Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03881
Original file (PD-2014-03881.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-03881
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 201
50120
SEPARATION DATE: 20070925


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Health Care Specialist) medically separated for bilateral shin splints. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) although he was authorized to perform alternate physical fitness testing. He was issued a permanent L1/U2 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral medial tibial stress syndrome” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated bilateral medial tibial stress syndrome” as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: Please consider all conditions.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20070725
VA
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome 5099-5022 10% No VA Disability Claim Filed
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
RATING: 10%
RATING: None


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome. The CI developed bilateral medial lower leg pain, aggravated with running in mid-2006 (no history of direct trauma). Subsequent X-rays and bone scan were normal. With progressive painful symptoms, orthopedics specifically identified bilateral shin splints with associated overuse tendonitis. Despite treatment to include medication, altered activities, and physical therapy, his painful symptoms remained with increased activity and or prolonged standing. His conservative treatment continued and he was referred to an MEB. His limitations included no running or road marching and the commander’s statement corroborated such limitations. At his MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) (performed 3 months prior to separation); he reported the correlation of bilateral leg symptoms with aggressive activity. His physical examination was detailed and revealed bilateral tibia tenderness with corresponding edema. The knees had normal range-of-motion (ROM) without instability. The examiner diagnosed bilateral medial tibial stress syndrome and listed the condition as stable. There was no VA Compensation & Pension filing that was accomplished at the time of this Board’s review; and, therefore any impairment rating recommendation will be based upon the MEB exam and terminal encounter documents within the service treatment record (STR).

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB chose to bundle the lower extremities and assign an analogous rating of 10% with 5022 code (periostitis) which defaults to the 5003 code (arthritis, degenerative) based on residual tenderness without loss of joint motion. The Board first considered whether each leg condition remained separately unfitting, having decoupled them from the combined PEB adjudication. The objective clinical STR evidence remained equivocal to both lower extremities without indication of one leg more impaired than the other. The preponderance of clinical evidence throughout the documented exams overwhelmingly described adverse findings as bilateral with rare identification of right or left involvement. Board members agreed that the clinical evidence as presented in this case would involve a high degree of speculation to conclude that the disability either separately confined to one leg or a combination of both legs (PEB’s rating) would have rendered the CI incapable of performing his military duties and therefore, making him unfit for continued military service. Board members agreed to invoke VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and concede in favor of the CI that the frequent equivalent bilateral findings in this case rose to the level that each leg, as an isolated condition, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS; and, accordingly recommends separate ratings for the right and left legs.

Although the NARSUM indicated normal ROM about the lower extremities without comment in reference to painful motion, Board members considered a rating of the tibial condition conceding VASRD §4.40 (functional loss) noting (a part which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously disabled”), based upon the CI’s reported complaints of painful symptoms upon running or increased activity. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3, the Board recommends separate right and left disability ratings of 10% each for the bilateral leg condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral medial tibial stress condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends separate disability ratings of 10% each leg, coded 5099-5022. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.




RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome; Right Leg 5099-5022 10%
Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome; Left Leg 5099-5022 10%
COMBINED (w/ BLF) 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 2014
0814, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150011215 (PD201403881)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00176

    Original file (PD-2013-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service IPEB – Dated 20021122VA - Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Recurrent Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (Shin Splints)5022-500310%Recurrent Bilateral Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome5022-52620%*Service Treatment Record(STR)Chronic Shin SplintsCategory IIGERDCategory IIIDuodenal Ulcer Disease73050%STRRecurrent UrolithiasisCategory IIIUrolithiasis75080%STRNo Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 1STR Combined: 10%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01355

    Original file (PD-2013-01355.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : ServiceIPEB – Dated 20040107VA* -based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Lower Extremity Stress Fractures/Reaction50220%Left Tibial Stress Fractures5299-526010%STRRight Tibial Stress Fractures5299-526010%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 Combined: 0%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040210 (most proximate to the date of separation (DOS)) Bilateral Stress Fractures . When the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01099

    Original file (PD-2014-01099.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Lower Leg Pains… 5099-50220%Chronic Shin Splints, Right Lower Extremity 5299-52620%20070308Chronic Shin Splints, Left Lower Extremity5299-52620%20070308Adjustment Disorder with Anxious MoodNot UnfittingAdjustment Disorder with Anxious Mood (also Claimed as Anxiety)9435-944030%20070531Personality DisorderNot UnfittingNo Diagnosis20070531Vocal Cord DyskinesiaNot UnfittingVocal Cord Dysfunction -...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02015

    Original file (PD-2014-02015.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Lower Extremity Stress Reaction w/o Evidence of Fractures5099-50220%Medial Stress Syndrome Tibial Shaft…Right Side52620%20140319Medial Stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02037

    Original file (PD-2013-02037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040617VA* -(5 days Post-Separation)Condition CodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExamBilateral Shin Splints50220%Delayed Union/Nonunion, Stress Fracture, Left Tibial Shaft5299-526210%20040816Shin Splints, Right Leg5299-5262NSC20040816Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 6 RATING: 0%COMBINED RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050609(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). However, the option of not recommending separate disability ratings,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00815

    Original file (PD2011-00815.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was separated without surgery having been performed on the left leg. In the matter of the medial tibial stress syndrome, bilateral legs, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends a combined rating of 10%, coded 5022-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01524

    Original file (PD-2012-01524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20020722 VA – All Effective Date 20030829 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Bilateral Chronic Shin Splints 5022 0% Chronic Shin Splints, Left Leg 5299-5262 10% STR* Chronic Shin Splints, Right Leg 5299-5262 0% STR* Combined: 0% Combined: 10% *No C&P examination completed ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System (DES) fitness determinations and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01224

    Original file (PD-2013-01224.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01532

    Original file (PD-2012-01532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If he known he had caught something in the shower he would’ve filed for it at [the] time.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for...