Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057199C070420
Original file (2001057199C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 July 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057199

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Shirley L. Powell Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was misled by persons that he could take a short discharge and reenlist for overseas duty and get help with his problems but it only added to his problems. While he was assigned to Fort Benning, GA, he went to town, got to drinking heavily, met a woman, and got married the same night. He did not find this out until the next day. After about two weeks, he learned that she was already married. He moved back to post. He asked the personnel officer if he could get some help with his problem but was told the Army could not help him. He got to talking to other people and was told about taking a short discharge to go overseas and while there go to the Red Cross and they could help him. However, when he went to them, they said he would have to wait until he returned to the States. He started drinking again and went absent without leave (AWOL) for about 4 or 5 days. When he returned he received a summary court-martial and was reduced. After his overseas tour, he was assigned to Fort Hamilton, NY where he tried again to get help but to no avail. He went AWOL again. The military police picked him up and he was sent to the stockade for 30 days. He went before a board and after a lot of questions he was given an undesirable discharge. He does not think any of this would have happened if the Army or the Red Cross would have tried to help him. He provides copies of letters and his discharge certificates if they will help in any way.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire in 1973. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The applicant was born on 25 April 1925. He was inducted into the Army on 18 June 1943 and entered active service on 2 July 1943. He was honorably discharged on 8 January 1946 after serving in the Pacific Theater of Operations.

On 19 July 1948, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army. He was honorably discharged on 18 July 1951 for the purpose of immediately reenlisting on 19 July 1951. He was honorably discharged again on 28 September 1953 for the purpose of immediately reenlisting on 29 September 1953. At this time he held the rank of Sergeant.

The applicant’s discharge packet is not available. On 8 May 1956, he was discharged with an undesirable discharge.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2. The applicant does not explain what he expected the Army or the Red Cross to do for him. He states his problems started with his marriage to a woman who was already married. His marriage was a civil matter that would have had to have been resolved in the civil courts. He was not a young, inexperienced soldier. It appears he may have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of this marriage with several years of military experience behind him. He should have known that the Army could not resolve a civil problem and that going AWOL was contrary to the Army’s rules of good order and discipline.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__fne___ __slp___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057199
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010717
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509696C070209

    Original file (9509696C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he was honorably discharged on 11 February 1946 in order to reenlist, the record showed that, from 1939 to 1946, a period of 6 years, 4 months, and 15 days, the applicant had 2 years, 6 months, and 4 days of lost time under Article of War 107 due to AWOL, desertion, and confinement. He was tried and convicted by a general court-martial in 1940 and sentenced to confinement and a DD. His final AWOL in October 1951 appears to have been a genuine desertion as he had forsaken his military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082338C070215

    Original file (2002082338C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board also notes that it appears these instances of AWOL occurred after the allotment problem to his family started. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and, considering the length of the applicant's AWOL, a punitive discharge would have appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087490C070212

    Original file (2003087490C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. APPLICANT STATES : That he went absent without leave (AWOL) for pertinent reasons.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063863C070421

    Original file (2001063863C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Information contained herein was obtained from his record of trial and a memorandum for the Secretary of the Army dated 3 March 1954 responding to the applicant’s application to the Board for a change in his discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009020

    Original file (20140009020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to honorable and correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). On 22 July 1976, the applicant appeared in person before the ADRB and testified under oath that – * he enlisted to better his education and or training to get some kind of training that he couldn't otherwise get or afford * he first started having problems in the service when he couldn't get an allotment for his wife * the entire time he was in Germany it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063893C070421

    Original file (2001063893C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that he was requesting the discharge because his spouse: Her mother has stated my wife can stay there only long enough in order for me to apply for this discharge and get home to take care of my wife. On 13 May 1968 the applicant's request for hardship discharge was denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02044

    Original file (BC-2007-02044.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only 17 when he entered the military, and he was not convicted in any military court. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 December 1953, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012065C080213

    Original file (20070012065C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. That contention appears to be corroborated by the statement he made at the time he requested discharge. In his request for discharge, he stated he went AWOL after escaping from his guard and had no intention of returning after he had been gone for over 30 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075966C070403

    Original file (2002075966C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was granted leave in the States from 9 November through 8 December 1974. On 19 October 1975, the applicant surrendered to military authorities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005605

    Original file (20080005605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. On 11 May 1973, the applicant's commander recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Army with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service.