Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058028C070420
Original file (2001058028C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058028

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Mr. Thomas F. Baxter Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his uncharacterized description of service be changed to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: The applicant makes no additional statement. However, in his application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) he stated that while in basic training he was determined to have a personality disorder that has since developed into paranoid schizophrenia. He does not know why he was not given a medical discharge. He provides no supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 March 1993.

Between 3 April and 28 May 1993, the applicant received 19 negative counseling statements.

On 1 June 1993, during a mental status evaluation, the evaluating psychiatrist diagnosed the applicant with a personality disorder not otherwise specified.

On 3 June 1993, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, personality disorder.

On 3 June 1993, the applicant was advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated action. He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

On 10 June 1993, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be discharged with an entry-level separation.

On 15 June 1993, the applicant was discharged, with an uncharacterized description of service, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, personality disorder. He had completed 2 months and 29 days of creditable active service with no lost time.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty when so diagnosed by a physician trained in psychiatry and psychiatric diagnosis. The regulation further states that unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a soldier will be awarded an uncharacterized description of service if in an entry-level status. (For Regular Army soldiers, entry level status is the first 180 days of continuous active duty.)

Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, retention and separation. Paragraph 3-35 states that a personality disorder may render an individual administratively unfit rather than unfit because of physical disability. Interference with performance of effective duty in association with these conditions will be dealt with through appropriate administrative channels.

On 3 February 1999, the ADRB denied the applicant’s request for a change in his character of service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent military medical authority. By regulation, interference with performance of effective duty in association with this condition will be dealt with through appropriate administrative channels.

3. The uncharacterized discharge directed and the reasons therefor were appropriate considering all the facts of the case. An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a soldier’s military service. It merely means that the soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jh____ __tfb___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058028
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010816
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UNCHAR
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19930615
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, para 5-13
DISCHARGE REASON A86.00
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017225C070206

    Original file (20050017225C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, a medical discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his duties.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071886C070403

    Original file (2002071886C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Paragraph 5-13 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty when so diagnosed by a physician trained in psychiatry and psychiatric diagnosis. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show when he was diagnosed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998014364

    Original file (1998014364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 981215. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRAINCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002365

    Original file (20120002365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states when she was discharged from the Army, she had a permanent medical profile for her ankles. The examining psychologist diagnosed her with a "personality disorder, not otherwise specified" and stated she did not have a psychiatric condition that warranted disposition through medical channels, met the retention requirements of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), and did not require a medical board. There is no evidence in her available record and she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012977

    Original file (20060012977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. During its original review of the applicant’s case, the Board found that the applicant’s Report of Mental Status Evaluation confirmed that he suffered from many symptoms warranting his separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of personality disorder and that his separation processing was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003097

    Original file (20090003097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that while he was in the Army he was diagnosed with a personality disorder and should have received a medical discharge. On 2 January 1991, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 (Separation because of personality disorder) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) based on the applicant's diagnosis of a personality disorder by the Division psychiatrist. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000651

    Original file (20120000651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander stated the applicant had been diagnosed as having a personality disorder which was not amenable to hospitalization, treatment, transfer, disciplinary action, training, or reclassification of duty within the military. On 11 September 1989, he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of personality disorder. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003717

    Original file (20110003717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of all records from his official military personnel file (OMPF) of him having a mental illness/personality disorder. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, and duty performance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085236C070212

    Original file (2003085236C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009494

    Original file (20120009494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 31 May 2007, shows the applicant was counseled for violating Policy Letter Number 15-16. The applicant was accordingly discharged on 27 September 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, based on a physical condition, not a disability, with an uncharacterized discharge. It identifies the SPD of "JFV" as the appropriate code to assign to enlisted Soldiers administratively discharged under the provisions of...