Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606242C070209
Original file (9606242C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, the applicant requests that his date of entry on active duty on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed from 8 August 1966 to August 1965.

APPLICANT STATES:  He states that his date of rank of January 1966 shows that he was in the Army prior to the entry date shown on his DD Form 214.  

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for six years on 28 September 1965.

The applicant was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) by the Commander, VIII Corps, on 26 July 1966 with a reporting date to Fort Bliss, Texas of 8 August 1966.  His pay grade on his active duty orders is E-2. 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was ordered to ACDUTRA on 8 August 1966, and was released to his reserve unit of assignment on 9 January 1967 (item 19c) because he had completed training in his military occupational specialty (MOS).  He had 5 months and 2 days of net service during his period of active duty, and 10 months and 10 days of other service.  His DD Form 214 shows his pay grade as 
E-2 with a date of rank of 28 January 1966.

The applicant was discharged from the Army Reserve on 
31 August 1971.  

Army Regulation 635-5, then in effect, prescribes the separation documents furnished each individual who is separated from the Army, including ACDUTRA personnel, and establishes procedures for the preparation of these documents.  Paragraph 4 of that regulation states that a DD Form 214 will be issued at time of separation to each member of the Regular Army and Reserve Components called or ordered to active duty or ACDUTRA for a period of 90 days or more.  Paragraph 42 of that regulation states, in effect, that the date the individual entered on active duty, or for ACDUTRA personnel, the date entered on ACDUTRA, will be entered in item 19c of the DD Form 214.
DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  The applicant was in the Army Reserve on 
28 September 1965, but did not enter on active duty until 
8 August 1966.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 
9 January 1967 includes only the period of time he was on active duty; consequently, the date of entry of 
8 August 1966 on his DD Form 214 is correct.  That time that the applicant served in a Reserve unit prior to his entry on active duty is shown as “Other Service” on his separation document.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002860

    Original file (20080002860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows that the applicant was ordered to active duty for training on 8 July 1966 and he successfully completed all of the necessary training on 23 November 1966. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show 8 July 1966 in Item 19c, date of entry and 23 November 1966 in Item 11d, date of separation on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing 8 July 1966 in Item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007820

    Original file (20140007820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, his Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) unit was activated for about 9 months during the Wilmington Riot of 1968. The applicant's Army military service record shows as a member of the DEARNG he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and entered active duty on 24 October 1966. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509464C070209

    Original file (9509464C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His activation orders, issued by the XX United States Army Corps, specifically state that he was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training (ACDUTRA). Again the orders specifically state the applicant was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training. It is clear, based on the various documents which ordered the applicant to active duty, that his final period of active service, 28 September 1968 through 27 April 1969, was not for the purpose of training but rather...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015025

    Original file (20130015025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17 (Current Active Service Other Than By Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Ordered To Active Duty" vice "Ordered To ACDUTRA [Active Duty For Training]." The regulation stated in: * Item 17 - check appropriate space to indicate means of entry on the current active service; for ACDUTRA personnel, check "other" and enter "Ordered To ACDUTRA" * Item 17b - for ACDUTRA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086597C070212

    Original file (2003086597C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued on this date confirms that he had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 4 days of active military service. Thus, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to correct his record and separation document to show he was wounded in action on 27 May 1965, and was awarded the PH as a result. The Board finds the date of entry listed in Item 19c of the applicant’s 30 December 1966 DD Form 214 is the correct date he reenlisted for that particular period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006953

    Original file (20090006953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Statement of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was held over for 20 days because of the Cuban missile crisis. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries: a. item 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows he completed 6 months of creditable active service during this period; b. item 24a(2) (Other Service) shows he completed 20 days of prior service; c. item 24a(3) (Total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002109C070206

    Original file (20050002109C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that Item 17, of the DD Form 214, states that he was, "Ordered to ACDUTRA (active duty for training) for 18 months and 1 day." He requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he was ordered to active duty for 18 months and 1 day. The applicant was release from active duty for training on 26 September 1965 and was returned to state control as a member of the Oregon Army National Guard to complete his remaining service obligation of 5 years and 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006535

    Original file (20130006535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his DA Form 20 and USAR promotion and discharge orders list his SSN as "xxx-xx-x5xx." These documents are accepted as sufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as "xxx-xx-x5xx." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current SSN entry from the applicant's DD Form 214 and replacing it with the SSN as listed on his social security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017822

    Original file (20080017822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 17a (Current Active Service Other than by Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued on 24 September 1969 be corrected to show that he was ordered to active duty (AD) instead of ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA). The applicant essentially states that his DD Form 214 that was issued on 24 September 1969, which will simply be referred to as his second DD Form 214...