Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011793
Original file (20090011793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  February 26, 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011793 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of two Army Achievement Medals and his promotion to pay grade E-4. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he should have received an Army Achievement Medal for completing 2 years of service and another for remodeling the barracks.  He also states that after completing 2 years of service he should have received an automatic promotion to pay grade E-4.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show two awards of the Army Achievement Medal.  However, there are no orders or other evidence on file in his Official Military Personnel File that confirms award of these personal decorations.  In the absence of authority for these awards, he may request award of the Army Achievement Medals under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code.  The applicant has been notified by separate correspondence of the procedures for applying for these awards under Section 1130 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code.  As a result, the request for award of the Army Achievement Medals will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

3.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program on 5 September 1991.  He enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade 
E-1 on 30 December 1991.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).  He was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 30 December 1992.  This is the highest grade he satisfactorily held during his service.

4.  The applicant was released from active duty in pay grade E-3 on 26 May 1994, at the completion of required active service, and transferred to a Reserve unit.  Entries on his DD Form 214, Items 4a (Grade Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade), show PFC (private first class) and E-3.  

5.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) lists his rank as private, pay grade E-1, effective 30 December 1991. 

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), in effect at the time, prescribed the policies and procedures for the promotion and reduction of enlisted Soldiers.  Paragraph 1-3 specified that a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) would be initiated by the Soldier’s commander to the next higher advancement authority requesting that the Soldier be advanced, with a waiver if applicable.  If the next higher advancement authority approved the request, he or she would so indicate by 1st Endorsement and direct the Soldier’s advancement, indicating the effective date.  The DA Form 4187 and approved endorsement would be filed in the Soldier’s Military Personnel Records Jacket.  Paragraph 2-5 stated promotion to pay grade E-4 required 26-months time in service 
(12 months could be waived) and 4-months time in grade.  There is no automatic promotion/advancement to pay grade E-4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that while serving in the Regular Army the applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 30 December 1992, the highest grade he satisfactorily held during his period of service.  There is no evidence to show he was ever recommended and approved for promotion to pay grade E-4 prior to separation on 26 May 1994.  While he met the time in service requirement, there is no automatic promotion to pay grade E-4.  He must have been recommended by his commander, and the recommendation must have been approved by the next higher advancement authority.  He has provided insufficient evidence to show he was erroneously or unjustly denied promotion to pay grade E-4 during his period of Regular Army service.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011793



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002753

    Original file (20090002753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Commendation Medal; any other awards, decorations, and campaign ribbons he may have earned; and promotion to the next higher grade. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military awards) provides for award of the National Defense Service Medal. With respect to award of the National Defense Service Medal, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was ordered to ADT and entered active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016970

    Original file (20100016970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) he served in Saudi Arabia from 5 January 1991 through 12 May 1991; b. item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) he was awarded or authorized the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, Army Service Ribbon, Army Lapel Button, National Defense Service Medal, and Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006848

    Original file (20090006848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his detachment commander told him that he would be awarded the Good Conduct Medal and either an Army Achievement Medal or an Army Commendation Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to Soldiers who distinguishes himself or herself from among his or her fellow Soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011169

    Original file (20100011169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011169 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a copy of his retirement award recommendation which shows he was recommended for the Meritorious Service Medal; however, the award was downgraded and approved for the Army Commendation Medal. Further, commanders may recommend a Soldier's name be removed from a DA recommended list at any time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018004C070206

    Original file (20050018004C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050018004 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Kuwait Liberation Medal that was awarded by King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, and the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medals he received be added to his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019074

    Original file (20080019074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his records show he did not complete 55D MOS training and was reassigned to Fort Bliss, TX, where he completed training for MOS 14J (Early Warning System Operator). When the commander denies promotion, he or she may promote the Soldier on the next automated Enlisted Advancement Report, provided the Soldier is otherwise qualified. By regulation, he should have been automatically advanced to PV2 six months after his entry on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021246

    Original file (20130021246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show/add: * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * her date of rank (DOR) to SPC of 27 September 2013 * her net active service as 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days vice 3 years, 5 months, and 10 days * the Army Achievement Medal b. correction of her separation orders and discharge certificate to show her rank as SPC. The applicant provides: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011451

    Original file (20110011451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4b (Pay Grade) "E4" * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) all commendations and medals authorized * item 24 (Character of Service) "Honorable" 2. g. Item 13 "Army Service Ribbon//Nothing Follows." His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he completed any other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009321

    Original file (20100009321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service record does not indicate he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty after 11 June 1991. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for issuance of a DD Form 214 to show the following actions which occurred after the period covered his DD Form 214, dated 11 June 1991: * promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 29 June 1992 * 2 years of time in grade which he served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028835

    Original file (20100028835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * A DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the Army Achievement Medal * His Enlisted Record Brief * A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) * Reassignment orders to Korea * Two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) * His DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His personnel record is void of evidence which indicates his promotion was approved by the appropriate authority. He provided a DA Form 4187, dated 1 September 1999, that shows he was recommended for...