “Arecibo, Puerto Rico.” 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013641

    Original file (20120013641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in the available records that shows (or fails to show) that during his military service he submitted any personnel actions to change his citizenship status on his military records. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show an "X" was placed in the "No" block in item 7 of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061594C070421

    Original file (2001061594C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. John E. DenningMember The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board. It would be appropriate to correct all his records to show his date of birth as 27 November 1960.