| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Allen L. Raub | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his honorable discharge as a result of his unqualified resignation be changed to a medical separation as a result of a service-connected disability.
APPLICANT STATES: That he suffered a head injury during mandatory boxing class on 1 September 1998. His injury was causing severe headaches and dizziness and he was given a variety of medications to treat these symptoms. Because of upperclass pressure and lack of support from his chain of command he was made to feel like he was shirking his duties. Eventually, he became so debilitated that he was unable to function as a plebe and was sent to counseling. Subsequently, he sought resignation from the U. S. Military Academy (USMA) as his only option without realizing the extent or severity of his injury. Had he received a complete and full medical evaluation rather than just counseling prior to his separation, the extent and severity of his injury would have qualified him for a medical separation for a service connected disability. The VA has since granted him a 50 percent disability rating for cognitive disorder with depression post concussional disorder.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered the Army as a USMA Cadet on 29 June 1998. Available service medical records and the VA rating decision show the applicant has presented an accurate portrayal of the events surrounding his head injury and treatment.
In a letter from the applicant’s father to their Representative in Congress, his father indicated that a doctor at the USMA told the applicant he should go to Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) for observation and evaluation. Although his parents encouraged him to go to WRAMC, the applicant decided not to because his chain of command told him that if he went he was finished at West Point.
On an unknown date, the applicant requested unqualified resignation. His request was approved and he was discharged effective 22 October 1998.
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The regulation defines “physically unfit” as unfitness due to physical disability. The unfitness is of such a degree that a soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty. Paragraph 1-4 states that Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1217 excludes cadets of service academies from eligibility for disability benefits under Title 10, chapter 61. However, USMA cadets may be entitled to compensation administered by the VA. Title 38, U. S. Code, section 101(21)(D) includes service as a cadet at the USMA within the definition of active duty for purposes of entitlement to VA compensation.
Title 10, U. S. Code, chapter 61 (Retirement or Separation for Disability), section 1217 (cadets, midshipmen, and aviation cadets: chapter does not apply to) states “This chapter does not apply to cadets at the United States Military Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, or the Coast Guard Academy or to midshipmen of the Navy.”
The VA awarded the applicant a 50 percent disability rating for cognitive disorder with depression post concussional disorder effective 10 April 2000, the date he filed his original disability claim.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s injury during mandatory boxing while at the U. S. Military Academy was unfortunate. However, by law he, as a USMA cadet, was ineligible for disability processing. As he is aware, he is eligible for VA benefits.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__slp___ __alr___ __teo___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061120 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011023 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025845
The applicant states: * In April 2004 he was deemed unfit for duty by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) * It was determined his injury was the direct result of an injury he sustained at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA), West Point * The PEB ruled that since his original injury occurred at West Point his disability was the result of an injury that existed prior to service (EPTS) * He was discharged from the Army in August 2004 * It has come to his attention that since his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006260
The applicant provided a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows she separated on 1 February 1990 with a characterization of service as under honorable conditions (general discharge) and the reason for her separation was Dropped from the Rolls (DFR). The applicant contends that her discharge should be changed to a medical discharge as the medical doctors at USMA found her medically unfit for continued service. Cadets of USMA are not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009187
The PEB noted that her disability rating was less than 30% and informed her that for Soldiers with such a rating and with less than 20 years of active Federal service, Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) required separation from service with severance pay. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008975
The Superintendent may, however, grant medical waivers for continuation at USMA, provided the cadet meets the retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. b. Paragraph 6-30 (Medically disqualified cadets) states that whenever the Surgeon, USMA, determines a USMA cadet does not meet the fitness requirements to perform all duties as a member of the Corps of Cadets during the current academic term or summer training period, or will not meet the medical fitness standards for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003432
Counsel provides the following: USMA Oath of Allegiance; Academic Record; Cadet Performance Reports; Leadership Performance Reports; Demerit Review; USMA Forms 2-3 (Record of Formal Proceedings Under Article 10, Cadet Disciplinary Code); Sworn Statement; Memorandum, Subject: Disciplinary Award No. On 2 March 2007, the applicant's counselor recommended dismissal of the preferred charges on the applicant because the test result "was barely positive." Army Regulation 210-26 also states, in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02253
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02253 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block #28 of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from Disability, Existed Prior to Service to Disability, Incurred during...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9310741
: The applicant's military personnel and medical records show:While a cadet at West Point Military Academy, the applicant was conservatively treated for complaints of increasing low back pain. The applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant and entered on active duty on 25 May 1988. He also cited examples of his level of physical fitness before and after his surgery while he was a cadet at West Point Military Academy, and how he injured his back when he was the officer in charge of a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000912
The applicant provides copies of his USMA separation and recoupment of education costs documents, ROTC enlistment and appointment documents, and active duty orders. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant: * was disenrolled from the USMA in November 2008 * enrolled in ROTC a year later (i.e., November 2009) * was commissioned in the VAARNG three years later (i.e., May 2012) * was ordered to FTNGD-OS duty in October 2012 b. c. The applicant's Reserve active duty service, beginning...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019029
The BTO indicated that if the applicant failed any portions of his Army minimums during his retest, he would recommend separation proceedings be initiated against him under the provisions of paragraph 10.24 Regulation, USMA and he could be required to reimburse the U.S. Government for the cost of his education. He was separated for failing 3 APFTs. The advisory opinion stated the applicant was well aware that failure to meet fitness standards for both the Army and USMA could lead to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000257
The applicant and the Hearing Advisor discussed exactly what would happen during the Preliminary Hearing, including procedural matters, evidence, and types of evidence submitted. On 10 July 2006, the USMA Superintendent approved the findings of the HIH that the applicant violated the Cadet Honor Code by cheating on or about 13 April 2006 and forwarded the records of proceedings to the Department of the Army recommending the applicant separation from the USMA, transfer to the U.S. Army...