| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Mr. James E. Vick | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Barr | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. He states that his discharge was unjust due to the circumstances of his case at the time. He further states that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident which was not of physical harm and he only had 6 months left before his expiration of term of service date.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years as a private pay grade E-1 on 24 August 1977. He was 20 years of age at the time of enlistment. His expiration of term of service was 23 August 1980.
His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) shows his date entered on active duty as 24 August 1978 (sic).
On 8 October 1977, he received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for wrongful possession of one ounce of a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. His punishment included restriction to a Correctional Custody Facility for 5 days and forfeiture of some pay for 1 month.
On 21 February 1978, he was reported absent without leave (AWOL). He returned to duty on 22 February 1978.
He attained the grade of private first class on 1 July 1978.
On 15 November 1978, he was tried by a special court-martial of unlawful receiving and buying a television, the property of another soldier, that he knew to be stolen. He pleaded guilty to the charge. He was found guilty and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days and forfeiture of $75.00 pay for 4 months.
On 31 January 1979, the unexecuted portion of the approved sentence to forfeiture for 4 months was suspended until 10 April 1979.
On 4 January 1980, he received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ for failure to go to his appointed place of duty. His punishment included suspended reduction to pay grade E-2, forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 6 August 1980, a general court-martial convened and charged the applicant with one specification of assault and one specification of wrongful communication of a threat to kill. He pleaded guilty to the charges.
He was found guilty of all the charges. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 2 years, reduction to pay grade E-1 and a BCD. On 7 December 1983 the sentence as adjudged was approved, except the confinement was reduced to 1 year.
He was released from confinement and placed on adjudged parole on 1 July 1981 until 5 April 1982. He was placed on excess leave for an indefinite time pending completion of appellate review.
He was separated on 23 December 1983 with a BCD under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-11, as a result of court-martial. His total net active service was 4 years, 4 months and 8 days (sic). His periods of lost time were 15 November to 7 December 1978, 25 April to 22 May 1980, 6 June to 23 August 1980, and 24 August 1980 to 5 April 1982. He also had 627 days of excess leave.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-11, of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided for the separation of personnel with an approved sentence to a BCD, after completion of the appellate review and after the sentence had been affirmed.
Trial by general court-martial was warranted by the serious nature of the multiple offenses charged, the conviction is final and the sentence is commensurate with the misconduct of which the applicant was convicted.
The presumption of regularity applies in this case. The records are presumed correct and the applicant has the burden to show otherwise.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 23 December 1983, the date of his discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 23 December 1986.
The application is dated 28 February 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of the case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit the application within the three-year time limit.
NOTE: Request the Army Review Boards Agency, Support Division correct the applicant’s separation document (DD Form 214), Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) to show 24 August 1977 and Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) to show 5 years, 4 months and 8 days.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_jve____ _bje_______ _wdb__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001055013 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010821 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | A68.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006411
Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, Fort Dix, NJ, Special Court-Martial Order Number 79, dated 2 November 1978, shows that, after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews, the convening authority ordered the applicants bad conduct discharge executed. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged in accordance with chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) as a result of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015230
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 22 November 1983, the SJA summarized the applicant's request for clemency and recommended approval of the sentence as adjudged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060057C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 14 November 1986, the U. S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066379C070402
On 6 November 1978, the separation authority approved the board of officers recommendation and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service for misconduct due to frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with a general discharge. In accordance with a recommendation from a board of officers, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct. The Board reviewed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100735C070208
The applicant was found guilty and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 3 months, forfeiture of $279.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to private/E-1, and a BCD. The Board is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process, and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074480C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The convening authority did not agree with the recommendation of the investigating officer and directed that the applicant be tried by a general court-martial. Although his accomplice ended up with a less harsh sentence than he did, the applicant was granted an upgrade of his discharge from a BCD to a general discharge by the Army Clemency and Parole Board and he has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010924
The applicant was discharged on 11 September 1980 with a BCD. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010924 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010924 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014760
The applicant did not appeal the punishment and the commander directed the filing of the NJP to his Military Personnel Records Jacket. In return the convening authority agreed to suspend, for a period of one year from the date of his action, so much of any sentence to confinement to hard labor in excess of 12 months and 1 day. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057265C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 29 August 1976.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086025C070212
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 23 August 1984 in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, section IV, as a result of court-martial. After reviewing the applicant service record, the Board found no basis upon which to grant clemency and an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.