Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057145C070420
Original file (2001057145C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 1 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057145

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his College Access Loan (CAL) be paid under the terms of his Loan Repayment Program (LRP) addendum.

APPLICANT STATES: That when he enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) he asked his recruiter if all of his college loans were payable under the LRP. His recruiter told him that he wasn’t sure if all his loans were payable, and instructed him to ask that question of the people who would process his enlistment into the Regular Army at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS). When he complied with those instructions, the people processing his enlistment into the Regular Army at the MEPS told him that as long as his loans totaled less than $65,000.00 he would have nothing to worry about.

In support of his application he submits a memorandum from his recruiter who states that he wasn’t sure whether a promissory note that was given to him by the applicant was payable, so he sent a facsimile of the note to his brigade headquarters. When he (the recruiter) didn’t receive a solid answer on the eligibility of the note to be paid under the LRP, he instructed the applicant to take that note to the MEPS when he was processed for enlistment and shipment and they would inform him then whether it was payable or not.

Also submitted by the applicant is a letter sent to him by the US Total Army Personnel Command in which he is informed that his CAL was not made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and, therefore, is not payable under the LRP.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the DEP on 22 October 1999. He chose the enlistment options of training of choice for Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence, of a $12,000.00 cash bonus, and the LRP.

He enlisted in the Regular Army for 5 years in pay grade E-4 on 19 January 2000.

At the time the applicant submitted his request to the Board, he was serving on active duty in pay grade E-4.

The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00, whichever is less, of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans for each year of active duty a soldier completes.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 2171, limits loans that are eligible for repayment under the LRP to those made, insured, or guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. While the applicant has demonstrated that his recruiter was unable to ascertain whether his CAL was payable under the LRP, he has not proven that he was misinformed by the people processing his enlistment into the Regular Army at the MEPS.

2. The applicant received an enlistment bonus of $12,000.00 and training for a high skill military occupational specialty, both of which are significant enlistment incentives. There is no evidence which would indicate that the applicant would have declined his enlistment, and with his enlistment a large bonus and skill training, if his CAL was not payable under the LRP. As such, absent documentation to show that he was misinformed of his CAL’s eligibility to be paid under the LRP by the people processing his enlistment in the MEPS, the Board will not recommend that his request be approved.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

__wtm __ ___aao__ ____clg _ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057145
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011101
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074812C070403

    Original file (2002074812C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records should be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002067C070206

    Original file (20050002067C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program shows that he enlisted for the LRP up to a maximum repayment of $65,000 in addition to other incentives. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096503C070212

    Original file (03096503C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant's enlistment contract, which he completed in February 2002, shows that he stated that he understood that only certain loans would be paid by the Army under the LRP. Consequently, the applicant's request for payment of all his student loans cannot be granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000528C070206

    Original file (20050000528C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to have his Sallie Mae loans paid under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP). The applicant’s military records should be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051600C070420

    Original file (2001051600C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 February 2001, the applicant’s recruiter made a sworn statement that he enlisted her with the understanding that her student loans would qualify for the LRP. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in good faith for the Loan Repayment Program incentive on 20 January 2000 up to a maximum amount of $65,000.00. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000311C070208

    Original file (20040000311C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the LRP or the repayment or default of the loan, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040010264C070208

    Original file (040010264C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The branch did indicate that he did have loans of $17,620.67 other than the private loans that did qualify for repayment under the LRP, and that the appropriate payments would be authorized toward his qualifying loans. In his rebuttal, dated 22 January 2005, the applicant stated that he was never provided a copy of the education act [cited in the advisory opinion], but was persuaded by his guidance counselor and his recruiter that all of his loans qualified and would be repaid in full by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087287C070212

    Original file (2003087287C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    if enlisting for the LRP [Loan Repayment Program], disenroll the applicant or soldier from the GI Bill; and c.) verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if enlisting for the LRP. Wide discretions are available to this Board under Title 10, US Code, Section 1552, which includes the authority to amend the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66 to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086145C070212

    Original file (2003086145C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. That form contained a number of statements, to include, "If the incentive … is for the … LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM (LRP), I understand that I must DISENROLL from the GI Bill in order to qualify for the program.…If I fail to complete the disenrollment portion of the DD Form 2366, I will not be eligible for the LRP and will become automatically enrolled in the GI Bill," and, "I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074362C070403

    Original file (2002074362C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : No time or effort was taken by the personnel processing his enlistment to tell him which of his loans would and wouldn’t be paid under the LRP. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: