Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074362C070403
Original file (2002074362C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 24 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074362

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In two applications, that his signature loans and his collegiate loans be paid under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP).

APPLICANT STATES: No time or effort was taken by the personnel processing his enlistment to tell him which of his loans would and wouldn’t be paid under the LRP. The counselor at the Military Entrance Processing Station gave him an “O.K.” to all of his promissory notes, indicating that they all would be paid under the LRP.

In support of his request the applicant submits copies of the signature loans and collegiate loans which were not paid under the LRP.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 2001 for 4 years in pay grade E-4. In conjunction with his enlistment he executed addenda for a $4,000.00 enlistment bonus and the LRP.

On 8 May 2002, the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) informed the applicant that his signature loans weren't payable under the LRP because they were not made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965. On 29 May 2002, the PERSCOM informed the applicant that his collegiate loans were not payable under the LRP for the same reason.

The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00 of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans, whichever is greater, for each year of active duty a soldier completes.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 2171, limits loans that are eligible for repayment under the LRP to those made, insured, or guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s signature and collegiate loans are not payable under the LRP in accordance with law and regulation because they were not made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

2. The applicant’s statement to the Board is confusing. He states that he wasn’t told which of his loans were payable and which loans weren’t payable. But then he states that he was told that all his loans were payable. Nonetheless, under either scenario, he has submitted no evidence to substantiate his allegations.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____kwl _ ___dph__ ___aao__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002074362
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020924
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064385C070421

    Original file (2001064385C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that his recruiter told him that all of his student loans would be repaid as part of his LRP enlistment incentive. As part of the applicant’s enlistment processing he initialed a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) indicating that he understood “that under this program (LRP) that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073983C070403

    Original file (2002073983C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00, whichever is greater, of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans for each year of active duty a soldier completes. Since the applicant acknowledged that she understood that only those loans which were made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965 were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073843 C070403

    Original file (2002073843 C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s Alternative Loans do not qualify for payment under the LRP since they weren't made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965. that only loans made or insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965 would be payable under the LRP, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055343C070420

    Original file (2001055343C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that his recruiter told him that all of his student loans would be repaid as part of his LRP enlistment incentive. At the time of his enlistment the applicant completed several enlistment forms indicating that a cash enlistment bonus in the amount of $4,000.00 and the Student Loan Repayment Program were part of his enlistment incentives.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056240C070420

    Original file (2001056240C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PERSCOM recommended the applicant’s petition for reimbursement be denied because he never submitted the loan verification documents and reimbursement after the fact was not authorized. However, the Board concludes that had the applicant been completely familiar with the processing requirement for repayment of his student loans he would have followed the progress of the DD Form 2475 to the Sallie Mae Serving Corporation to ensure that it was returned to PERSCOM for finalization and payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090469C070212

    Original file (2003090469C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Loans that qualify for repayment under the LRP are Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students, Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS), and consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087289C070212

    Original file (2003087289C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in essence, that his student loan be paid in accordance with his enlistment option for the Army Student Loan Repayment Program (LRP). In connection with this application, a PERSCOM advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) states, in essence, that terms outlined in the applicant's enlistment contract -- Statement of Understanding US Army Incentive Enlistment Program, DA Form 3286-66, Section 4, item a -- state, "I understand that under the LRP the government will repay a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000186C070206

    Original file (20050000186C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims the Army now indicates that his loans received from the Wells Fargo Education Financial Services (WFEFS) and Firstmark Services do not qualify for repayment under the LRP and he was advised to apply to this Board for relief. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084187C070212

    Original file (2003084187C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that her recruiter told her that all of her student loans would be repaid as part of her LRP enlistment incentive. At the time of her enlistment the applicant completed several enlistment forms indicating that the Student Loan Repayment Program was part of her enlistment incentives.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087990C070212

    Original file (2003087990C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the applicant submits copies of her promissory notes which are stamped by her Army Guidance Counselor and dated 29 February 2000, these promissory notes are not contained in her military records. This would indicate that the guidance counselor did not have the applicant’s promissory notes on the date of her enlistment into the Regular Army. It is noted that the applicant received a $17,000.00 cash bonus and had $16,600.00 in student loans paid under the LRP, for a total of...