| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his enlistment, he was young and he had experienced the tragic loss of both his father and older brother within a year. He enlisted in the military for structure, discipline and mature guidance. At age 40 years, he is mature and he understands the importance of a clean history. Since being discharged, he has joined a church and he has become an honorable, respectable citizen. He has been remorseful for the past 20 years because he understands that he must take responsibility for his actions and suffer the consequences for those actions. He is asking for mercy not only for himself, but also for his family. His son wants to follow in his footsteps and he is ashamed to tell him that he has a discharge that is less than honorable. An upgrade may also entitle him to receive veteran's benefits.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That on 3 November 1980, he enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP). On 13 January 1981, at age 20, he was discharged from the DEP and he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 76P (Materiel Control and Accounting Specialist). Following completion of all required military training; he was awarded MOS 76P and assigned to Germany on 1 June 1981.
On 14 June 1982, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of selling marijuana in the hashish form on 1 and 27 February 1982. He was sentenced to reduction from pay grade E-3 to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 3 months, confinement at hard labor for 75 days, and to be discharged with a BCD.
On 12 August 1982, while confined at the United States Army Retraining Brigade, Fort Riley, Kansas, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), was imposed against the applicant for failure to obey a lawful order given by a noncommissioned officer on 11 August 1982. His punishment included forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 1 month, 2 hours of extra duty, and restriction for 1 day.
On the same date, the applicant was released from confinement and he was placed on excess leave.
On 8 September 1982, the convening authority approved the sentence adjudged and the applicant’s record of trial was forwarded to the United States Court of Military Review.
On 21 July 1983, the United States Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and approved the sentence and the appropriate authority ordered the BCD to be duly executed.
On 3 August 1983, the applicant was discharged in absentia under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, with a BCD as a result of his conviction in a trial by court-martial. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that he completed 2 years, 4 months and 21 days of active military service and he had 60 days of lost time due to being in military confinement.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11, provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judiciary process. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section
1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. The Board has also taken into consideration the applicant’s contention that he was young and immature. However, at the time of his enlistment, he met all entrance qualification standards, to include age. There is no evidence that he was any less mature than other soldiers who successfully completed their military service obligation.
5. Additionally, there is no evidence available to indicate that personal problems contributed to the applicant's actions. Even if true, he had many other legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance with his personal problems without committing the offense that led to his separation.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__KAK__ __MDM__ __TL ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001066039 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020423 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (BCD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19830803 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6800 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001852
The applicant requests an upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD). He completed 2 years, 3 months, and 13 days of net active service this period with 11 months and 7 days of time lost due to being absent from his unit and confinement. The applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005023
The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Records show that the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his offenses.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007322
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007322 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002383
There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable or general discharge is not warranted in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000441
The available records show the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his enlistment and 20 years and 6 months old at the time of discharge. There is no evidence that indicates he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000523
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record confirms, contrary to his pleas, an SPCM convicted the applicant of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007236
Headquarters, U.S. Army Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KS, General Court-Martial Order Number 875, dated 15 November 1982, shows that, after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews, the convening authority ordered the applicant's dishonorable discharge sentence executed. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-10, provides that a Soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial and that a Soldier will...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019524
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 May 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120019524 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000824
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He completed 2 years, 5 months, and 4 days of net active service. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005173
The applicant was discharged on 11 May 1984. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of private/E-1 as a result of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 3, with a bad conduct discharge. Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.