Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00176
Original file (PD-2013-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE : PD -20 13 - 00 176
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0227
Separation Date: 20030215


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve AOC ( PO2)/E-5 (AOC/PO2 / Aviation Officer Candidate /Petty Officer 2nd Class) medically separated for a bilateral leg (shin splint ) condition. The CI experienced bilateral shin pain while training in Officer Candidate School. He was diagnosed with s hin splints , was treated conservatively, and returned to training 4 months later . After another 7 months of training , his bilateral leg pain returned and the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his training . He was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral leg/shin pain condition, characterized as “shin splints (tibial periostitis)” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated “recurrent medial tibial stress syndrome (shin splints)” as unfitting, rated 10%. The PEB also adjudicated “shin splints (tibial periostitis) chronic” as Category II , a condition which contributes to the unfitting condi ti on and “ gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) ” and “recurrent urolithiasis” as Category III , conditions that are not separately unfitting and do not contribute to the unfitting condition. The CI made no appeals and was medically.


CI CONTENTION : The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e . ( 2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting r ecurrent m edial t ibial s tress s yndrome ( s hin s plints) condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20021122
 VA - Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Recurrent Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (Shin Splints) 5022-5003 10% Recurrent Bilateral Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome 5022-5262 0%* Service Treatment Record (STR)
Chronic Shin Splints Category II
GERD Category III Duodenal Ulcer Disease 7305 0% STR
Recurrent Urolithiasis Category III Urolithiasis 7508 0% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 1 STR
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20030616 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
* VARD dated 20040331 coded each leg 5022-5312 and rated 10% for each effective the day after separation, 20030216


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The PEB coded the r ecurrent m edial t ibial s tress s yndrome ( s hin s plints) condition under the single analogous code of 50 22 , p eriostitis with 5003 , degenerative a rthritis. This coding approach is countenanced by AR 635-40 (B.24 f.), but IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must apply only VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities ( VASRD ) guidance to its recommendation. The Board must therefore apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each joint are achieved IAW VASRD §4.71a. If the Board judges that two or more separate ratings are warranted in such cases ; however, it must satisfy the requirement that each “unbundled” condit ion was reasonably justified as unfitting in and of itself, with the caveat that the final recommendation may not produce a lower combined rating as that of the PEB.

Recurrent Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (Shin Splints ) Condition . According to the MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) a ddendum, t he CI reported bilateral shin splints on 5 April 2001. He was seen for pain in the left anterior tibia with physical exam findings of tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the mid left tibia. The examiner diagnosed mild shin splints and recommended a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug Motrin. The o rthopedist documented bilateral leg pain right greater than left; exacerbated by running or walking with significant burning after a half mile and with ambulation on pavement. The examiner diagnosed bilateral shin splints. The CI was also evaluated by physical therapy who diagnosed shin splints . The CI continued with chronic shin splints despite rest. He was seen in m edical c linic with worsening of shin splints with right anterior tibial pain with bruising and left tibial-fibula pain with bruising, mild swelling right tibia greater than left tibia. The physical exam findings were right tibia-fibula significant TTP anteriorly, midline bone with bruising and swelling; left tibia-fibula TTP midline bone with bruising. The b one s can demonstrated very slight diffusely increased uptake in the proximal two- thirds of the shaft of the right tibia and fibula consistent with shin splints. The o rthopedics c onsultation indicated that the CI had pain in the anterior aspects of his legs after approximately a half mile on pavement; however, he also had pain at rest with palpation or stretching. The physical exam findings were bilateral leg TTP along the anterior crest of the tibia. The o rthopedist diagnosed bilateral shin splints. The p odiatrist noted physical exam findings of mildly tender medial border of the bilateral distal tibia. The MEB NARSUM exam approximately 5 months prior to separation noted that the CI was on restricted duty since April due to bilateral leg pain and he had been unable to run for 6 months. The physical exam findings were full range - of - motion in both knees without instability; localized tenderness in the pretibial cortex of the right and left tibias with pain. A n MEB a ddendum documented recurrent medial tibial stress syndrome . The non-medical assessment indicated that at the time of this assessment, the CI still experienced pain in his lower legs while running, jumping or walking extensively. The opinion rendered was that the bilateral leg condition was incompatible with a Navy career. The CI accomplished a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 11 months after separation. That C&P exam was not available for review however, the VARD dated 31   March 2004 referred to that exam and granted the CI separate analogous codes of 5022-5312, Group XII muscle injury, for each and granted a “moderate , ” 10%, rating for each leg effective the day after separation .

As noted above, there were no unilateral distinctions with regards to clinical features or fitness considerations. The commander’s statement did not distinguish between the right and left shins as negatively impacting duty performance. Therefore, it is reasonable to surmise that it was the overall effect of both lower legs which rendered the CI unfit as determined by the PEB. It is further noted that a §4.71a basis for individual rating is questionable, given the lack of compensable physical exam findings or differentiation between the shins in the service treatment records. The bilateral shin pain condition was most compatible with VASRD code 5022 as applied by the PEB. Evaluating VASRD §4.40 (functional loss) criteria to achieve separately compensable rating s is also quite speculative, since there was no functional loss evidence attributable to a single leg . Board members agree that there were insufficient grounds for recommending separate right and left leg disability ratings at the time of separation in this case. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the r ecurrent m edial t ibial s tress s yndrome ( s hin s plints) condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the r ecurrent m edial t ibial s tress s yndrome ( s hin s plints) condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Recurrent Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (Shin Splints) 5022-5003 1 0%
COMBINED 1 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 120410 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




                          




MEMOR A N DUM FOR DIRECTOR , SECR E TARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
 S ubj: PHYSI C AL DI S ABIL I TY BOARD OF REVIEW ( PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040 . 44
(b)      CORB ltr dtd 8 Aug 14

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b) , and, for the reasons provided in their respective forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy's Physical Evaluation Bo ard:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USMC, XXX XX XXXX
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USMC, XXX XX XXXX
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USMC, XXX XX XXXX
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former U SN, XXX XX XXXX
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former U SM C, XXX XX XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 Assistant General Counsel (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01005

    Original file (PD2012 01005.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service IPEB – Dated 20020313VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Leg Pain due to Recurrent Tibial Stress Fractures5099-50030%Tibial Stress Fracture, Left Leg5299-50100%Service Treatment Record (STR)Tibial Stress Fracture, Right Leg5299-50100%STR Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050105 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board must therefore apply separate codes and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01524

    Original file (PD-2012-01524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20020722 VA – All Effective Date 20030829 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Bilateral Chronic Shin Splints 5022 0% Chronic Shin Splints, Left Leg 5299-5262 10% STR* Chronic Shin Splints, Right Leg 5299-5262 0% STR* Combined: 0% Combined: 10% *No C&P examination completed ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System (DES) fitness determinations and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02037

    Original file (PD-2013-02037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040617VA* -(5 days Post-Separation)Condition CodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExamBilateral Shin Splints50220%Delayed Union/Nonunion, Stress Fracture, Left Tibial Shaft5299-526210%20040816Shin Splints, Right Leg5299-5262NSC20040816Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 6 RATING: 0%COMBINED RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050609(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). However, the option of not recommending separate disability ratings,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03881

    Original file (PD-2014-03881.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner diagnosed bilateral medial tibial stress syndrome and listed the condition as “stable.”There was no VA Compensation & Pension filing that was accomplished at the time of this Board’s review; and,therefore any impairment rating recommendation will be based upon the MEB exam and terminal encounter documents within the service treatment record (STR). Board members agreed that the clinical evidence as presented in this case would involve a high degree of speculation to conclude...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01090

    Original file (PD-2014-01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “bilateral medial tibial stress fracture” as unfitting, rated 20%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). invalid font number 31502 SAF/MRB 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Section 1554, 10 USC), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01090.After careful consideration of your application and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02669

    Original file (PD-2014-02669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Leg Pain…Tibial Stress Fractures5099-500310%Right Tibial Stress Fracture with Ankle Strain5299-526210%20051117Left Tibial Stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00867

    Original file (PD-2014-00867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)Condition CodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExamBilateral Shin Splints (10% rating for each leg)…5299-526220%Right Anterior Tibialis Tendonitis52620%*20080922Left Anterior Tibialis Tendonitis52620%*20080922Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 20% Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090224 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) *VARD dated 20090805 increased the left and right anterior tibial tendonitis to 10% each effective 20081119. The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00492

    Original file (PD2011-00492.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Bilateral Lower Leg Condition. Service Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02762

    Original file (PD-2013-02762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These were considered together as right and left lower leg conditions for determination of fitness. The Board agreed the left hip condition was mild.The records noted periods of both hip pain and no hip pain.Routine X-rays, bone scans of the hips revealed no pathology. The Board noted the report of the CI at the time of the NARSUM thatleft hip pain “radiated from the back.”After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, the Board agreed that there was no preponderance of evidence...