Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511219C070209
Original file (9511219C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his 9 October 1990 reenlistment be annotated to 30 April 1990.

3.  The applicant states that he now has a break in service because he was not informed that he could reenlist in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  When he received his discharge he immediately contacted the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), discovered that he could reenlist, and reenlisted.  However, his reenlistment still leaves him with a break in service.

4.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the USAR Delayed Entry Program for 6 years on 30 April 1984, giving him an expiration of term of service (ETS) of 29 April 1990.

5.  He entered on active duty in the Regular Army on 18 May 1984, was promoted to pay grade E-5, and was awarded the military occupational specialties of military police and corrections noncommissioned officer.  He was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 5 December 1989 by reason of ETS, holiday early transition program.

6.  On 15 August 1990 the ARPERCEN published orders discharging the applicant from the USAR by reason of ETS.

7.  On 10 October 1990 the applicant reenlisted in the USAR for 4 years.

8.  On 13 October 1992, over 2 years later, the ARPERCEN again discharged the applicant effective 9 October 1990.

9.  On 13 November 1992 the ARPERCEN voided its 15 August 1990 order discharging the applicant.

10.  The contracts, discharges and reenlistments affecting the applicant’s career are summarized as follows:

	- 30 April 1984 enlistment for 6 years (ETS of 29 April 1990).

	- 29 April 1990 the applicant completed his required service and should have been discharged.
	- 15 August 1990 discharge orders were issued due to the applicant’s completion of his required service in April 1990.

	- 10 October 1990 the applicant reenlisted for 4 years.

	- 13 November 1992 discharge orders were issued to affect the applicant’s separation 1 day prior to his 10 October 1990 reenlistment.

	- 13 November 1992 the applicant’s original 15 August 1990 discharge order was voided.

11.  Subsequently, the applicant entered on active duty in the Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) program, was promoted to pay grade E-6, and reenlisted for 6 years on 28 June 1994.

12.  Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 1-30 states that “Provided that there is no evidence of fraud or manifest error and the member receives actual or constructive delivery, orders discharging a soldier from the USAR will not be revoked or the effective date of separation changed after the effective date of the discharge . . .”

13.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the ARPERCEN.  The ARPERCEN confirmed that the applicant’s ETS was 29 April 1990 and had been discharged due to his ETS on 15 August 1990.  That order was voided since a second discharge order dated 13 October 1992 discharged the applicant effective 9 October 1990.  That discharge was based on the applicant’s 10 October 1990 reenlistment in the USAR (that reenlistment is not contained in the applicant’s military records).

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant apparently reenlisted on 10 October 1990, which was after the effective date of his discharge.

2.  As such, the applicant was ineligible to reenlist (versus enlisting as prior service) on 10 October 1990 since he did not have any military status at that time.

3.  The ARPERCEN’s revocation of its 15 August 1990 discharge order was in contravention of Army Regulation 
135-178 since that order was properly published after the effective date of the applicant’s discharge.  

4.  Therefore, the ARPERCEN’s subsequent set of discharge orders (the orders issued on 13 November 1992 effective 9 October 1990) would have no force or effect since the applicant had already been discharged.  Simply stated, the applicant did not have any military status to discharge him from at that time.

5.  Contrary to the applicant’s contention, it was not the ARPERCEN’s responsibility to inform a soldier who has not expressed any interest in retaining military status that he will be discharged at his ETS.  This is especially true for soldiers serving on their initial enlistment such as the applicant.

6.  However, the Board accepts that the applicant had desired to continue his military career in the USAR, and his records now need to be corrected to not only preclude a break in service, but to validate his service subsequent to his 15 August 1990 discharge.  This requires annotating his reenlistment back to the actual date of his ETS and by changing his term of service to coincide with his 28 June 1994 reenlistment.

7.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by showing that the applicant reenlisted for 4 years and 2 months on 29 April 1990 in pay grade E-5.

	b.  by revoking, rescinding, or voiding the discharge orders published on 15 August 1990 and 13 November 1992; and

	c.  by revoking, rescinding, or voiding the applicant’s 10 October 1992 reenlistment contract.
BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609813C070209

    Original file (9609813C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, there is a letter from the ARPERCEN dated 22 July 1993 informing the applicant that he could not be transferred to the USAR because discharge orders had already been published. However, it appears that the applicant was either not informed that he was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve or that he had to submit a request to be transferred to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009301

    Original file (20090009301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that his request for a medical waiver was disapproved and that he had remained in the Retired Reserve, thereby being eligible for retirement benefits. The applicant requested a waiver of his medical disqualification so that he could complete 20 years of qualifying service for a non-regular retirement. The law granting an early retirement based on completion of 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059198C070421

    Original file (2001059198C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. This office opined that the discharge orders issued were valid and in accordance with Army regulations; however, recommended that authority should be given to void the discharge orders and allow the applicant to transfer to the Retired Reserve as he desires. As stated in the advisory opinion, he requests that authority be given to void the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070079C070402

    Original file (2002070079C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 17 March 1992 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 4 January 1992, the date his Retired Identification Card was issued. RECOMMENDATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097442C070212

    Original file (03097442C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that his record be corrected to show that he reenlisted in the Army Reserve on 5 August 1995 in order for him to maintain his Reserve affiliation and continue to receive VSI (voluntary separation incentive) payments. The applicant provides a copy of his last available DD Form 4/1-E (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and a copy of an order discharging him from the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609922C070209

    Original file (9609922C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states, in effect, that he was not given the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, it appears that the applicant was either not informed that he was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve or that he had to submit a request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004504C070206

    Original file (20050004504C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he retired on 21 April 1993 and was assigned to the US Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group, by Orders Number 24-9, published by Headquarters (Hqs), 108th Division (Training [tng]), dated 25 March 1993. The evidence shows that orders were later published releasing the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and he was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 15 December 1995. Based on the evidence provided, it would be equitable and just to correct the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212

    Original file (2003085863C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010366C070206

    Original file (20050010366C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Randolph Fleming | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 14 November 2003 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009163

    Original file (20090009163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. He states that paragraph 3 of the ABCMR’s decision states that his records contain ARPERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, that erroneously show he was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 January 2002 and that it...