Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608247C070209
Original file (9608247C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that the effective date of his promotion to pay grade E-5 be corrected.

3.  In support of his application he submits a copy of an order showing he was promoted from pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-5 on 26 April 1991, with a date of rank of 1 February 1991.

4.  The applicant’s records show that he enlisted in the USAR for assignment to a troop program unit on 7 October 1987 in pay grade E-4 with prior active and reserve service.

5.  Army Regulation 140-158, paragraph 1-9, then in effect, which contained the guidelines for correcting the effective date of a promotion, specified that the effective date of a promotion/advancement will be the date of the order or personnel action or a future date.  In those cases where a soldier was entitled to an effective date of promotion or advancement before the date of the order or personnel action, he or she was required to petition this Board for authority to correct the effective date of the promotion or advancement.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to pay grade E-5 with a retroactive date of rank.

2.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to pay grade E-5 effective 26 April 1991.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074792C070403

    Original file (2002074792C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record confirms that the highest rank and pay grade that the applicant was promoted to, held, in which he satisfactorily served while on active duty was SFC/E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011793

    Original file (20090011793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of two Army Achievement Medals and his promotion to pay grade E-4. The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show two awards of the Army Achievement Medal. The evidence of record shows that while serving in the Regular Army the applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 30 December 1992, the highest grade he satisfactorily held during his period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006072

    Original file (20120006072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Army Regulation 15-80, paragraph 2-5 states "one specific act of misconduct may or may not form the basis for a determination that the overall service in that grade was unsatisfactory, regardless of the period of time service in grade." He provided the following documents which indicate he was serving in the rank of SFC/E-7: a. award certificate, dated 30 September 1987, awarding him the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service from 11 August 1987 to 24 August 1987; b. award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005735

    Original file (20110005735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 6 March 1992: * change rank and pay grade to sergeant/pay grade E-5 * change primary military occupational specialty (MOS) to 96B2O (Intelligence Analyst) * add secondary MOS 37F2O (formally 96F) (Psychological Operations Specialist) * add Basic Course Chinese-Mandarin * add Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) 2. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076050C070215

    Original file (2002076050C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 September 1990, the appropriate authority denied the applicant’s appeal. The separation document issued to him on 30 June 1991, the date of his separation, confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of SGT/E-5 on the date of REFRAD. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010745

    Original file (20070010745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Soldiers in the grades of E-5 through E-9 could request to appear before a reduction board. The applicant's record shows he served on active duty for 9 years, 6 months, and 25 days in the rank of SGT with a date of rank of 1 June 1972 when he was discharged from the Regular Army on 8 May 1978. Upon completion of this period of active duty, he was released to the USAR and the DD Form 214 issued on 17 July 1991 shows his rank as specialist/pay grade E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609292C070209

    Original file (9609292C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 9 January 1992 with a date of rank of 29 October 1991, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, table 2-3, rule L. 7. Rule L of table 2-3 states that if an applicant is or has been a member of the Boy Scouts of America and is a recipient of Boy Scout Eagle Certificate Form 58-708 he will be enlisted in pay grade E-2. That rule goes on to say that the soldier will be advised to submit a request to the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507062C070209

    Original file (9507062C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In two applications, adjustment of his effective date and date of rank for promotion to the pay grade E-6 and subsequent promotion to the pay grade of E-7 to be effective on or about 26 May 1991. Likewise, there is no evidence in the available records to show that his promotion to the pay grade of E-6 was unduly delayed. Consequently, there is no basis to adjust his date of rank or effective date of promotion to the pay grade of E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021885

    Original file (20100021885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) to show his rank/grade as private (PV2)/E-2 * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to show his service in Southwest Asia 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Additionally, most personnel documents in his service records show he served as a PVT or PV1/E-1 throughout his military service.