Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610475C070209
Original file (9610475C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That the separation date on his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed to reflect an end date after his two tours in Vietnam.

APPLICANT STATES:  That his DD Form 214 is incorrect in that it shows a separation date of 23 December 1963.  He contends that he served tours in Vietnam in 1964 and 1965 and that he was separated on 15 December 1965.  A correct DD Form 214 was never issued to him.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1961 for 3 years and was honorably discharged on 23 December 1963.  He served one overseas tour of 1 year, 5 months and 15 days in Okinawa during the period July 1962 and December 1963.  The highest pay grade he held was E-4.

The record reflects that upon his separation from active duty on 23 December 1963, he was transferred to the USAR to complete his military service obligation.  He signed his DD Form 214 upon release from active duty indicating that all information on the document was correct.

On 31 December 1966 he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

The applicant’s records contain no documentation to verify his service in Vietnam either in an active duty status or during his period of reserve service.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  There is no evidence in the record to support his contention that he served two tours in Vietnam, and thus, there is also no basis to change the separation date on his DD Form 214.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019528

    Original file (20130019528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show the: * Meritorious Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC)) * Vietnam Service Medal with 6 bronze service stars * Overseas Service Ribbon (4th Award) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) * Master Aviator (instead of Aviation) Badge * Korea Defense Service Medal 2. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014159

    Original file (20140014159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was authorized the AFEM for his service in the RVN and his records show he was awarded the service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018700

    Original file (20100018700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served two tours of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service stars. The evidence shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020890

    Original file (20090020890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 4 months and 22 days of creditable active military service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. He must also submit documentary evidence such as his DD Form 214, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23 (Army National Guard Retirement Credit Record), DA Form 1380 (Record of Individual Performance or Reserve Duty Training), and/or any other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009506

    Original file (20120009506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his combat service in the Republics of Korea and Vietnam are not documented in his military records. The evidence of record further shows he served in the Republic of Korea, from 16 October 1971 to 15 November 1972; however, this service is not reflected in items 19 or 27 of his last DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 19 of his DD Form 214, for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022332

    Original file (20120022332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training (ADT), Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070005963C071029

    Original file (AR20070005963C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paul M. Smith | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of entry into the Army as 21 January 1963. He was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) with an effective date of 21 January 1965.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000518

    Original file (20080000518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It shows his service in Vietnam from 23 March 1963 through 4 April 1964 and from 22 October 1964 through 12 August 1965. d. A copy of his DD Form 214 for the period from 31 August 1962 through 16 August 1965. e. A copy of a 7 February 2004 letter to a United States Senator soliciting help in obtaining all awards and decorations to which he is entitled and correction of his foreign service. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008612

    Original file (20080008612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Item 32 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not contain an entry which shows that he served in Vietnam. As the applicant served in Vietnam from 8 June 1964 to 3 June 1965, and subsequent editions of Army Regulation 635-5 required that an entry be made on the DD Form 214 to account for service in conflict areas, it would be appropriate at this time to correct item 32 of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212

    Original file (2003090343C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.