| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election be changed to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states that it was always his intention that his former spouse continue to be his SBP beneficiary after their divorce in January 1999 and therefore had that stipulation put into the divorce decree. He provides his current spouse’s concurrence with his request for change in his election.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 15 January 1971. He retired on 1 December 1991. At that time he enrolled in the SBP for spouse and children coverage.
5. On an unknown date but apparently in January 1999, the applicant divorced. The divorce decree is not available. He remarried on 2 October 1999.
6. Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Elections are made by category, not by name, and are irrevocable except under certain circumstances.
7. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
8. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
9. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence of Government error in this case. The applicant originally elected SBP coverage in the category of spouse and child. The statute required he make a written request to change his coverage to former spouse (and child) coverage within one year of the date of divorce. In the absence of his doing so, his former spouse could have made a written request, within one year of the date of divorce, for a deemed election. Neither took the action provided for by law to make this change.
2. However, the applicant states that it was always his intention to provide the SBP for his former spouse and that it was entered in the divorce decree. His current spouse has agreed to his requested change. SBP costs may be owed if his spouse coverage was suspended during the period between the date of his divorce and the date of his remarriage and it would be appropriate for those costs to be paid to the Government.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a change to his SBP from spouse and child coverage to former spouse and child coverage on 1 June 1999 and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office.
2. That the applicant be advised that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __cjp___ __lds___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001057309 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010830 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057137C070420
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant originally elected RCSBP coverage in the category of spouse and child. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a change to his RCSBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064691C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce on 16 November 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085250C070212
The applicant states that the court ordered divorce decree required him to provide SBP coverage, with his FS as the beneficiary, with the proviso that the FS make all necessary payments required for continuation of coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073887C070403
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Although the evidence shows that neither the applicant nor his former spouse made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage within the one-year time frame, the applicant states that it is his intention...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015984C070206
John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063381C070421
On 19 February 1995, the applicant requested DFAS provide him the forms necessary to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse in order to comply with the court directive. The applicant has provided evidence to show he requested information from DFAS on how to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce. change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068603C070402
The applicant was thereupon enrolled in the SBP. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. When the applicant divorced Cynthia in October 1996, the court ordered him to elect former spouse coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013171
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her former spouse's records to show she made a deemed election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year of their divorce. d. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. f. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060936C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records be corrected to show her request for a deemed election of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), was received in a timely manner. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a deemed election of the FSM’s SBP and forwarded the request and a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS on 27 August 1999. That the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084955C070212
As supporting evidence, the applicant provides a portion of the divorce decree; the FSM's last DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); the FSM's death certificate; a letter, dated 24 January 1995, from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Indianapolis Center (DFAS-IN) to the FSM; an extract from an Internet site explaining the SBP; the FSM's VA Form 29-8286 (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election) dated 2 July 1979 showing he had elected "by law"...