Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605222C070209
Original file (9605222C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of her military records by amending her 6 October 1995 reenlistment contract to show that she was entitled to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) in the pay grade of E-6, vice pay grade E-5, as currently reflected and that she be reimbursed the monetary difference. 

3.  On 6 October 1995, while serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 98C at McDill Air Force Base, Florida, the applicant reenlisted in the pay grade of E-5 for a period of 6 years with entitlement to a SRB.

4.  However, on 9 November 1995 the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 with an effective date of 14 September 1995 with a same date of rank.

5.  The Total Army Personnel Command, in a comment to this Board, advised that the applicant had been promoted to the pay grade of E-6 with an effective date of 14 September 1995 (a date prior to her reenlistment) and recommended that her reenlistment contract be corrected and her bonus entitlement recalculated, accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted subsequent to her reenlistment with an effective date of promotion which preceded her date of reenlistment.  This has resulted in an injustice to the applicant by denying her bonus entitlements that she otherwise would have received had she been promoted in a timely manner.

2.  Through no fault of her own, the applicant has been denied a financial gain for which she was otherwise qualified.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 6 October 1995 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to show that she reenlisted in the pay grade of E-6.                

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-056

    Original file (1999-056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AMENDED ORDER The Board’s order correcting the military record of XXXXX, USCG, is hereby amended to read as follows: Her record shall be corrected to show that on December 24, 1998, she reenlisted The extension contracts signed by the applicant on September 30, 1998, and for six years for the purpose of receiving an SRB with a multiple of three under ALDIST 290/98. 1999-056 The applicant, a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on active duty in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct her military record by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608483C070209

    Original file (9608483C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that MOS 54B offered an SRB at the time and that he should be entitled to receive it. The applicant was improperly advised that he could reenlist for Army service school training in MOS 91B, when, by virtue of his promotable status, he was ineligible for such an option. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 4 April 1995 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to reflect that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605622C070209

    Original file (9605622C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 12 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 9 January 1996 for a period of 6 years instead of 4 years. It opined, in effect, that a SRB-1B had been authorized for the applicant’s MOS on 1 January 1996 and had the applicant applied for a waiver to reenlist under his 90-day window, an exception would have been granted. It goes on to state that personnel are not authorized to reenlist outside of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012210

    Original file (20100012210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100012210 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 28 September 2001, the applicant was ordered to active duty for a period of 3 years in an AGR status. The requirement for the applicant to receive the specific SRB granted to her was for her to serve 6 years in the AGR in MOS 68J, not just for reenlisting in MOS 68J.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209

    Original file (9605175C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI “P”).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007830

    Original file (20110007830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, payment of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) guaranteed in her 28 April 2010 DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract). The applicant states: a. she was told that she is not eligible for an SRB because she exceeded the 14 years or less guideline under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) by 2 weeks; b. she was issued a Bonus Control Number (BCN) and a Reenlistment Control Number (RCN); c. she attempted to reenlist in January 2010 and the reenlistment...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-028

    Original file (2002-028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that “if proper counseling was done, [the applicant] would have cancelled the two extensions from her commanding officer 1 According to the SRB regulation, a member must enlist or extend for a minimum of 36 months to receive an SRB. He further stated there is no requirement that the Coast Guard re- counsel its members about a subsequent ALCOAST announcing new SRB multiples. (3), states, in pertinent part, as follows: “Members with exactly 6 years active duty on the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007549

    Original file (20080007549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also provides a memorandum, dated 24 January 2006, subject: Implementation Guidance for Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Army National Guard (ARNG) Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Soldiers; an extract from Title 37, U. S. Code, section 308, with interpretive notes and decisions; a letter, dated 25 October 2005, from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) to a Member of Congress; an email, dated 5 May 2005; her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607255C070209

    Original file (9607255C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records by amending her 30 June 1994 reenlistment contract to show that she reenlisted with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 1A. The applicant states that at the time of her reenlistment on 30 June 1994, she was informed that she was not entitled to receive an SRB. Accordingly, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant’s records to show that she was authorized to receive the SRB-1A that was in effect at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008105

    Original file (20080008105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of her Selected Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). However, there is no evidence that the applicant's reenlistment contract was voided and, as noted above, she continued to serve in AGR until she was notified of medical disqualification. Although, HRC- St. Louis erroneously gave her a Selective Service Reenlistment Bonus Control Number when her primary MOS was not an authorized specialty for entitlement to the bonus, she had the opportunity to exercise the option to...