Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070005963C071029
Original file (AR20070005963C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        13 September 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070005963


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano          |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deyon D. Battle               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Eric N. Anderson              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Paul M. Smith                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of
entry into the Army as 21 January 1963.

2.  The applicant states that he served his country for 6 years and that
5 1/2 months of his service was on active duty.  He states that he was told
by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Providence, Rhode Island,
that he was not eligible for VA benefits.  He states that he served during
Vietnam and that this error also affects his social security benefits.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of a letter
from the National Personnel Records Center dated 23 August 2006, furnishing
him a copy of his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an
applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations
if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided
in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is
granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are
insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 2 November 1964, the applicant enlisted in the United States Army
Reserve (USAR) in Providence, Rhode Island, for 6 years in the pay grade of

E-1.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) with an
effective date of 21 January 1965.  He went on to successfully complete his
training and he was awarded a supply specialist military occupational
specialty (MOS).

3.  He was released from active duty on 9 July 1965 and he was transferred
to the USAR to complete his Reserve obligation.





4.  The applicant's records show that while he was a member of the USAR, he
was ordered to ACDUTRA on the following dates: 30 July 1966 for 15 days;
17 June 67 for 15 days; 3 August 1968 for 15 days; 2 August 1969 for 15
days; and 1 August 1970 for 15 days.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 1 November 1970
at the expiration of his term of service.  He had completed 6 years of
service as a member of the USAR and he was on ACDUTRA for approximately 8
months and 3 days during his 6-year tour of duty.

6.  A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant had
any service prior to his enlistment in the USAR on 2 November 1964.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the USAR on 2 November
1964 and he has provided no documentation to dispute this information.

2.  His contentions have been noted.  However, there is no evidence in the
available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that
he enlisted in the USAR on 21 January 1963.  His enlistment contract and
every document contained in his Official Military Personnel File pertaining
to his entry date shows that he enlisted in the USAR on 2 November 1964.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the
entry date reflected in his official record is correct.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy this requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the
applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__TAP___  __ENA__  __PMS__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  ____Thomas A. Pagan___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20070005963                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070913                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.  1021 |100.0000/ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS         |
|2.  3                   |100.0200/CHANGE DATE                    |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020890

    Original file (20090020890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 4 months and 22 days of creditable active military service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. He must also submit documentary evidence such as his DD Form 214, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23 (Army National Guard Retirement Credit Record), DA Form 1380 (Record of Individual Performance or Reserve Duty Training), and/or any other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024123

    Original file (20110024123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted a DA Form 20 which shows in: a. item 11 (Enlisted, Inducted, Reenlisted, and/or Ordered to Active Duty) he: (1) enlisted in the ARNG on 21 October 1964 for a period of 6 years; and (2) was ordered to active duty from 24 June to 6 November 1965. b. item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he highlighted Unit Orders Number 1, paragraph 2, issued by the 107th Signal Company (Support), dated 1967, which advanced him to private first class (E-3); and c. item 38 (Record of Assignments)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01092 12

    Original file (01092 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 October 1965, you were convicted by a SPCM of being UA for 113 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000407

    Original file (20150000407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. the FSM was a member of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade and was killed in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 19 November 1967. c. he would like the FSM's DA Form 52-2 (Report of Casualty) corrected by changing the entry stating "Home of Record Middletown, Rhode Island" to read "Home of Record Brunswick, Maine." i. when the traveling Vietnam Wall came to Brunswick and the family went to view it, the FSM's name was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014829

    Original file (20110014829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 5 February 1970 to show he was not on active duty just for training. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was involuntarily ordered to active duty as an enlisted Reservist and served that active duty in Europe. However, his subsequent DD Form 214 incorrectly reports this service as ACDUTRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011761

    Original file (20060011761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 20 October 1969. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 20 October 1969, should be corrected to show he was ordered to active duty rather than ordered to active duty for training. However, the evidence of record shows that this service is not accurately recorded on the applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 20 October 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006362

    Original file (20140006362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as it is recorded on his birth certificate. The applicant's enlistment contract and evidence of record show his place of birth as Pawtucket, RI and birth...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011776

    Original file (20060011776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show specialist four/pay grade E-4. He also requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show he completed 6 months of active duty. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 24a(1) on his DD Form 214 to show he completed 6 months of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509464C070209

    Original file (9509464C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His activation orders, issued by the XX United States Army Corps, specifically state that he was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training (ACDUTRA). Again the orders specifically state the applicant was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training. It is clear, based on the various documents which ordered the applicant to active duty, that his final period of active service, 28 September 1968 through 27 April 1969, was not for the purpose of training but rather...