Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066258C070421
Original file (2001066258C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 13 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001066258


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for major (MAJ) be adjusted from 3 January 2000 to 27 June 1999.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was selected by the Calendar Year (CY) 1999 Major Reserve Components, Army Promotion List (APL) Selection Board. The President approved the results on 3 January 2000, which was after his promotion eligibility date (PED). In support of his application, he submits a copy of his orders.

4. The applicant’s military records show he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Washington, DC National Guard, on 30 June 1985. He was promoted to first lieutenant on 29 June 1988.

5. He was promoted to captain/0-3 on 28 June 1992.

6. The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to MAJ by the
1999 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB), which convened on
2 March 1999, adjourned on 2 April 1999, whose recommendations were approved by the President on 3 January 2000, and the results announced on 14 January 2000.

7. The Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, issued a promotion memorandum, dated 14 January 2000, promoting the applicant to MAJ with an effective date and DOR of 3 January 2000. The memorandum also stated that the applicant was assigned to a position equal to or higher than the rank of MAJ.

8. The Chief, Promotions and Notification Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) provided an advisory opinion. The opinion stated that the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ by the 1999 RCSB with a PED of 25 June 1999. He was
subsequently promoted on orders dated 14 January 2000, with a DOR of 3 January 2000, the date the board was approved for release by the President. The opinion also stated that since the applicant met the time in grade (TIG)
requirement on 25 June 1999, it is recommended that he be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 25 June 1999, and an effective date of 3 January 2000. The opinion further recommended that the applicant’s request for an earlier DOR be approved. The applicant concurred with this recommendation.
The references to 25 June 1999 are believed to be a typographical error since the applicant’s PED is 27 June 1999.






9. The Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), a public law under Title 10, U. S. Code, enacted by Congress on 5 October 1994, prescribes the policies and procedures to consolidate and modernize the laws that govern Reserve Component officers. The ROPMA law became effective 1 October 1996. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) far enough in advance of completing a specified maximum years (time) in grade (MTIG), so that if the officer is selected for promotion the first time considered by a RCSB, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete the MTIG. The MTIG for promotion to captain is 5 years as a first lieutenant; for promotion to major is 7 years as a captain; for promotion to lieutenant colonel is 7 years as a major.

10. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U. S. Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21, states, “The effective date and date of promotion, to include officers recommended on a second or subsequent mandatory board, will be no earlier than the approval date of the board, the date of Senate confirmation (if required), or the date the officer meets maximum TIG, whichever is later.” Pay
and allowances are paid at the new rank based on the effective date. Time in grade for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade is calculated from the DOR. The regulation also states that an officer in a Reserve Troop Program Unit (TPU) or the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) must be assigned to the next higher-grade position to be promoted to the next higher grade or request transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve to be promoted.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was considered by a promotion board early enough to be promoted to the rank of MAJ on his MTIG as a CPT, 27 June 2000, as provided under ROPMA. On 27 June 1999, the applicant was serving in a position authorized an officer in the rank of MAJ and, therefore, was eligible for promotion to that higher rank on that date.

2. The Board notes the advisory opinion provided by AR-PERSCOM that stated that the applicant was selected for promotion by the 1999 RCSB with a PED of 25 June 1999, and met the TIG requirement on 25 June 1999, which was incorrect. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s PED and MTIG requirement was 27 June 1999, for promotion to major. Therefore, as a matter of justice, this Board recommends that his DOR for MAJ should be adjusted from 3 January 2000 to 27 June 1999.

3. Notwithstanding the delay, the effective date of promotion shall remain as 3 January 2000, the date the President approved the board, and the applicant is not further entitled to additional pay and allowances for the antedated promotion.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was promoted to MAJ effective 3 January 2000, with a DOR of 27 June 1999, with no further entitlement to additional pay or allowances based on these adjustments.

BOARD VOTE
:

___ca___ __dh____ __be___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____Celia L. Adolphi___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001066258
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020613
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 21
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006357C070205

    Original file (20060006357C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Roland Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a copy of a promotion memorandum from the U.S. Army Total Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM)-St. Louis, dated 12 May 1993, which shows that he was promoted to captain 26 May 1993. The opinion stated that the applicant was first time considered for captain and selected on the 1993 Captain DA Reserve Components Selection Board which convened...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067195C070402

    Original file (2002067195C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major (MAJ) under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) be corrected from 19 July 2000 to 28 June 2000. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) far enough...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007083

    Original file (20120007083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the "1994" (i.e., 1996) nonselection letter be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be restored to 1996 * his DOR to major (MAJ) be adjusted * he be promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) * any non-mandatory education requirements such as the Command and General Staff Officers Course (CGSOC) be waived for promotion to LTC, if necessary 2. His records contain a memorandum, dated 1 March 1996, issued by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062370C070421

    Original file (2001062370C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After being commissioned as a USAR CPT, the next available Department of the Army Reserve Components Mandatory Promotion Selection Board (RCSB) for MAJ convened on 24 March 1998. The applicant was first considered for promotion under ROPMA by the 2 March 1999 RCSB for MAJ and was selected for promotion on this first consideration. The applicant's MAJ promotion effective date and DOR of 3 January 2000, the date that the 1999 RCSB recommendations were approved, are correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008767C070205

    Original file (20060008767C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his dates of rank for first lieutenant, captain, major, and lieutenant colonel. He was promoted to lieutenant colonel with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 30 December 2005, based on the board approval date. The applicant was selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 2005 selection board with a PED of 18 May 2006, and promoted with a date of rank of 30 December 2005, the approval date of the board, in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011296

    Original file (20060011296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant was issued a promotion consideration memorandum, dated 26 September 2006, indicating that an SSB had recommended him for promotion to MAJ with an effective date and DOR for MAJ as 23 July 2006. He was issued promotion orders, dated 30 June 2006, indicating his promotion to MAJ by a SSB with a promotion effective date and DOR for MAJ of 2 July 2006, the date of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061067C070421

    Original file (2001061067C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), Title 10, U. S. Code (USC), section 14304, requires that an officer recommended for promotion by a selection board the first time the officer is considered, while in or above the promotion zone, and who is placed on an approved promotion list, be promoted not later than their maximum time-in-grade (MTIG) for their present grade. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000063C070206

    Original file (20050000063C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was selected for promotion to major by the 2000 RCSB with a promotion eligibility date (PED) of 26 April 1999. The opinion also stated that the applicant was subsequently promoted to major on 26 April 2002, with a DOR of 14 March 2002, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155. The applicant stated that he had called AHRC and was informed that he was passed over for promotion; however, he has provided no evidence, and there is none in the available records, to corroborate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009100

    Original file (20060009100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy or her promotion memorandum, dated 24 June 1998, which shows that she was promoted to lieutenant colonel effective 29 May 1998, with a date of rank (DOR) of 29 May 1998. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion provided in this case, ROPMA specifies that an officer cannot be promoted to the next higher grade prior to the approval date of the promotion board; however, this does not preclude a change to the applicant’s date of rank to her PED, based on MYIG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013779

    Original file (20110013779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 January 2006, he was issued Memorandum, Subject: Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty Memorandum that notified him he had been selected for promotion under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-155 to LTC by a board that adjourned on 30 September 2005. On 2 July 2012, he submitted a rebuttal wherein he stated: * The NGB omitted a fact that negates their opinion in that at the time of his selection for promotion to MAJ, he was in an AGR...