Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064768C070421
Original file (2001064768C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 6 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064768


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Stanley Kelley Chairperson
Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that her date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT) be adjusted from 1 November 1996 to 22 May 1996.

3. The applicant states that when promoted by the board, her verification process included the 90th Reserve Support Command (RSC), which she joined in November 1996. She also states that she was serving in a CPT’s position at the time of her eligibility while assigned to the 484th Transportation Corps (TC) Battalion, which is a subordinate unit of the 63rd RSC. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her Officer Evaluation Report (OER) and a copy of her reassignment and promotion orders.

4. The applicant’s military records show that she had prior enlisted service in the USAR and Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG).

5. She was appointed as a second lieutenant in the INARNG on 5 May 1989. She continued to serve until she was honorably discharged from the INARNG on 31 October 1991. She was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

6. She was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant/0-2 effective on 5 May 1992.
The correct DOR should have been 4 May 1992 based on her date of appointment.

7. The applicant completed her Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree on 31 December 1992.

8. She was considered and not selected for promotion by the 1995 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB), which convened from 14 November to 15 December 1995. She was not qualified for promotion based on incomplete records. Her records failed to show that she completed her Bachelor of Arts (BA) prior to the convening date of the RCSB.

9. The applicant provided a copy of her OER that shows she was assigned to the 484th TC Battalion during the period 9 February to 20 September 1996. She also provided a copy of her reassignment orders that shows she was assigned to that Troop Program Unit (TPU) effective 9 February 1996.

10. The applicant appeared before a Reserve Component Promotion Advisory Board which convened on 12 November 1996 and adjourned on 27 November 1996. She was selected for promotion under the original criteria for Fiscal year (FY) 1995 promotion board for CPT.




11. On 22 May 1997, orders were published by Headquarters, United States Army Reserve Command, Atlanta, Georgia, which shows that she was promoted to the rank of captain/0-3 on 1 November 1996, with an eligibility date of 22 May 1996.

12. In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was provided by the US Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), Military Personnel Actions Branch. The applicant was provided 30 days to submit matters in rebuttal to this opinion; however, the applicant had not responded in over 30 days.

13. The opinion stated that the under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, (ROPMA), unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the approval date of the board or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the next higher grade. The applicant was assigned to a TPU on 9 February 1996. She was considered but not selected for promotion to captain on the 1996 CPT’s Army Promotion List (APL) due to not being educationally qualified. She was later promoted to CPT effective 1 November 1996, when she met the promotion criteria. The opinion recommended that the applicant’s change of date of rank be denied based on the facts and circumstances provided.

14. Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve Component officers. The regulation provides that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Reserve Component officers in an active status for promotion to first lieutenant through lieutenant colonel. The regulation also provides that the effective date of promotion will be the date the mandatory service and promotion eligibility requirements are completed, provided the officer is serving in a duty assignment requiring a higher grade than currently held by the officer. The regulation specifies that in order to be qualified for promotion to first lieutenant an individual must have completed an officer basic course and 3 years time in grade for promotion to captain, 4 years in grade for mandatory boards, 6 years of commissioned service, and a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board.

15. Paragraph 2-9b(6) of the same regulation states that lieutenants, if approved by the promotion authority, may be placed on the list of eligibles for promotion. This applies only to those lieutenants who have served creditably for 12 months or more in unit vacancies prescribed for CPT. An officer may not be promoted
more than once under this exception.


16. Under Title 10, United States Code (USC) Code, section 741d(2), the DOR of an officer who holds a grade as the result of a promotion, is the date of appointment to that grade, or in other words, the DOR is the effective date of promotion to that grade. The effective date of promotion and DOR will be the date the officer is assigned to a higher-grade position providing the officer meets all other qualifications for promotion.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The evidence of record shows that she was promoted to CPT on 1 November 1996, with an eligibility date of 22 May 1996. However, based on the original criteria and her selection for promotion by the Reserve Component Promotion Advisory Board, her correct eligibility date and DOR for promotion to CPT is 3 May 1996, 4 years from her correct DOR of 1LT (4 May 1992).

2. The Board notes that the applicant’s orders, dated 22 May 1997, by Headquarters, United States Army Reserve Command, Atlanta, Georgia, should be amended to show her correct DOR and eligibility date of 3 May 1996.

3. The applicant should be provided pay and allowances at the rank of captain beginning 3 May 1996. Therefore, she is entitled to back pay and allowances in the rank of captain from 3 May 1996 to 31 October 1996.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected:

a. by correcting her military records to show her DOR and eligibility date for CPT as 3 May 1996;

b. by amending the orders published by Headquarters, United States Army Reserve Command, Atlanta, Georgia, dated 22 May 1997, to show the entry “A: 3 May 1996” and the entry “B: 3 May 1996”; and








c. by showing that she is entitled to back pay and allowances in the rank of CPT from 3 May 1996 to 31 October 1996.

BOARD VOTE:

__sk___ __to____ __jm____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Stanley Kelley__
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064768
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020606
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 21
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061589C070421

    Original file (2001061589C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to captain (CPT) under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) be corrected from 12 June 1998 to 22 May 1997, date of her maximum time-in- grade (MTIG) as a first lieutenant (1LT). The applicant, whose MTIG for promotion was 22 May 1997, was considered for promotion to CPT by the 1996 Reserve Components Promotion Board. The applicant, who was assigned in a TPU, was promoted to CPT by an U. S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013391

    Original file (20080013391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a 2LT and 4 years as a 1LT before promotion to CPT. With respect to the applicant's DOR to CPT, the evidence of record shows that based on the maximum of 7 years of service as a 2LT and 1LT, the applicant's MYIG date for promotion to CPT was 30 May 1997. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing his effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004564

    Original file (20090004564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his direct commission into the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) in December 2003 to show he was appointed as a first lieutenant (1LT) instead of a second lieutenant (2LT) with a clinical commission as a 72D (Environmental Science Officer) based on his master's degree qualification. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted an application for appointment as a 70B MS officer in the ARNG. The applicant provides no supporting evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015324

    Original file (20140015324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he is presently serving in a position that is one rank higher than he presently holds * his record was corrected to show he was granted Federal recognition as a captain (CPT) with a date of rank (DOR) of 27 August 2010 * he should have been considered for promotion to MAJ on the September 2013 and March 2014 Position Vacancy Promotion Boards 3. On 12 August 2014, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's record to show he was granted Federal recognition as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019953

    Original file (20130019953 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She submitted an explanation with transcripts and was granted a second look for promotion to the rank of CPT and now believes she did not get a second look for promotion based on the absence of evidence to show she met the education requirements that she provided. On 5 March 2012, a memorandum was dispatched from the 99th Regional Support Command (RSC) notifying the applicant that she had been non-selected to the rank of CPT during her first consideration and that her records did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103311C070208

    Original file (2004103311C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a Department of the Army, memorandum, dated 31 May 2000; an INARNG letter of recommendation for promotion; a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 23 April 2001; a letter to a United States Senator, dated 1 July 2002; a letter of timeline of events, dated 15 November 2003; a copy of National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 55 AR, dated 4 March 2003; and two email messages. There is no evidence in the available records that show the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073123C070403

    Original file (2002073123C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board notes the applicant's contention that his DOR's for CPT and LTC should be adjusted based on his CSC awarded at appointment. Since his DOR for MAJ has been corrected to 6 June 1991, he is also eligible for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011090

    Original file (20090011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, while there is no basis upon which to authorize an adjustment of the applicant’s DOR at this time, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration by the FY 1994, 1995, and 1996 RCSBs, as confirmed in the HRC-St. Louis advisory opinion. If the SSB selects the applicant for promotion to CPT under an earlier criteria, her CPT promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027837

    Original file (20100027837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for [U.S. Army Reserve Command] Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 25 August 2003, shows his commander verified he was qualified for promotion. An officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date he/she completes the maximum service. The evidence of record does not show errors in the applicant's rank or DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002366

    Original file (20120002366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant's record be corrected by: a. adding the applicant's Bachelor of Science in Nursing; DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 22 March 2010; and official photograph to her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); and b. placing her corrected record before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to captain under the criteria of the 2010 and 2011 Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). The advisory official further...