| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded.
3. The applicant states that he is 81 years old and dying of heart disease. He would like to get rid of this dishonorable discharge.
4. The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the Military Personnel Records Center fire in 1973. Information contained herein was obtained from his Report of Trial and from reconstructed records.
5. The applicant was inducted into the Army in February 1944. He served in the European Theater of Operations where he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and, based upon that award, the Bronze Star Medal. He was honorably separated on 30 March 1949. He was recalled to active duty on 4 October 1950. He was honorably discharged on 7 December 1951 for the purpose of immediately reenlisting on 8 December 1951.
6. On 15 January 1952, while at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 9 to on or about 13 January 1952.
7. On 2 April 1952, while at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of breaking restriction.
8. Apparently, the applicant was assigned to the 372d Engineer Aviation Battalion, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, sometime after 2 April 1952.
9. On 28 April 1952, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 10 to on or about 22 April 1952 and of breaking restriction.
10. On 17 December 1952, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of being AWOL from on or about 29 April to on or about 15 October 1952. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for 6 months. The applicant, his spouse, and his sister had testified at his trial that he departed AWOL to go home and take care of his family. Due to an administrative change in the source of allotment checks, his spouse last received an allotment check in January 1952. The Red Cross could not help in a timely manner. He asked for but could not get a leave to go home. He went home to get a job and earn enough money to tide his family over until the allotment would restart and he could return to the Army.
11. On 29 January 1953, the Board of Review, U. S. Army affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.
12. During annual clemency hearings in 1953, clemency was disapproved.
13. On 12 May 1953, the applicant was discharged, with a dishonorable discharge, pursuant to his sentence by court-martial.
14. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552(f) states that, with respect to records of courts-martial tried or reviewed under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Board's action may extend only to action on the sentence of a court-martial for purposes of clemency.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes that the applicant had previously been convicted by summary and/or special courts-martial for basically the same offense (AWOL). However, the Board also notes that it appears these instances of AWOL occurred after the allotment problem to his family started. The Board believes there is a reasonable presumption that those earlier AWOLs were related to his family's financial problem.
2. Still, the Board notes that the applicant was an experienced soldier. There is no evidence to show he attempted to resolve his family's financial problems by more accepted means (i.e., trying to obtain a Red Cross loan or sending his family money orders).
3. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and, considering the length of the applicant's AWOL, a punitive discharge would have appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.
4. However, the Board concludes that a dishonorable discharge was too harsh. Although the applicant's AWOL occurred during a time of war, he was stationed in Florida at the time, not in a combat zone. The Board accepts the applicant's testimony that he was only trying to help out his family after the Government improperly stopped his allotment as a mitigating factor and concludes it would be equitable to upgrade his discharge to a bad conduct discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was separated from the service with a bad conduct discharge on 12 May 1955.
2. That the Department issue to the applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate, dated 12 May 1955, in lieu of the Dishonorable Discharge of the same date now held by him.
3. That the applicant be issued a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflecting the above corrections.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __sk____ _gjw____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Raymond v. O'Connor_
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002082338 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030522 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Schneider |
| ISSUES 1. | 105.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509696C070209
When he was honorably discharged on 11 February 1946 in order to reenlist, the record showed that, from 1939 to 1946, a period of 6 years, 4 months, and 15 days, the applicant had 2 years, 6 months, and 4 days of lost time under Article of War 107 due to AWOL, desertion, and confinement. He was tried and convicted by a general court-martial in 1940 and sentenced to confinement and a DD. His final AWOL in October 1951 appears to have been a genuine desertion as he had forsaken his military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709694C070209
On 23 July 1953, the suspended sentence was vacated. On 6 August 1953, the applicant was released from the Army with a bad conduct discharge There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board when it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709694
He was sentenced to receive a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to confinement at hard labor for 3 months. He regained his memory in the Temple City Jail on 5 July 1953. On 6 August 1953, the applicant was released from the Army with a bad conduct discharge
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007163C070208
The applicant, as the wife of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that clemency in the form of an upgrade to his discharge be granted. When the FSM returned, he was discharged with a dishonorable discharge. The FSM’s military records are not available to the Board for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006372
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070006372 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's military records are not available for review. The applicant requests that the Board pardon his actions during his military service and upgrade his dishonorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063863C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Information contained herein was obtained from his record of trial and a memorandum for the Secretary of the Army dated 3 March 1954 responding to the applicant’s application to the Board for a change in his discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8109128
On 18 September 1956, a member of Congress, who had submitted a request for reconsideration on the applicant’s behalf, was advised by the Executive Secretary of the Board that the regulations governing the Board’s operation provide that it could deny an application without a hearing if it determined that insufficient evidence had been presented to indicate probable material error or injustice; that, under such regulations, the Board had reconsidered the application and the information...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012545C071029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012545 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Board upgraded his discharge from dishonorable to general under honorable conditions in 1978.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707196
The record of trial shows that the applicant stated that he was in the National Guard for a year and a half prior to joining the Army, that he had a 16 year old and a 5 month old sister, that his father was unable to work, and his mother did not work. The applicant was found guilty of the charge and sentenced him to be discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit $50.00 a month for six months, and to be confined at hard labor for six months. DISCUSSION : Considering...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006506
The applicant's military records are not available for review. On 7 December 1954, he was convicted by a general court-martial of being AWOL from 16 June to 28 October 1954 and he was sentenced to be discharged with a BCD. Accordingly, his sentence was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of his discharge based on clemency.