Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058430C070421
Original file (2001058430C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 8 January 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058430


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Paul A. Petty Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Terry L. Placek Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid as a captain (CPT), pay grade O-3, beginning 7 June 1996, which should be his correct date of rank and promotion eligibility date for CPT, through 13 February 1999, his last date of drill before separation.

3. The applicant states that he was selected for promotion to CPT by a Reserve Components Promotion Advisory Board (standby advisory board). His memorandum of promotion showed his date of rank as 7 June 1996 and his promotion effective date as 10 October 1999, the date from which his pay and allowances would be effective. He was actively drilling in a captain’s position in a Troop Program Unit (TPU), between 7 June 1996 and 13 February 1999, and requests back pay for the difference between pay grade O-2 and O-3. In effect, it is unjust that he should not be paid as a CPT for the drills that he performed while serving in a CPT position beginning on his date of rank.

4. The applicant's military records show that he was an Army Reserve first lieutenant with a date of rank of 8 June 1992. His promotion eligibility date for promotion to captain was 7 June 1996.

5. According to a Standard Installation Division Personnel System – U. S. Army Reserve (SIDPERS-USAR) Personnel Qualification Record, prepared 25 May 1995, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 306th Military Police Battalion, Union Dale, New York, on 11 May 1995, in the S-3 position, 0015, authorized an officer in the grade of O-4, major. On 6 November 1996, he was reassigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company,
1302nd Military Police Company, in position 005, commander, a position authorized a CPT, according to the unit manning report.

6. On 13 February 1999, he was discharged from the Army Reserve due to twice non-selection for promotion.

7. On 10 August 1999, he was selected for promotion to CPT by a Reserve Components Promotion Advisory Board. The applicant was selected based on the criteria for the Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 promotion board for CPT. The FY96 promotion board had convened on 14 November 1995 and adjourned on
15 December 1995.

8. On 18 November 1999, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records directed that the applicant’s discharge be revoked and that he be promoted. On
13 February 2001, the applicant’s discharge was revoked and on 7 March 2001, he was reassigned to a TPU, Headquarters and Headquarters Company,
800th Military Police Brigade, as the Enemy Prisoner of War and Combat Intelligence Officer, a position authorized a CPT. On 4 April 2001, the U. S.


Army Reserve Personnel Command published a memorandum promoting the applicant to the rank of CPT effective 10 October 1999, with a date of rank of
7 June 1996.

9. The Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), a public law enacted by Congress on 5 October 1994, prescribes the policies and procedures to consolidate and modernize the laws that govern Reserve Component officers. The law became effective 1 October 1996. The promotion board, FY96 board for promotion to CPT, under which criteria the applicant was selected for promotion, occurred before the implementation of ROPMA.

10. According to provisions of Army Regulation 135-155, in effect at the time of the FY96 promotion selection board for CPT, TPU officers selected for promotion will be promoted on their promotion eligibility date, provided they are assigned to a position vacancy in a higher grade, if the date is after the adjournment date of the promotion board. The promotion eligibility date then becomes the new date of rank. The promotion effective date, from which the officer is eligible for pay and allowances in the higher grade, is the date the officer is assigned to a higher graded position or the promotion eligibility date if he is already assigned in a higher graded position.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was serving in a position authorized a major on 11 May 1995, the battalion S-3 position. His promotion eligibility date for promotion to CPT was 7 June 1996. He was selected for promotion to CPT based on the criteria for the FY96 promotion board which adjourned on 15 December 1995, prior to the implementation of ROPMA. According to regulations in effect at the time, he should have been promoted to CPT on his promotion eligibility date,
7 June 1996, since he was serving in a higher graded position on that date. His date of rank and his promotion effective date for CPT should be 7 June 1996 and he should be provided retroactive pay and allowances at the grade, O-3, beginning on that date.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.









RECOMMENDATION
:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected for the individual concerned by:

         a. showing that the effective date for his promotion to CPT, pay grade
O-3, is 7 June 1996, and his date of rank is 7 June 1996; and

         b. providing him pay and allowances in the pay grade O-3 beginning
7 June 1996, that he may be due.

BOARD VOTE:

_tlp____ _lls____ _rwa____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION


                           Luther L. Santiful
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058430
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020108
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128 – Pay and Allowances
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063242C070421

    Original file (2001063242C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At that time, he discovered that his active duty promotion list status should have been carried over to the USAR, but he was advised to continue with the Reserve Component (RC) promotion board process until he became a CPT and attempt to change his promotion date after he was selected for promotion. He further comments that he was considered and not selected for promotion by a RC board in 1999, because the necessary educational documentation was not in his record. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064768C070421

    Original file (2001064768C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion stated that the under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, (ROPMA), unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the approval date of the board or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the next higher grade. The evidence of record shows that she was promoted to CPT on 1 November 1996, with an eligibility date of 22 May 1996. However, based on the original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061589C070421

    Original file (2001061589C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to captain (CPT) under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) be corrected from 12 June 1998 to 22 May 1997, date of her maximum time-in- grade (MTIG) as a first lieutenant (1LT). The applicant, whose MTIG for promotion was 22 May 1997, was considered for promotion to CPT by the 1996 Reserve Components Promotion Board. The applicant, who was assigned in a TPU, was promoted to CPT by an U. S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013378

    Original file (20080013378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records show he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant/pay grade O-2 effective and with a DOR of 15 May 1995. d. NGB, Arlington, VA, memorandum, dated 7 December 2007, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, that shows the applicant was promoted in the Reserve of the Army for service in the ARNG of the United States effective and with a DOR of 7 December 2007. e. NGB, Washington, DC, Special Orders Number 307 AR, dated 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056353C070420

    Original file (2001056353C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the promotion board’s recommendations are approved after the MYSIG, the effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the date that the board’s recommendations are approved. The Chief, Promotions and Notification Branch, PERSCOM – St. Louis, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant’s promotion effective date, 30 August 2000, was correct, as that was the date he transferred from a major’s position in a TPU to the IRR and attained promotable status. Having attained his MYSIG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058994C070421

    Original file (2001058994C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 14304, Title 10, United States Code (USC), states officer will be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far enough in advance to completing the MYSIG so that if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer completes the MYSIG. The board adjourned on 2 April 1999 and recommended the applicant for promotion to MAJ. On 14 January 2000, the Chief, Office of Promotions – Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062450C070421

    Original file (2001062450C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was eligible for promotion to major on 1 April 1996, and was not considered for promotion by either active or Reserve boards due to his separation date from active duty. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he was eligible for promotion to major on 1 April 1996, and was not considered for promotion by either active or Reserve boards due to his separation from active duty. Therefore, the applicant’s correct DOR and effective date for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059600C070421

    Original file (2001059600C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was considered for promotion to LTC by the 1999 LTC Army Reserve Mandatory Promotion Board which convened on 8 September 1999. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Component, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant’s DOR and effective date for CPT, MAJ, and LTC are correct in accordance with the applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007083

    Original file (20120007083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the "1994" (i.e., 1996) nonselection letter be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be restored to 1996 * his DOR to major (MAJ) be adjusted * he be promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) * any non-mandatory education requirements such as the Command and General Staff Officers Course (CGSOC) be waived for promotion to LTC, if necessary 2. His records contain a memorandum, dated 1 March 1996, issued by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066258C070421

    Original file (2001066258C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion also stated that since the applicant met the time in grade (TIG) requirement on 25 June 1999, it is recommended that he be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 25 June 1999, and an effective date of 3 January 2000. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve...