Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053511C070420
Original file (2001053511C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 8 March 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001053511


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Roger W. Able Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Lutz Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States, DD Form 4/1, be corrected to show he enlisted in pay grade E-3.

3. The applicant states that his DD Form 4/1 erroneously shows he enlisted in pay grade E-4.

4. The applicant’s DD Form 4/1, item 8 erroneously shows he enlisted in the Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP) on 14 December 2000 in pay grade E-4.

5. The applicant’s DD Form 4/3, item 21, shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 February 2001 in pay grade E-3. The U. S. Army Recruiting Command Liaison at Fort Leonard Wood, MO verifies that the applicant’s DD Form 4/1 should show he enlisted in the DEP in pay grade E-3.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/1. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the DEP on 14 December 2000 in pay grade E-3, not pay grade E-4.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the applicant’s DD Form 4/1 dated 14 December 2000, item 8 be corrected to show he enlisted in pay grade E-3.

BOARD VOTE:

__rwa___ __bjl___ __wdp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Roger W. Able
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001053511
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010308
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 112.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054106C070420

    Original file (2001054106C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/3. The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 09 November 2000 for 4 years and 00 weeks. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 09 November 2000, item 20a be corrected to show that he enlisted for 4 years and 00 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065495C070421

    Original file (2001065495C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he has only been paid $4,000 of his authorized $10,000 enlistment bonus. On his DD Form 1966/3 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States), in Section VI (Remarks), it shows that he is authorized an $8,000 high grade enlistment bonus for his college degree and a $2,000 MOS enlistment bonus, for a total enlistment bonus of $10,000. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected for the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060492C070421

    Original file (2001060492C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 14 August 2001 be corrected to reflect his correct rank, all of his prior active service credit and all of his decorations and awards. His DD Form 214 shows his date of rank as an E-2 as 24 October 2000, the date he enlisted. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records at this time to reflect his promotion and date of rank at this time and to adjust his entitlement to severance pay if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052651C070420

    Original file (2001052651C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 3 January 2001 for 5 years and 00 weeks, not 4 years and 00 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 3 January 2001, item 20a be corrected to show he enlisted for 5 years and 00 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086544C070212

    Original file (2003086544C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In November 2000, BAH-I was repaid to the applicant for the period 2 August to 30 November 2000, totaling $4,385.94, causing the applicant to receive a large mid-month and end-of-month (EOM) for November payment totaling $8,292.43 ($5,591.47 + $2,174.54). He was paid for BAH-II from July 21 through 30 November 2000, totaling $3,135.60, leaving him with a debt of $3,831.61 (-$2,174.54 - $4,792 +$3,135.60). The evidence shows that his account should have been closed out on 30 November 2000...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059881C070421

    Original file (2001059881C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She claims that her original promotion was determined to be erroneous by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) based on the fact that she was in a nonpromotable status. Subsequent to being evaluated by the MMRB, on 1 November 1999, the applicant was erroneously promoted to SSG in MOS 31R. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was erroneously promoted to SSG, in MOS 31R, subsequent to the MMRB concluding that she could not perform duties in that MOS based on her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051593C070420

    Original file (2001051593C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he extended his enlistment to 2 years and 26 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 18 October 2000, item 20a be corrected to show he enlisted for 2 years and 26 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052656C070420

    Original file (2001052656C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows she enlisted on 17 January 2001 for 5 years and 00 weeks, not 5 years and 4 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 17 January 2001, item 20a be corrected to show she enlisted for 5 years and 00 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054108C070420

    Original file (2001054108C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/3. The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 9 July 1998 for 3 years and 00 weeks. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3, dated 9 July 1998 item 20a be corrected to show that he enlisted for 3 years and 00 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071796C070403

    Original file (2002071796C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 4/1, dated 14 February 2000, which shows that he enlisted in the pay grade of E-4. His DD Form 4/1 correctly shows that on 14 February 2000, he enlisted in the USAR in the pay grade of E-4, the highest grade he was eligible for.