Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01794
Original file (PD-2014-01794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2014-01794
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY  BOARD DATE: 20140930
SEPARATION DATE: 20031113


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PVT/E-1 (93P/Army Aviation Operations Specialist) medically separated for a spine condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The spine condition, characterized as “spine fractures” by the MEB was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “T7, T11 vertebral compression fractures” as unfitting and rated at 20% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: Please consider all conditions.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting spine condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031027
VA - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
T7, T11 Vertebral Compression Fractures 5235 20% Thoracic Spine, Residuals of Compression Fractures to T7 and T11 5235 40% 20040129
Combined: 20%
Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40412 (most proximate to date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Spine Condition. Available treatment records indicate the CI was participating in organized physical training on 9 April 2003 when another service member jumped on his back. The CI had immediate pain in his back and could not move for 5 minutes. He was evaluated at the emergency department, placed on 48-hour quarters and treated with pain medications (Demerol injections, Lortab and Norflex). He was admitted to Lyster Army Hospital on 14 April 2003, where he had a non-antalgic gait, normal lower extremity strength and negative testing for nerve involvement (a straight leg raise that caused back pain bilaterally at 30 degrees and seated straight leg raise that caused back pain at 70 degrees). X-ray images demonstrated a thoracic compression fractures with decreased vertebral body heights (T7 decreased height of 62% anterior and a T11 38% anterior). He was placed on bedrest and air evacuated to Ft. Gordon, Georgia for further evaluation by a spine surgeon. He was treated in an extension back brace for 6 months. The back pain persisted. He received an L3 profile for spine fractures and was referred to the MEB.

The narrative summary dated 2 October 2003 noted chronic mid-back pain, but no pain medications. He had no neurological symptoms. The physical examination revealed a spine mildly tenderness to palpation in the thoracic area, but no redness or swelling. He had a nonantalgic gait with normal bilateral lower extremity strength and sensation. Straight leg raise testing for nerve involvement was negative. Deep tendon reflexes were normal. X-ray images performed in October 2003 showed no progression of kyphosis (hunched posture), a decreased height of T7 at 58% and T11 to 62%. A diagnosis of T7 and T11 vertebral compression fractures was rendered. The orthopedic surgeon opined there was no indication for surgery. Pain ratings were slight and frequent.

At t
he VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) general medical examination (performed 3 months after separation), the CI reported the member who fell on his back weighed over 200 pounds and fell while CI was bent over. CI had not been able to find a job since separation. He reported his back was killing him.” He could not sit for long periods of time. He reported that the pain increased with walking after 250 yards. He could not run. He could walk one flight of stairs, but pain was worse going up. If he jars his body, e.g. accidently stepping off curb, he has immediate back pain. He could no longer ski, play basketball or football or hang glide. The pain was 4/10 and the pain level rose to 10 after constantly bending. At this level movement in any direction caused pain. By the end of the day he had to go to bed and required medication for sleep. He previously used hydrocodone, but it made him drowsy and worked as well as Motrin. Physical examination of the thoracic spine showed tenderness along the entire thoracic spine and muscle spasms when sitting partially bent over. The lumbar spine was very tender to percussion. Forward flexion was limited to 45 degrees and extension to 20 degrees. Lateral flexion was full to 30 degrees bilaterally, although he had pain between the shoulder blades as he reached down. He could perform rotation. X-ray images of the thoracic spine revealed a mild rotoscoliosis (abnormal curving of the spine like an “s”) with 25-30% anterior compression of the body of T7.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the T7, T11 vertebral compression fractures, forward flexion 50 degrees as unfitting with a disability rating of 20% coded 5235, vertebral fracture or dislocation. The VA rated the thoracic spine, residuals of compression fractures T7, T11 with a disability rating of 40%, coded 5237. The Board considered whether criteria for a higher than the PEB’s 20% rating had been met under VASRD codes 5235 (vertebral fracture or dislocation). The Board first considered coding options noting that the Informal PEB and VA appropriately used the same code 5235 (vertebral fractures). Under this code a 20% rating requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees, but not greater than 60 degrees; or, the combined range-of-motion of the thoracolumbar spine not greater than 120 degrees; or, muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour such as scoliosis, reversed lordosis, or abnormal kyphosis. The PEB rating of 20% is supported by the thoracolumbar flexion of 45 degrees. No evaluation in evidence supports a 40% rating, which would require forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine 30 degrees or less; or, favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the T7, T11 condition. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the T7, T11 vertebral compression fractures condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140423, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record

                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                   

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX AR20150006351 (PD201401794)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:



Encl                                                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01040

    Original file (PD2010-01040.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA assigned a 10% evaluation based on VA examination findings of painful motion and tenderness of the thoracolumbar spine with full ROM. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01679

    Original file (PD-2013-01679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040129VA* -based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Compression Fractures… 523510%Fracture of the Thoracic Spine5299-523510%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00725

    Original file (PD 2012 00725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep (20071213)p.168 Flexion (90 Normal) 45 (65, 46, 43) 65 75 Ext (30) 20 (23, 21, 18) 25 20 R Lat Flex (30) 20 (20, 20, 17) 20 30 L Lat Flex (30) 30 (30, 31, 32) 25 30 R Rotation (30) 30 (23, 23, 36) 30 30 L Rotation (30) 30 (35, 42, 36) 30 30 Combined (240) 175 185 215 Comments Limited by pain No...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00322

    Original file (PD-2012-00322.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon review of the examinations, the Board determined the ROM measurements from physical therapy in October 2007 cannot be used to rate the CI’s condition. 5 PD1200322 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: VASRD CODE RATING 5299‐5235 5099‐5003 COMBINED 20% 10% 30% UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02570

    Original file (PD-2013-02570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On examination, he was noted to have 63 degrees of flexion and that 3/5 signs of non-organic pain were present. At the MEB examination on 16 April 2004 (5 months prior to separation), the CI reported on going back pain. Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees)PT ~10 Mo.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00820

    Original file (PD2012-00820.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20031115 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1200820 BOARD DATE: 20130206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (6113/CH-53E Helicopter Mechanic) medically separated for T-10, T-11, T-12 compression fractures with a spinal angulation of 40 degrees. The MEB forwarded “Right Clavicular Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00273

    Original file (PD2012-00273.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20040316 Condition Code Rating Exam Recalcitrant Thoracic Back Pain Secondary to T6 Compression Fx. The VASRD in effect at the time of separation (2004) uses the current General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine and does not have a 5291 disability code. The PEB used the old spine rules to rate the thoracic spine condition at 0% under 5291 criteria.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02590

    Original file (PD-2013-02590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mid-Back Pain Condition . There was no increase in kyphosis at T12.The diagnosis rendered was T12 compression fracture with recalcitrant activity associated back pain.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on25 October 2007, 4 months after separation, the CI reported slight sensory impairment at the site of the fracture at the thoracolumbar junction and in the lower sacral area extending to the gluteal fold along the left side of the buttock. The Board determined that there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01948

    Original file (PD 2014 01948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examiner further noted “Full range of motion was present except for rotation and side bending.”The commander’s statement dated 7 June 2007 (4 months prior to separation) reported that the CI was unable to perform non-administrative duties; and a physician directed that she miss two duty days during the prior 3 months due to her back condition.The narrative summarydated 11 June 2007 reported a normal gait.At the MEB examination for range-of-motion (ROM) dated 23 July 2007 (2 months prior...