| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Charles Gainor | Member | |
| Mr. Joe R. Schroeder | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: That his separation is representative of "the type of [nonsense] that goes on" in the military and that the Army owes him a years' pay.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 11 September 1979 for a period of 3 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewman). He completed basic and advanced individual training and was assigned to Germany on 3 January 1980.
On 3 December 1980, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of
four specifications of assault against fellow service members. He was sentenced to forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 4 months and confinement at hard labor for 4 months. He was transferred to the United States Army Retraining Brigade, Fort Riley, Kansas where he served his sentence from 3 December 1980 through 8 January 1981.
On 14 January 1981, the unexecuted portion of the applicant's sentence to confinement was suspended and, on 4 March 1981, the unexecuted portion of his sentence pertaining to forfeiture of pay was suspended. On 30 March 1981, he was assigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.
On 17 September 1981, the applicant's installation check-cashing privileges were suspended. The facts surrounding this matter are not contained in the available records.
On 5 October 1981, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of three specifications of disobeying a lawful order on 26 June and on 6 and 9 July 1981. He was also convicted of failure to repair on 7 and 9 July 1981. He was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for 2 months and to forfeiture $100.00 pay per month for 2 months.
On 25 September 1982, the applicant received a letter of counseling from his battalion commander. The subject of the counseling is unknown (the counseling statement is not a matter of record).
In December 1982, he received a civil conviction for joyriding. He was fined $200.00, but the sentence was suspended for 11 months and 29 days.
On 7 March 1983, a bar to reenlistment was initiated against the applicant. Among other things, the applicant's commander cited three nonjudicial punishments (NJP's) that the applicant received on 19 March, 25 April and 11 August 1980 (these documents are no longer contained in the available records); the 3 December 1980 and the 5 October 1981 courts-martial actions; the suspension of his installation check-cashing privileges, and his December 1982 civil conviction as the bases for his recommendation.
On 17 March 1983, the applicant indicated in a statement written in his own behalf that he was dedicated to his profession and that he felt the bar was "double jeopardy," because his civil conviction had nothing to do with the military. He requested that the barring action be remitted. On 25 March 1983, the bar to reenlistment was approved.
On 14 April 1983, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for failure to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time on 2 April 1983. His punishment included reduction from pay grade E-3 to pay grade E-2, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 1 month and 14 days' extra duty.
On 3 June 1983, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of threatening a noncommissioned officer (NCO) in a belligerent, contemptuous manner on 11 April 1983; of failure to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed on 18, 22 and 25 April 1983; of being disrespectful in language towards a NCO on 20 April 1983; and of being absent from his unit on 29 April 1983. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months, forfeiture of $382.00 pay per month for 6 months, and to be separated with a BCD.
On 22 July 1983, the convening authority approved the adjudged sentence. The record of trial was forwarded to the United States Army Court of Military Review for appellate review.
On 28 October 1983, that portion of the sentence pertaining to confinement having been served, the applicant was released from confinement and placed on excess leave (leave without pay) pending completion of his appellate review. On 29 May 1984, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and the approved sentence.
On 11 December 1984, the applicant was discharged in absentia under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 with a BCD. He had completed 4 years, 7 months, and 7 days of active military service. He also had 234 days lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11, provides that a soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge (DD) or BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judiciary process. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section
1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered
to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the
appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. The available records contain evidence that indicates the applicant was a habitual offender who continuously committed acts of misconduct. He has established no basis for clemency.
4. There is no evidence that the applicant is entitled to any back pay and he has provided no evidence to the contrary. No pay records were available for review. It is noted that the time the applicant spent on excess leave awaiting completion of his appellate review was not payable.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__LLS___ ___CG__ __JRS___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2000050303 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | 20011010 |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010724 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (BCD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19820812 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, Chapter 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6800 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014369
This form further shows the applicant's character of service as bad conduct discharge and that he completed 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days of creditable military service. There is no indication in the applicant's records that he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulation, and the discharge appropriately characterized...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000441
The available records show the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his enlistment and 20 years and 6 months old at the time of discharge. There is no evidence that indicates he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055013C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The time for the applicant to file a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007925C070205
The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. He was discharged pursuant to sentence of a special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060704C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 15 April 1983, the applicant was discharged with a BCD pursuant to his sentence by general court-martial. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007647
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 29 October 1976, for 4 years. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. The applicant's available military records and documentation submitted with his application contain no matters upon which the Board may grant clemency and an upgrade of his BCD to an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006948
On 21 March 1983, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of a special court-martial and he was issued a BCD. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant has not provided evidence to show that his discharge was unjust or evidence sufficient to mitigate the character of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066039C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 8 September 1982, the convening authority approved the sentence adjudged and the applicant’s record of trial was forwarded to the United States Court of Military Review. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007638
On 9 February 1983, the United States Army Court of Military Review examined the case and found the findings of guilty and sentence as approved by proper authority correct in law and fact; it determined, on the basis of the entire record, that they should be approved. Special Court-Martial Order Number 577, Headquarters, United States Army Correctional Activity, Fort Riley, Kansas, dated 16 September 1983, stated that the sentence to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004311
On 24 December 1980, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, as a result of a court-martial with a BCD. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by two courts-martial, the last of which ordered his BCD.