RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02728
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable
conditions) discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires his discharge upgraded. The one incident that was the basis for
his discharge was his refusal to apologize for striking a man in the mess
hall.
He states that he married in 1942, has five children, seven grandchildren,
and five great grandchildren. His children have lead productive lives and
he was elected deacon of his church where he has been a member since 1955.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973
at the National Personnel Record Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, Missouri;
therefore, limited records are available.
The applicant enlisted in the Army Air Corps on 12 January 1943.
An extract from a Hospital Disposition Board which met on 27 December 1943
indicates that the applicant possessed habits and traits of character
rendering his retention in the service undesirable and recommended his case
be referred to a Board of Officers. He was diagnosed with Constitutional
Psychopathic State-Inadequate Personality. Extracts from his clinical
record indicate he had been eliminated from the Army Specialized Training
Program (ASTP) for arguing with his captain and had been punished many
times because of insubordination and due to a quick temper, was involved in
frequent fights. The applicant appeared before the Board on 14 January
1944 and after reviewing the evidence, they recommended an undesirable
discharge on the basis that he possessed traits and habits which rendered
his retention in the service undesirable.
The applicant was discharged on 26 January 1944 in the grade of private
with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of AR 615-360 (Inaptness
or undesirable habits or traits of character). He served 1 year and 14
days total active service.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, indicated that they were unable to identify with
an arrest record on the basis of information furnished - Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant did not
submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred
in the discharge processing. He provided no other facts warranting an
upgrade of the discharge. He has not filed a timely request.
The evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 26 September 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
On 7 October 2003, the Board staff requested the applicant provide post-
service documentation within 14 days (Exhibit F). The applicant provided a
response, with attachment, which is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting the applicant’s discharge be
upgraded. The Board finds that no evidence has been presented which would
lead us to believe the applicant’s discharge was improper or contrary to
the directive under which it was effected. Nevertheless, the majority of
the Board finds that, in view of the applicant’s apparent successful
transition to civilian life, as evidenced by the post-service documentation
he has provided upgrading his discharge to general (under honorable
conditions) is appropriate. Accordingly, the majority recommends that the
applicant’s undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 26 January 1944, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 November 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Patricia Kelly, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended to grant the applicant’s request.
Mr. Russell voted to deny applicant’s request and does not wish to submit
a Minority Report. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2003-02728 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 June 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Available Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Negative FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 September 2003.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 September 2003.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 October 2003, w/atch.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-02728
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that on 26 January 1944, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02817
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended upgrading the discharge to general (under honorable conditions) due to the lack of documentation to support the reasons leading to the applicant’s discharge, if a search of the FBI file reveals no convictions. We note the recommendation from the Air Force; however, based on the limited documentation pertaining to the reason for his separation, the majority of the Board does not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02880 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant was discharged on 6 April 1978, in the grade of airman first class with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03514 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) and the narrative reason for discharge be changed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01738
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant has not provided any information or documentation regarding a wound or injury incurred as a result of enemy action. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 October 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02795
The reason for this action was that on 1 and 6 December 2001 he failed to refrain from providing alcohol for a person under age 21, and received an Article 15 with a $375 forfeiture of pay. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02986
He is very sorry for his actions while in the Air Force. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an Investigative Report, No. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 January 2004, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that he consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service activities.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02997
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB states that a review of the applicant’s records indicates he was a POW from 10 September 1944 to 8 May 1945, approximately eight months. Since the applicant was a POW for approximately eight months, he does not meet the prerequisites for a promotion. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02502
The applicant submitted a copy of his Report of Separation and a history of the 74th Bombardment Squadron. The applicant was also informed that a written recommendation would have been submitted, recommending him for the AM. Therefore, AFPC requested the applicant provide a copy of his Report of Separation and any other documents to substantiate his request for award of the AM.
Reasons for the commander’s recommendation was that the applicant made a signed statement to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) indicating his homosexual involvement with another male member. On 14 August 1959, he was discharged in the grade of airman second class, under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness - Homosexual), receiving an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02770
On 2 Jul 98, applicant requested a hardship discharge based on family difficulties. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. Additionally, we note the assigned RE code of 4A is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment consideration, provided applicant meets all other requirements for enlistment under an existing prior service program, and depending on...