Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01953
Original file (PD-2013-01953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-01953
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141003
SEPARATION DATE: 20050107


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reservist SPC/E-4 (31B/Military Police Officer) medically separated for recurrent heat exhaustion. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty but could perform an alternate physical fitness test. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition, characterized as “recurrent episodes of heat exhaustion,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “recurrent heat exhaustion” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I am still suffering from the condition which impairs my performance.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting heat exhaustion condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20041115
 *VA - (No Show for C&P Exam)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Recurrent Heat Exhaustion 7999-7900 0% Recurrent Heat Exhaustion 8999-8911 NSC
Other x 0 (In Scope)
 Other x 0
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 51108 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Recurrent Heat Exhaustion Condition. The service treatment record contained few, but detailed documents with regard to his heat injury. The CI was activated twice for deployment; once in 2002 and again in 2004. With each deployment, he experienced a single (heat related) physical collapse while performing a long distance run as part of physical fitness training. His symptoms were lightheadedness, dizziness, weakness, and nausea. There was no loss of consciousness or reported altered mental changes or seizure activity. He was treated in the emergency room for each episode without overnight stay. All abnormal vital signs or laboratory values were normalized either before release from the medical facility or upon follow-up evaluation. He developed no medical complications from these episodes and was placed on a P3 profile secondary to a recurrent heat-related condition and referred for an MEB in 2004. At the narrative summary examination, performed on 8 July 2004, (6 months prior to separation) the CI’s chief complaint was, “recurrent exertional heat injuries.” The CI reported no new or current symptoms. The physical examination was normal. He was not tachycardic (fast heartbeat) and his pulse pressure was slightly elevated at 64 (normal range = 40-60). The CI failed to report for his VA Compensation and Pension examination which was scheduled for 24 June 2005.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 0%, coded 7999-7900, analogous to hyperthyroidism. The VA rated the condition as not service-connected (appointment no show), coded 8999-8911 analogous to epilepsy. There is not a specific VASRD code for such a heat-related injury; and, the PEB’s 7900 thyroid code is often analogized for such conditions. Board members considered that in the absence of abnormal functional residuals or significant impact on occupational and social activity, the heat-related condition was of mild severity. Board members agreed that the analogized VASRD 7900 code most accurately depicted the CI’s condition. The Board is unable to find any pathway to a higher rating than the PEB’s 0%. Code 7900 at 10% criteria is not applicable in this case having the absence of tachycardia or the requirement for continuous medication. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the recurrent heat injury condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the recurrent heat injury condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 2013, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150003246 (PD201301953)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02026

    Original file (PD-2014-02026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the VA Compensation and Pension examination(performed 11 months after separation), the CI reported during the acute heat injury he was hydrated and he had some heat intolerance; otherwise, he has no functional impairment, no residuals from heat exhaustion since 2004. The PEB adjudicated the recurrent heat intolerance and injury condition by applying the analogous VASRD code of 7999-7900 (hyperthyroidism)and rating it 0%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00948

    Original file (PD2012-00948.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the history of heat stroke condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In the matter of the heat condition and IAW VASRD §4.12a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01725

    Original file (PD-2012-01725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Heatstroke 7999-7900 10% Heat Exhaustion 8999-8911 NSC 20020729 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Nephrolithiasis 7508 0 20020729 Combined: 10% Combined: 0% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020807 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Heatstroke Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01981

    Original file (PD-2014-01981.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PE was normal including vital signs and blood pressure parameters. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00896

    Original file (PD2011-00896.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the heat stroke with rhabdomyolysis as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. CI CONTENTION : “I got discharged from the U. S. Army due to a Heat Stroke and Rhabdomyolysis. Please review copies of my Army medical records.” In Item #14 (continuation of VA Rating Information), the CI stated: “The Department of Veterans Affairs denied me a rating (0%)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01507

    Original file (PD2012 01507.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Five days after the initial injury, the CI suffered another episode of heat exhaustion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010217 (PD201201507)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00035

    Original file (PD2010-00035.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ER evaluation revealed heat injury, acute renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis and he was admitted to the hospital. In the matter of the migraine headaches, left knee pain or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01053

    Original file (PD-2014-01053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Heat Intolerance7999-790010%Residuals of Heat Stroke8199-810010%20040224Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01968

    Original file (PD-2013-01968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Heat Exhaustion, Recurrent7999-79000%Heat Stroke8099-8019NSC20051107Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 620051107 Rating: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060418 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Other Contended Condition .The CI’s application asserts that a compensable rating should be considered for the asthma condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02745

    Original file (PD-2013-02745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left knee X-rayson 21 February 2007 were normal.At the MEB examination on 9 March 2007, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant knee pain. Notes in the STR indicated the CI was advised the right knee pain was due to compensation for the left knee injury. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.