| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Anderson | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
12. On 12 August 2001, the applicant amended his application, by letter, to request that his records be corrected to show his effective date of promotion to captain also be corrected. He states that his date of rank (DOR) was corrected but the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will not pay him back pay and allowances because the Board’s directive did not correct the effective date of his promotion.
13. Conversation with the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components indicated that a correction was made to the Recommendation in the original Proceedings to show the applicant was promoted to captain with a date of rank of 8 August 1995 (vice 8 August 1996). That office also indicated that the 1995 Reserve Components Selection Board for captain, Army Medical Department adjourned on 9 February 1995.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
3. At the time of the Board’s 22 March 2001 decision in this case (docket number 2000049104), it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time of the Board’s action.
4. Army Regulation 135-155 specifies that an officer is promoted after selection if all qualifications for promotion are met. The applicant was selected under the 1995 criteria. The 1995 promotion board adjourned on 9 February 1995. Since this was prior to the applicant’s promotion eligibility date of 8 August 1995, he would have been eligible for promotion (DOR and effective date) on 8 August 1995.
5. In view of the additional factors in this case the applicant is entitled to correction of his record to show he was promoted to captain with a DOR and effective date of 8 August 1995.
6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated
22 March 2001, to show that the applicant was promoted to captain with a date of rank and effective date of 8 August 1995.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhl___ __mkp___ __ena___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Joann H. Langston
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061451 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060045C070421
He also states that the applicant was in the zone of consideration by the 1996 RCSB with a PED of 10 September 1996 (sic), based on the 12 years TCS requirement. The table states an officer will be promoted on the date he meets the TIG in grade and TCS requirements provided he is recommended for promotion by the selection board that considered him for promotion. If not selected for promotion by the SSB he should be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 10 September 1996 (sic)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074340C070403
The applicant submitted the following in support of his application: Orders Number 33-055, US Total Army Personnel Command, dated 3 March 1989; Memorandum, Subject: Release from Active Duty, dated 9 July 1996; Orders 226-0002, United States Military Academy, dated 13 August 1996; Memorandum, Subject: Request for Recall to Active Duty with 2 endorsements; Memorandum, Subject: Extension Beyond Mandatory Release Date (MRD); Unclassified Message, Subject: Recall to Active Duty, date and time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075956C070403
The effective date of promotion and DOR shall be the same as if the officer had been selected to the grade concerned by the promotion board for RASL officers. The effective date of promotion and DOR shall be the same as if the officer had been selected to the grade concerned by the promotion board for RASL officers. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for promotion to CPT by an active duty Promotion Board and placed on the active duty Promotion Standing List...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051136C070420
The applicant was considered by the next available Reserve CW3 Promotion Board, the FY94 promotion board, but was not selected for promotion. The effective date for the applicant’s promotion to CW3 from the FY95 board His present promotion memorandum to CW4, dated 1 August 2000, should be corrected to be dated 19 May 2000, the adjournment date of the promotion board and therefore the effective date for promotion to CW4 and the date from which CW4 pay and allowances should be paid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058285C070421
On 7 August 1996, the ABCMR recommended that the applicant’s discharge be revoked and that he be promoted as though he had been selected by the original promotion board (case AC96-07492). The board consider the applicant for promotion. He should be first considered for promotion to LTC by the CY2004 promotion board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083948C070212
The applicant was promoted to major with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 3 January 2000. ROPMA was implemented on 1 October 1996, and it established that the MTIG for a captain is 7 years, and that an officer selected for promotion to major the first time he/she is considered will be promoted on or before the date that he/she completes the MTIG. The respective promotion board and the processing of the promotion board results were administratively delayed through no fault of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090367C070212
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting the applicant's effective date and DOR for promotion to the rank of major to 28 February 1998 and that his records be placed before a Special Selection Board for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel, if eligible.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081735C070215
The applicant states that he was promoted to captain effective 1 March 2002; however; his eligibility date for promotion to captain was 24 March 2001, which should have been adjusted one year according to ROPMA. The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a 2LT and 4 years as a 1LT before promotion to captain. The Board notes the advisory opinion provided by PERSCOM that stated promotion to 1LT required 3 years TIG, with a PED of 25 March...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053824C070420
The evidence of record confirms that the applicant had 2 years, 4 months, and 19 days of prior extended active duty commissioned officer service at the time she was appointed in the AMSC but only received ¼ credit of 7 months and 5 days at that time. In the opinion of the Board, it is clear the applicant should have received ½ credit for her prior active duty commissioned service. The Board concurs with the findings and recommendations provided in the PERSCOM advisory opinion and it...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and 23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates; 2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955, 47...