APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his terminated Aviation Career Incentive Pay (ACIP) be reinstated and paid through the anniversary of his 18 year gate.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was an aviator (functional area code 15) when he accepted a position as a Permanent Associate Professor, or PAP, (functional area code 47B) at the United States Military Academy. This led the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) to remove CMF 15 (aviation) as his primary specialty code and terminate his ACIP at an earlier date than required by law. He adds that
COUNSEL CONTENDS:
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000829
The applicant states, in effect, that he suffered a myocardial infarction and became medically unfit for aviation service on 27 July 2003, and that the notification of medical determination and termination of ACIP was made to the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG) on 3 May 2006. g. Applicant's memorandum, dated 10 July 2006, requesting termination of ACIP. On 5 October 2004, by memorandum, the applicant's operations officer notified the unit commander that the applicant's flight pay...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018814
The applicant states that he met the requirements of Army Regulation 600-105 (Aviation Service of Rated Army Officers) for continuous ACIP, which is pay authorized to aviators, regardless of current duty assignment, continuous by each month, who meet the operational flying requirements. d. All commissioned or WO aviators not on extended active duty who maintain PSC 1 and have an aviation specialty of 15, 67J, or MOS 152156, and who are assigned to and performing operational flying duty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011488
The applicant provides: a. (2) An officer qualified for aviation service who has performed at least 72 months of operational flying duty upon completion of 12 years of aviation service is entitled to continuous ACIP for the first 15 years of aviation service. After receiving the results of the 2005 TOFDC audit, the applicant submitted a request for a waiver of the TOFDC requirements based, presumably, on his being forced to accept needs of the service assignments/school attendance which...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 1997-097
How- ever, the Coast Guard does not agree with Applicant’s request as to her ACIP entitlement.” The Chief Counsel stated that, [i]f the Board directs the restoration of Applicant’s designator, the Coast Guard would then evaluate Applicant’s status under COMDTINST 7220.39 to determine what ACIP back pay, if any, is due.” and one-half years of operational flying time. She alleged that the Coast Guard could only remove aeronautical designators pursuant to Article 6.A.1. The applicant also...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006301
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 137th Aviation Regiment Memorandum, subject: Verification of Promotion Eligibility for (applicant), dated 26 September 2008; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 214 AR, dated 19 August 2008; NGB Memorandum, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Warrant Officer of the Army, dated 19 August 2008; DA Form 4186 (Medical Recommendations for Flying Duty), dated 23 July...
On 9 Apr 97, the Board recommended he be considered by an FEB to determine his qualification for aviation service and that the results of the FEB be forwarded to the Commander, AETC, for final determination of his qualification for aviation service. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings, with a corrected directive, is attached at Exhibit C. On 5 Feb 98, a second FEB was convened to consider evidence concerning applicant’s professional qualifications, specifically lack of judgment and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009160C070208
By regulation, members who are qualified for aviation service Army aviators are entitled to receive monthly conditional ACIP only while serving in an operation flying position, and must meet monthly flight minimums to be eligible. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was medically diagnosed with coronary heart disease in October 1998. As a result of this disqualifying medical condition, the applicant’s ACIP was terminated by Department of the Army (DA) incentive pay officials,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013087
The applicant now provides what he claims is new evidence by consolidating flight records and other documents already available to the Board during its original review into a 37-page reconsideration request that also includes MTOE/TDA information the Board suggested he pursue. On 4 April 2008, the applicant requested the support of the Director, Army Aviation Task Force, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G3/5/7 to receive the TOFDC necessary to qualify for his 18-year gate. He further...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00129
Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) is the correct name and acronym to use when referring to what is commonly called “the pilot bonus.” DPAO contends he requested two waiver actions: a waiver for his ADSC and a waiver to the standard separation processing timelines. He further contends he, nor his ANG rating chain, were notified by SAF/PC that his ADSC waiver had been approved, and perhaps most importantly, that recoupment action of the ACP would begin. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00085
After three years, he received orders for a three-year flying assignment to Little Rock AFB. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Feb 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...