Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002860
Original file (20080002860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  24 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002860 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form  
214) be corrected to reflect the date of entry as 7 July 1966 and effective date of separation as 23 November 1966.

2.  The applicant states that Item 11d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 should be 23 November 1966 and Item 19c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 should be, 7 July 1966.  He states that without a complete DD Form 214 he is unable to apply for benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; Headquarters, XIV United States Army Corps, Letter Orders "USAR" Number 1338, dated 7 July  
1966; Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Reception Station, Letter Orders Number 07-21, dated 12 July 1966; and Department of the Army Certificate of Training for Advanced Individual Training (AIT).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 21 November 1965 and ordered to active duty for training on 8 July 1966.

3.  He completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  

4.  Item 11d, effective date of his DD Form 214, date of discharge, contains no entry.

5.  Item 19c, date of entry of his DD Form 214, also contains no entry.

6.  Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Reception Station, Letter Orders Number 07-21, dated 12 July 1966, shows that the applicant entered active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 8 July 1966.  His Certificate of Training shows that he successfully completed AIT for MOS 
11B1O, Infantry, on 23 November 1966.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it directed that you enter for individuals on ACDUTRA the date of entry on active duty in Item 19c.  This same regulation stated that you enter the date that separation was accomplished in Item 11d.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected, because it does not reflect the date of entry as 7 July 1966 and date of separation as  
23 November 1966.

2.  The evidence shows that the applicant was ordered to active duty for training on 8 July 1966 and he successfully completed all of the necessary training on  
23 November 1966.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show 8 July 1966 in Item 19c, date of entry and 23 November 1966 in Item 11d, date of separation on his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing 8 July 1966 in Item 19c, date of entry and 23 November 1966 in Item 11d, date of separation of his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting the date of entry to 7 July 1966.




       _    ___X____   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002860





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002860



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007820

    Original file (20140007820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, his Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) unit was activated for about 9 months during the Wilmington Riot of 1968. The applicant's Army military service record shows as a member of the DEARNG he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and entered active duty on 24 October 1966. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005143C070205

    Original file (20060005143C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 with an entry date of 29 December 1957 and a separation date of 20 December 1957, which was 9 nine days prior to the date of entry recorded on the DD Form 214. Therefore, the evidence of record suggests that the entry and/or separation date(s) recorded on the DD Form 214 may be in error. Therefore, Item 24, Block a, Line 3, of the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed 2 years, 8 months, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606242C070209

    Original file (9606242C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his date of entry on active duty on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed from 8 August 1966 to August 1965. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was ordered to ACDUTRA on 8 August 1966, and was released to his reserve unit of assignment on 9 January 1967 (item 19c) because he had completed training in his military occupational specialty (MOS). Paragraph 4 of that regulation states that a DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074215C070403

    Original file (2002074215C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he served 6 months of active military service. In this case, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant was ordered to active duty for training for 6 months, and that he entered this period of active duty on 27 June 1962.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015012

    Original file (20080015012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty for training on 29 March 1967 and was honorably released from active duty on 29 July 1967. His DD Form 214 correctly shows the dates of entry and separation and the net period of active service. It appears that the applicant’s periods of service documented on the NA Form 13041 were performed as part of his USAR training obligation and could not be entered on the DD Form 214 as they occurred outside the period covered by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011524

    Original file (20100011524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his dates of service are reversed on his DD Form 214 * the Army Good Conduct Medal and the National Defense Service Medal were never awarded, issued, or placed on his DD Form 214 3. The applicant's separation orders which show he was to be released from active duty on 8 July 1965 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend item 11d of his DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005050

    Original file (20140005050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 5a – PVT (permanent (P)) * item 5b – E-2 * item 6 – 8 May 1967 * item 11a (Type of Transfer or Discharge) – release to the NYARNG * item 11c (Reason and Authority) – Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), Separation Program Number (SPN) 764 (Release of Trainees upon Completion of Military Occupational Specialty Training) * item 11d (Effective Date) – 14 September 1967 * item 17a (Source of Entry) – ordered to ACDUTRA * item 17c...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006953

    Original file (20090006953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Statement of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was held over for 20 days because of the Cuban missile crisis. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries: a. item 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows he completed 6 months of creditable active service during this period; b. item 24a(2) (Other Service) shows he completed 20 days of prior service; c. item 24a(3) (Total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000066C070208

    Original file (20040000066C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests through counsel, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the correct date he entered active duty. Army Regulation 635-5 Personnel Separations), dated 12 June 1956, was the regulation governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 on the date of the applicant’s final separation from active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019613

    Original file (20110019613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * His DOR is 9 September 1966, not 9 September 1967 * He was inducted on 25 or 26 May 1965, not 27 May 1966 * He was separated on 29 April 1969, not 6 April 1968 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed basic combat training (BCT) and advanced individual training (AIT) * He completed the 8-week Wireman course in 1965, not 1966 * Item 25 of his DD Form 214 should show he completed the 8-week Switchboard Course, 2-week Film Projection School, and...