Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01981
Original file (PD-2014-01981.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01981
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS  BOARD DATE: 20141231
SEPARATION DATE: 20030315


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Fire Support) medically separated for heat related injuries with subsequent cardiovascular instability. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “heat related injuries with subsequent cardiovascular instability” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “heat related injuries with subsequent cardiovascular instability)” as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions. Also, heat related illness, knee and back.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20020115
 VA* - (~13 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Heat Related Injuries w/Subsequent Cardiovascular Instability 7999-7900 10% Status Post Heat Exhaustion 8999-8911 0% 20020204
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 11
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 0%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 100923 ( original VARD not in record) .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Heat Related Injuries. The service treatment record contained few, but detailed documents with regard to the heat injury. The CI experienced multiple heat-related physical symptoms to include syncope (passing out) during the period of 1999 and the summer of 2000. His symptoms were lightheadedness, dizziness, weakness and nausea. There were no reported persistent altered mental changes or active seizure activity. Occasionally, he was treated in the emergency room without overnight stay. Intermittent tachycardia was present with heat-related diagnoses. All abnormal vital signs or laboratory values were normalized either before release from the medical facility or upon follow-up evaluation. Extensive laboratory metabolic work-up and tilt-table (blood pressure response) testing revealed no pathologic heat-related or cardiovascular residuals. He was referred for an MEB in January 2001. The narrative summary examination performed on 25 July 2001 (8 months prior to separation) was a historical recap of his condition without new or present complaints. The physical examination (PE) was normal. His pulse was normal at 66 beats per minute and his pulse pressure also normal at 54 (normal range = 40-60). At the VA Compensation and Pension examination, performed 6 weeks prior to separation, the CI reported continued pre-syncope symptoms with full body cramps when he “fully exerts himself” in hot environments. The PE was normal including vital signs and blood pressure parameters. His diagnosis was heat exhaustion on multiple occasions without residuals.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition at 10%, coded 7999-7900 (analogous to hyperthyroidism). The VA rated the condition at 0% coded 8999-8911 (analogous to epilepsy). There is not a specific VASRD code for such a heat-related injury and, the PEB’s 7900 thyroid code is often analogized for such conditions. Board members considered that in the absence of abnormal functional residuals or significant impact on occupational and social activity, the heat-related condition was of mild severity. Board members also agreed that the analogized VASRD 7900 code most accurately depicted the CI’s condition and that the PEB’s 10% rating was supported IAW VASRD §4.119 for intermittent tachycardia and associated full-body cramping. The Board was unable to find any pathway to a higher rating than the PEB’s 10%. Code 7900 at 30% criteria is not applicable in this case having retained a normal pulse pressure. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the recurrent heat injury condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the heat-related condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140509, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
 (b) CORB ltr dtd 18 May 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:

- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC



                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                          Assistant General Counsel
                           (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
                                                     

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01953

    Original file (PD-2013-01953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEBadjudicated “recurrent heat exhaustion” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01507

    Original file (PD2012 01507.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Five days after the initial injury, the CI suffered another episode of heat exhaustion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010217 (PD201201507)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03407

    Original file (PD-2014-03407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The InformalPEBadjudicated “recurrent episodes of heat exhaustion/heat intolerance” including atypical chest pain in its disability descriptionas unfitting, rated 10%,with application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the recurrent episodes of heat exhaustion and heat intolerance...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02745

    Original file (PD-2013-02745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left knee X-rayson 21 February 2007 were normal.At the MEB examination on 9 March 2007, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant knee pain. Notes in the STR indicated the CI was advised the right knee pain was due to compensation for the left knee injury. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01053

    Original file (PD-2014-01053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Heat Intolerance7999-790010%Residuals of Heat Stroke8199-810010%20040224Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01968

    Original file (PD-2013-01968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Heat Exhaustion, Recurrent7999-79000%Heat Stroke8099-8019NSC20051107Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 620051107 Rating: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060418 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Other Contended Condition .The CI’s application asserts that a compensable rating should be considered for the asthma condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01307

    Original file (PD2013 01307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board discussed separate left and right plantar fasciitis conditions and determined that in light of the specific entry noting the inability to wear military footwear for prolonged periods of time would indeed create a situation of not meeting service retention standards even with either foot (alone) having the described plantar fasciitis condition. The Board next considered if a VASRD-compliant bilateral code was applicable, or if the unfitting left foot and unfitting right foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01725

    Original file (PD-2012-01725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Heatstroke 7999-7900 10% Heat Exhaustion 8999-8911 NSC 20020729 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Nephrolithiasis 7508 0 20020729 Combined: 10% Combined: 0% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020807 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Heatstroke Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00632

    Original file (PD2011-00632.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the exertional heat illness condition as unfitting, rated 0% and referencing the Army table of analogous codes; which are in turn rated under criteria from the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). No other conditions were service connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12 months of separation or contended by the CI. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02026

    Original file (PD-2014-02026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the VA Compensation and Pension examination(performed 11 months after separation), the CI reported during the acute heat injury he was hydrated and he had some heat intolerance; otherwise, he has no functional impairment, no residuals from heat exhaustion since 2004. The PEB adjudicated the recurrent heat intolerance and injury condition by applying the analogous VASRD code of 7999-7900 (hyperthyroidism)and rating it 0%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no...