Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03428
Original file (PD-2014-03428.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-03428
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150522
SEPARATION DATE: 20090629


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Combat Engineer) medically separated for bilateral ankle pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) nor satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral ankle pain condition characterized as “chronic right ankle pain status post trimalleolar fracture with dislocation of ankle requiring open reduction and internal fixation” and “chronic left ankle pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Additionally, “chronic bilateral eczema of the feet” was also forwarded for adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral ankle pain,” as unfitting, rated 10% each for a combined 20% rating, with citied application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining eczema condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please review all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20090323
 VA* - (~1 Mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Ankle Pain 5099-5003 20%** Residuals of Right Ankle Fracture with Traumatic Arthritis 5271 20% 20090803
Left Ankle Strain 5271 10% 20090803
Chronic Bilateral Eczema of the Feet Not Unfitting Eczematous Dermatitis of Both Feet 7806 0% 20090803
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 0
COMBINED RATING: 20%
 COMBINED RATING: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90904 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) . * * PEB r ated each ankle separately at 10% for a combined 20% rating.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Ankle Pain Condition. Although the PEB titled the condition as “bilateral ankle pain,” on the DD Form 199 revealed that the 20% rating was actually the combined separate ratings of 10% for each ankle to include the bilateral factor. The historical parameters of each ankle are presented separately below.

Right Ankle Condition. On 15 June 2006, the CI severely fractured and dislocated his right ankle while playing basketball. He underwent surgical reconstruction as well as aggressive physical therapy (PT). Post-operatively he did very well, but over time residual pain kept him from performing his MOS duties. On 6 November 2008 (7 months prior to separation), the CI endorsed constant 5/10 and up to 9/10 pain with running, standing or walking for long periods of time, or with weight-bearing activities. He was permanently profiled in February 2009 and referred to an MEB. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination on 2 March 2009 (4 months prior to separation), the CI’s chief complaint was “My ankles hurt.” His physical examination (PE) revealed decreased and painful right ankle motion with surrounding tenderness. The examiner opined that the CI’s condition was stable at a level as to not allow him to fulfil his military duties and that his prognosis was “fair to good.” At the VA Compensation and Pension examination on 3 August 2009 (just over a month after separation), the CI reported daily right ankle pain with flare-ups two to three times per week lasting for several hours. His PE revealed right ankle swelling and decreased painful motion. His diagnosis remained right ankle fracture with surgical correction and traumatic arthritis. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Ankle ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1 Mo. Post-Sep
Left Right Left Right
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 20 12 20 10
Plantar Flexion (45) 40 28 30 20
Comment tenderness painful motion painful motion painful motion
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%-20% 10% 10%-20%

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the service and the VA utilized different primary coding options of 5003 (degenerative arthritis) and 5271 (ankle; limited motion) with the sole rating of 10% for each ankle respectively. Board members acknowledged the significant limitation of motion about the right ankle and deliberated over the degree of impairment as either “moderate” at 10% or “marked” at 20% under code 5271. Members deliberated extensively and agreed that the evidence of approximately 50% loss of ankle motion coupled with persistent pain would properly be defined as “marked” in support of a 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the right ankle condition.

Left Ankle Condition. Other than MEB and disability summary records, there were only three encounter documents in the case file pertaining to the left foot; an emergency room record dated 2 March 2008 for left ankle/foot pain and swelling, a follow-up clinic visit on 3 March 2008, and an X-ray report indicating a “normal” left ankle dated 20 January 2009. There was no history of trauma to the left ankle or foot. At both the NARSUM and VA examinations, the cause of the left ankle pain was noted to most likely be secondary to increased weight bearing in compensating for the primary right ankle injury. Both examinations revealed minimal limitation of motion and either tenderness and or painful motion all in support of a maximum rating of 10% impairment IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) or §4.40 (functional loss) as indicated by tenderness. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition.

Contended PEB Condition. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the chronic bilateral eczema of the feet was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations requires a preponderance of evidence, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The eczema condition was not profiled or implicated in the commander’s statement and was not judged to fail retention standards. The condition was reviewed and considered by the Board. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that this condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation, and in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the bilateral eczema of the feet and so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right ankle condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5271 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the left ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended chronic bilateral eczema of the feet, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be re-characterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Ankle Fracture 5271 20%
Left Ankle Pain 5271 10%
COMBINED (w/BLF) 30%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140425, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President       
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150015742 (PD201403428)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 30% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 30% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.



3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01340

    Original file (PD2012 01340.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other x 120030827 Combined: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040308(most proximate to date of separation)**No change to ratings derived from subsequent C&P exams ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined bilateral foot and ankle pain as the single unfitting and solely rated condition, coded 5022. Members agreed that the bilateral ankle pain condition was not reasonably justified as separately unfitting and it cannot be recommended for a separate disability rating.After due...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01652

    Original file (PD-2013-01652.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “bilateral ankle pain and instability post Brostrom reconstruction” and “chronic foot pain due to plantar fasciitis” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB found the referred left knee condition as not unfitting. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Foot Pain due to Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Cavus5299-502010%20040205Right Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00184

    Original file (PD-2014-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Thighs, Ankles, and Feet5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Chronic Left Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Bilateral Pes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02704

    Original file (PD-2013-02704.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Stress Fractures, Both Heels5099-500310%Residuals, Stress Fracture, Left Heel528410%20061108Residuals, Stress Fracture, Right Heel528410%20061108No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 1 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070129 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.59...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02629

    Original file (PD-2013-02629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Ankle Pain5099-500310%Stress Reaction Right Ankle52710%*20040804Stress Reaction Left Ankle52720%*20040804Other x0 (Not in Scope)Other x2 Rating: 10%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050114 (most proximate to date of separation)VARD dated 20060913 increased rating to 10% for each ankle effective 20060623 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The FPEB diagnosed the combined the bilateral ankle pain as a single unfitting...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 00417

    Original file (PD 2011 00417.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Non tender, but pain with use §4.71a Rating 20 % (5271) 20 % (5271) 10 % (5271) 10 % (5271)The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral ankle pain secondary to bilateral avascular necrosis of the talus and pes planus with application of VASRD § 4.14, avoidance of pyramiding as a single unfitting condition and assigned a disability rating of 20%, analogous to degenerative joint disease. The Board determined that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01998

    Original file (PD-2013-01998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain medication required.” *VARD dated 25 July 2008 rated Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, right ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, left ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and retained a 30% rating using code 5299-5276 for bilateral pes planus and plantar fasciitis (previously evaluated as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction bilaterally, plantar fasciitis bilaterally) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s information...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00854

    Original file (PD 2012 00854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200854 SEPARATION DATE: 20030102 BOARD DATE: 20130213 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Reserve component First Lieutenant / O-1 (91A 5P/General Ordnance Officer), medically separated for chronic bilateral knee, ankle and hip pain (rated as a single unfitting condition). ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00292

    Original file (PD2011-00292.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Ankle Pain Condition . At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation obtained three months before separation, the CI reported chronic pain in both ankles, right greater than left with pain progressing from 1/10 to 5/10 with activity throughout the day. In the matter of the bilateral ankle pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends that the right and left ankle conditions each be separately adjudicated.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00394

    Original file (PD2012-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment PT ~7 Mo. Symptoms included ankle popping (predominately right); shin pain knees pop and can swell; with “knees and ankles are stiff and weak and his legs can give out.” The examiner stated “He has generalized and multiple symptoms regarding the lower extremities and it is difficult to sort them out specifically on taking the history.” The examiner indicated there was no foot condition; there was bilateral shin pain and right...